ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04882072Updated Apr 29, 2025Results posted

A Study of Ustekinumab in Participants With Takayasu Arteritis (TAK)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ustekinumab and Placebo in Takayasu Arteritis, sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.. Terminated at 27 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-29.

Sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to difficulties in enrollment and ongoing feasibility issues
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab compared to placebo, in combination with oral glucocorticoid (GC) taper regimen, in participants with relapsing Takayasu Arteritis (TAK).

02

Conditions studied

  • Takayasu Arteritis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Takayasu Arteritis

78 studies on the registry are indexed under Takayasu Arteritis; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 50 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Takayasu Arteritis.

Browse Takayasu Arteritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must have developed a relapse of Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) within 12 weeks prior to administration of study intervention and the relapse must have occurred at a dose of at least 7.5 milligrams (mg)/day (prednisolone or equivalent)
  • Must be receiving oral glucorticoid (GC) treatment of greater than or equal to (>=)15 mg/day (prednisolone or equivalent), inclusive for the treatment of relapsing TAK and be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • If receiving an oral anti- therapy (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine) or anti-coagulation therapy (including but not limited to warfarin) for treatment of TAK, the dose must have been stable for at least 2 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention. In terms of warfarin, the dose should be controlled 1-5mg/day to maintain and International Normalized Ratio (PT-INR) target range between 2.0-3.0 (if participants are over 70 years old, PT-INR target range should be between 1.6-2.6)
  • Have no history of latent or active Tuberculosis (TB) prior to screening. An exception is made for participants who have a history of latent TB and are currently receiving treatment for latent TB, will initiate treatment for latent TB at least 3 weeks prior to the first administration of the study intervention, or have documentation of having completed appropriate treatment for latent TB within 3 years prior to the first administration of the study intervention. It is the responsibility of the investigator to verify the adequacy of previous antituberculous treatment and provide appropriate documentation
  • If receiving an oral anti-hypertensive therapy for treatment of TAK, the dose must have been stable for at least 2 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has currently any known severe or uncontrolled TAK complications (example, hypertension not responding to adequate treatment, aortic incompetence with cardiac insufficiency, progressing aortic aneurysm, coronary artery lesions with severe stenosis)
  • Has received (s) (including but not limited to Methotrexate [MTX], Azathioprine [AZA], Mycophenolate Mofetil [MMF], oral Triamcinolone [TAC], oral Cyclosporine A) within 4 weeks of first study intervention
  • Has had a Bacille Calmette-guerin (BCG) vaccination within 12 months of screening
  • Any major illness/condition or evidence of an unstable clinical condition example, history of liver or renal insufficiency (estimated below 60 milliliters/minute [mL/min]); significant (cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances), disease of any organ system or active acute or chronic infection/infectious illness that, in the investigator's judgment, will substantially increase the risk to the participant if he or she participates in the study
  • Having a condition that is dependent (example, steroid dependent asthma, , et cetera) that is not amenable to tapering oral GC
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ustekinumab

    Double-blind (DB) Period: Participants will receive weight-ranged based ustekinumab (6 milligrams/kilogram\[mg/kg\]) as IV infusion at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90mg injection SC 8 weeks after initial IV dose, then every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter until the end of the DB period with starting the protocol defined oral GC taper regimen from Week 2 visit. Open Label Extension (OLE) period: Participants will receive ustekinumab SC injection at Week OL-0, followed by ustekinumab 90mg SC injection with oral GC taper at investigator's discretion for 52 weeks (Week OL-52) or until 32 weeks from first SC administration after end of DB period whichever is later. Long-term Extension (LTE) Period: Participants who completed OLE period may be eligible to enter LTE and continue to receive ustekinumab 90mg SC injection q8w.

    Drug: Ustekinumab · Drug: Glucorticoid Taper Regimen

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    DB period: Participants will receive placebo intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0 followed by placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection administration, 8 weeks after the initial IV dose, then q8w thereafter until the end of DB period with starting the protocol defined oral GC taper regimen from Week 2 visit. OLE period: Participants will receive ustekinumab SC at Week OL-0, followed by SC administration of ustekinumab with oral GC taper at investigator's discretion for 52 weeks (Week OL-52) or until 32 weeks from the first SC administration after the end of DB period, whichever is later. LTE Period: Participants who complete their participation in OLE period may be eligible to enter the LTE and continue to receive 90 mg SC ustekinumab q8w.

    Drug: Ustekinumab · Other: Placebo · Drug: Glucorticoid Taper Regimen

Interventions

  • Participants will receive IV infusion and SC injection of ustekinumab.

