An observational study in Physical Activity, sponsored by University of Thessaly. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 59 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-18.
Sponsored by University of Thessaly · Observational
The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population.
The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population. The cross-cultural adaptation of the mBQ was performed according to official guidelines.The reliability was determined by filling out the mBQ, two times, one week apart. For validation, the scores between the mBQ and the IPAQ were compared and the correlation between mBQ and VO2max and between mBQ and interview (METS) were assessed.
University of Thessaly is the lead sponsor of 188 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Healthy
Exclusion Criteria:
100 Healthy Adults
Other: observational
45 Healthy Adults
Other: observational
The reliability was determined (n=100) by filling out the mBQ, two times, one week apart (test-retest). For validation (n=45), the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were compared and the correlation between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max(via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between mBQ and interview (via METS) were assessed.
Reliability
The reliability was determined by filling out the modified Baecke Questionnaire, two times, one week apart (test-Retest). Tool: Modified Baecke Questionnaire (test-retest)
Time frame: one week apart
Validity
For validation, the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were compared and the correlation between Modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max (via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between modified Baecke Questionnaire and interview (via METS) were assessed. Tools: 1. International Physical Activity 2. Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test Questionnaires (VO2max) 3. Interview (METS) 2)
Time frame: 1) IPAQ ( Time Frame: 30 min) 2) Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test (Time Frame: 20 min) 3) Interview (Time Frame: 45 min) 4)Modified Baecke Questionnaire (Time Frame: 30 min)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No — GDPR protected
This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Thessaly