    Also known as: Stelara®, CNTO1275

  • OtherPlacebo

    Participants will receive IV infusion and SC injection of matching placebo.

  • DrugGlucorticoid Taper Regimen

    Glucocorticoid will be administered orally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Relapse (ToR) of Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) According to Protocol-defined Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period

    ToR:time from randomization to 1st relapse through end of double-blind period (EDBP) per protocol-defined criteria with 5 categories:systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling \& tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain. Relapse:\>=2 categories met criteria.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study intervention. TEAEs were defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study intervention through the day of last dose.

    Time frame: Double-blind period: Double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind treatment period (56.1 weeks); OLE period: OL Week 0 up to end of OLE treatment period (48.1 weeks)

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose may results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product. Treatment-emergent SAEs were defined as SAEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study intervention through the day of last dose.

    Time frame: Double-blind period: Double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind treatment period (56.1 weeks); OLE: OL Week 0 up to end of OLE treatment period (48.1 weeks)

  3. Time to Relapse of TAK According to Kerr's Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period

    ToR was defined from the date of randomization to the judged date of relapse through the EDBP based on Kerr's definition: participants who met 2 or more categories in the following 4 categories were considered as relapse: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling \& tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  4. Time to Relapse of TAK Based on Clinical Symptoms Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Time (in weeks) to relapse of TAK: time from randomization to the 1st relapse through the EDBP according to protocol-defined criteria with 5 categories: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling and tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain. Time to relapse was calculated by each category independently. Relapse:\>=2 categories met criteria.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  5. Time to Relapse of TAK in Each of the 5 Categories (Within Protocol-defined Criteria) Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Time to relapse of TAK: time from randomization date to the 1st relapse through the EDBP according to protocol-defined criteria with 5 categories: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling and tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain. Time to relapse was calculated by each category independently. Relapse:\>=2 categories met criteria.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Relapse of TAK in Each of the 5 Categories (Within Protocol-defined Criteria) Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Percentage of participants with time to relapse of TAK through the EDBP were reported. Protocol-defined criteria consisted of 5 categories: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling \& tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms: abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  7. Cumulative Oral Glucocorticoid (GC) Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Cumulative oral GC dose (prednisolone or equivalent) through the end of double-blind period were reported. If the participant had relapse, oral GC dose (prednisolone or equivalent) used from randomization date to last observed date prior to the date of relapse were included in the analysis and if the participant had no relapse then oral GC dose used from randomization to last observed date through the end of double-blind period were included in the analysis.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  8. Change From Baseline in Oral GC Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Change from baseline in oral GC dose through the end of double-blind period were reported. Change from baseline was defined as the change between the GC dose at randomization and the last observed GC dose. If the participant had relapse, oral GC dose (prednisolone or equivalent) used from randomization date to last observed date prior to the date of relapse were included in the analysis and if the participant had no relapse then oral GC dose used from randomization to last observed date through the end of double-blind period were included in the analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (double-blind Week 0) up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  9. Number of Participants Achieving GC Dose of 5 mg/Day or Less Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Number of participants who achieved GC dose of 5 mg/day or less through the end of double-blind period were reported.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  10. Change From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Vessel Involvement (Average Percentage of Dilation) at the End of Double-blind Period

    Change from baseline in average percentage of dilation for abnormal vessel segments through the end of double-blind period was reported. Assessment was performed using computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline (double-blind Week 0) and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)

  11. Change From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Vessel Involvement (Average Percentage of Stenosis) Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Change from baseline in average percentage of stenosis for abnormal vessel segments through the end of double-blind period was reported. Assessment was performed using CTA or MRA. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Week 24, Week 48, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)

  12. Change From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Average Arterial Wall Thickness Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Change from baseline in average wall thickness for abnormal segments through the end of double-blind period was reported. Assessment was performed using CTA or MRA. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Week 24, Week 48, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)

  13. Imaging Evaluation: Number of Participants With Mural Contrast Enhancement Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Number of participants with mural contrast enhancement through the end of double-blind period were reported. The mural contrast enhancement were assessed for imaging evaluation using CTA or MRA. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Week 24, Week 48, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)

  14. Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Change from baseline in CRP (as inflammatory marker) through the end of double-blind period were reported. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)

  15. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Through the End of Double-blind Period

    Change from baseline in ESR (as inflammatory marker) through the end of double-blind period were reported. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)

  16. Serum Concentrations of Ustekinumab in Participants Receiving Ustekinumab During Double-blind Phase

    Serum concentrations of ustekinumab was reported during double-blind Phase. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

    Time frame: Pre-dose (double-blind Week 0), Post-dose: Week 0, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, double-blind relapse (up to 48 weeks)

  17. Serum Concentrations of Ustekinumab in Participants Receiving Ustekinumab During Open-label Extension Phase

    Serum concentrations of ustekinumab was reported during OLE Phase.

    Time frame: Pre-dose (OL Week 0), Post-dose: OL Week 0, OL Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 52, and 56

  18. Number of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of Double-blind Period

    Number of participants with positive anti-ustekinumab antibodies were reported.

    Time frame: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)

  19. Number of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of OLE Period

    Number of participants with positive anti-ustekinumab antibodies were reported.

    Time frame: From OL Week 0 up to end of OLE period (up to 63.1 weeks)

  20. Number of Participants With TEAEs by System Organ Class (SOC) With a Frequency Threshold of 5 Percent (%) or More

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study intervention. TEAEs are defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study intervention through the day of last dose. If same participant had more than one AE within the same SOC, that participant is counted only once in the below data table.

    Time frame: Double-blind period: double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind treatment period (56.1 weeks); OLE period: OL Week 0 up to end of OLE treatment period (48.1 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Dec 2, 2024
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated early by the sponsor due to difficulties in participant recruitment.

Participant flow

Double Blind: Week 0 to Week 71.1
Participant flow — Double Blind: Week 0 to Week 71.1
MilestonePlacebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Started86
Completed66
Not completed20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Withdrawal criterion met10
OL Extension: OL Week 0 to OL Week 63.1
Participant flow — OL Extension: OL Week 0 to OL Week 63.1
MilestonePlacebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Started34
Completed33
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Relapse (ToR) of Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) According to Protocol-defined Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period

ToR:time from randomization to 1st relapse through end of double-blind period (EDBP) per protocol-defined criteria with 5 categories:systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling \& tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain. Relapse:\>=2 categories met criteria.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Time to Relapse (ToR) of Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) According to Protocol-defined Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period
WeeksDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Time to Relapse (ToR) of Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) According to Protocol-defined Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period12.64 (12.14 to NA)11.14 (4.14 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Double-blind: Placebo vs Double-blind: Ustekinumab · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.86 · 95% CI 0.41 to 8.47
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study intervention. TEAEs were defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study intervention through the day of last dose.

Time frame:
Double-blind period: Double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind treatment period (56.1 weeks); OLE period: OL Week 0 up to end of OLE treatment period (48.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: UstekinumabOLE: Placebo Then UstekinumabOLE: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)6512
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose may results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product. Treatment-emergent SAEs were defined as SAEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study intervention through the day of last dose.

Time frame:
Double-blind period: Double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind treatment period (56.1 weeks); OLE: OL Week 0 up to end of OLE treatment period (48.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: UstekinumabOLE: Placebo Then UstekinumabOLE: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1101
SecondaryTime to Relapse of TAK According to Kerr's Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period

ToR was defined from the date of randomization to the judged date of relapse through the EDBP based on Kerr's definition: participants who met 2 or more categories in the following 4 categories were considered as relapse: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling \& tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Time to Relapse of TAK According to Kerr's Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period
WeeksDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Time to Relapse of TAK According to Kerr's Criteria Through the End of Double-blind Period12.64 (12.14 to NA)11.14 (4.14 to NA)
SecondaryTime to Relapse of TAK Based on Clinical Symptoms Through the End of Double-blind Period

Time (in weeks) to relapse of TAK: time from randomization to the 1st relapse through the EDBP according to protocol-defined criteria with 5 categories: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling and tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain. Time to relapse was calculated by each category independently. Relapse:\>=2 categories met criteria.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Relapse of TAK Based on Clinical Symptoms Through the End of Double-blind Period
weeksDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Time to Relapse of TAK Based on Clinical Symptoms Through the End of Double-blind Period12.14 (2.14 to NA)4.14 (2.14 to NA)
SecondaryTime to Relapse of TAK in Each of the 5 Categories (Within Protocol-defined Criteria) Through the End of Double-blind Period

Time to relapse of TAK: time from randomization date to the 1st relapse through the EDBP according to protocol-defined criteria with 5 categories: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling and tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms:abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain. Time to relapse was calculated by each category independently. Relapse:\>=2 categories met criteria.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Relapse of TAK in Each of the 5 Categories (Within Protocol-defined Criteria) Through the End of Double-blind Period
weeksDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Systemic Symptoms (Objective Assessment)14.00 (12.14 to NA)NA (12.14 to NA)
Systemic Symptoms (Subjective Assessment)12.64 (12.14 to NA)10.00 (2.14 to NA)
Elevated Inflammation Markers13.14 (8.14 to NA)12.14 (4.14 to NA)
Vascular Signs And Symptoms12.14 (2.14 to NA)7.14 (2.14 to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Relapse of TAK in Each of the 5 Categories (Within Protocol-defined Criteria) Through the End of Double-blind Period

Percentage of participants with time to relapse of TAK through the EDBP were reported. Protocol-defined criteria consisted of 5 categories: systemic (objective):body temperature \>=38.0°C, weight loss \>2kg in 4 weeks, arthralgia, swelling \& tenderness =\>2 joints; systemic (subjective):malaise, myalgia, headache, dizziness/vertigo at \>= grade 2, high inflammation markers (C-reactive protein \>=1.0mg/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>=30mm/hr), vascular symptoms:renovascular hypertension: if normal BP \<120/80mmHg risen to \>=140/90mmHg, or if normal BP \>=120/80mmHg, diastolic BP risen by \>=20mmHg, new bruits/loss of pulse/difference in systolic BP between left and right by \>=10mmHg/tenderness/spontaneous pain in carotid artery/chest/back region, aortic valve incompetence; ischemic symptoms: abdominal pain, seizure, syncope, intermittent claudication, ischemic cardiac pain.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Relapse of TAK in Each of the 5 Categories (Within Protocol-defined Criteria) Through the End of Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Systemic Symptoms (Objective Assessment)25.016.7
Systemic Symptoms (Subjective Assessment)37.550.0
Elevated Inflammation Markers50.050.0
Vascular Signs And Symptoms50.0100.0
Ischemic Symptoms00
SecondaryCumulative Oral Glucocorticoid (GC) Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period

Cumulative oral GC dose (prednisolone or equivalent) through the end of double-blind period were reported. If the participant had relapse, oral GC dose (prednisolone or equivalent) used from randomization date to last observed date prior to the date of relapse were included in the analysis and if the participant had no relapse then oral GC dose used from randomization to last observed date through the end of double-blind period were included in the analysis.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams (mg)
Cumulative Oral Glucocorticoid (GC) Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period
milligrams (mg)Double-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Cumulative Oral Glucocorticoid (GC) Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period1043.6 ± 367.271319.1 ± 697.67
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Oral GC Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period

Change from baseline in oral GC dose through the end of double-blind period were reported. Change from baseline was defined as the change between the GC dose at randomization and the last observed GC dose. If the participant had relapse, oral GC dose (prednisolone or equivalent) used from randomization date to last observed date prior to the date of relapse were included in the analysis and if the participant had no relapse then oral GC dose used from randomization to last observed date through the end of double-blind period were included in the analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline (double-blind Week 0) up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams per day (mg/day)
Change From Baseline in Oral GC Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period
milligrams per day (mg/day)Double-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Change From Baseline in Oral GC Dose Through the End of Double-blind Period-11.3 ± 3.73-12.1 ± 6.25
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving GC Dose of 5 mg/Day or Less Through the End of Double-blind Period

Number of participants who achieved GC dose of 5 mg/day or less through the end of double-blind period were reported.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Achieving GC Dose of 5 mg/Day or Less Through the End of Double-blind Period
ParticipantsDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Number of Participants Achieving GC Dose of 5 mg/Day or Less Through the End of Double-blind Period31
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Vessel Involvement (Average Percentage of Dilation) at the End of Double-blind Period

Change from baseline in average percentage of dilation for abnormal vessel segments through the end of double-blind period was reported. Assessment was performed using computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline (double-blind Week 0) and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Dilation
Change From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Vessel Involvement (Average Percentage of Dilation) at the End of Double-blind Period
Percentage of DilationDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Change From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Vessel Involvement (Average Percentage of Dilation) at the End of Double-blind Period—-3.95 ± 5.586
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Vessel Involvement (Average Percentage of Stenosis) Through the End of Double-blind Period

Change from baseline in average percentage of stenosis for abnormal vessel segments through the end of double-blind period was reported. Assessment was performed using CTA or MRA. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Week 24, Week 48, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Stenosis
Change From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Vessel Involvement (Average Percentage of Stenosis) Through the End of Double-blind Period
Percentage of StenosisDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Double-blind Week 24—-11.39 ± NA
Double-blind Week 48—-12.62 ± NA
Double-blind Relapse-7.15 ± 10.105-13.94 ± 22.24
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Average Arterial Wall Thickness Through the End of Double-blind Period

Change from baseline in average wall thickness for abnormal segments through the end of double-blind period was reported. Assessment was performed using CTA or MRA. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Week 24, Week 48, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)
Reported as:
Mean · millimeters
Change From Baseline in Imaging Evaluation of Average Arterial Wall Thickness Through the End of Double-blind Period
millimetersDouble-blind : PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Double-blind Week 24—-1.25 ± NA
Double-blind Week 48—-1.25 ± NA
Double-blind Relapse-1.00 ± NA1.00 ± NA
SecondaryImaging Evaluation: Number of Participants With Mural Contrast Enhancement Through the End of Double-blind Period

Number of participants with mural contrast enhancement through the end of double-blind period were reported. The mural contrast enhancement were assessed for imaging evaluation using CTA or MRA. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Week 24, Week 48, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Imaging Evaluation: Number of Participants With Mural Contrast Enhancement Through the End of Double-blind Period
ParticipantsDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Baseline (Week 0)11
Double-blind Week 24—1
Double-blind Week 48—1
Double-blind Relapse01
SecondaryChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Through the End of Double-blind Period

Change from baseline in CRP (as inflammatory marker) through the end of double-blind period were reported. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Through the End of Double-blind Period
milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Double-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Double-blind Week 2-0.003 ± 0.05390.558 ± 0.9585
Double-blind Week 40.529 ± 1.46390.858 ± 1.6216
Double-blind Week 80.918 ± 1.38510.333 ± 0.3505
Double-blind Week 121.475 ± 0.51321.170 ± 1.0333
Double-blind Week 16—-0.010 ± NA
Double-blind Week 20—-0.030 ± NA
Double-blind Week 24—0.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 28—0.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 32—0.310 ± NA
Double-blind Week 36—0.060 ± NA
Double-blind Week 40—-0.020 ± NA
Double-blind Week 44—0.300 ± NA
Double-blind Week 48—-0.010 ± NA
Double-blind Week 52—0.010 ± NA
Double-blind Week 56—0.130 ± NA
Double-blind Relapse2.043 ± 1.56612.598 ± 3.2988
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Through the End of Double-blind Period

Change from baseline in ESR (as inflammatory marker) through the end of double-blind period were reported. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline (double-blind Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and double-blind relapse (up to 14 weeks for Placebo arm; up to 48 weeks for ustekinumab arm)
Reported as:
Mean · millimeters per hour (mm/h)
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Through the End of Double-blind Period
millimeters per hour (mm/h)Double-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Double-blind Week 20.13 ± 1.2461.20 ± 8.349
Double-blind Week 44.75 ± 11.8414.33 ± 17.397
Double-blind Week 86.67 ± 4.1315.13 ± 7.028
Double-blind Week 1224.25 ± 15.17415.50 ± 15.174
Double-blind Week 16—1.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 20—-2.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 24—-2.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 28—12.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 32—13.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 36—2.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 40—2.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 44—0.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 48—-2.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 52—-2.00 ± NA
Double-blind Week 56—20.00 ± NA
Double-blind Relapse28.25 ± 15.50018.63 ± 9.741
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Ustekinumab in Participants Receiving Ustekinumab During Double-blind Phase

Serum concentrations of ustekinumab was reported during double-blind Phase. For a participant, the time point at which the 1st relapse developed or discontinuation from double-blind period was considered as the end of double-blind period.

Time frame:
Pre-dose (double-blind Week 0), Post-dose: Week 0, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, double-blind relapse (up to 48 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per millilitres (mcg/mL)
Serum Concentrations of Ustekinumab in Participants Receiving Ustekinumab During Double-blind Phase
micrograms per millilitres (mcg/mL)Double-blind: Ustekinumab
Pre-dose (Week 0)NA ± NA
Post-dose (Week 0)135.644 ± 33.2099
Week 240.470 ± 8.5492
Week 421.630 ± 3.5437
Week 88.663 ± 2.9795
Week 127.762 ± 0.7537
Week 163.811 ± NA
Week 204.970 ± NA
Week 242.195 ± NA
Week 285.323 ± NA
Week 322.033 ± NA
Week 363.984 ± NA
Week 401.695 ± NA
Week 444.958 ± NA
Week 482.121 ± NA
Week 526.447 ± NA
Week 562.596 ± NA
Week 603.244 ± NA
Double-blind: Relapse13.437 ± NA
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Ustekinumab in Participants Receiving Ustekinumab During Open-label Extension Phase

Serum concentrations of ustekinumab was reported during OLE Phase.

Time frame:
Pre-dose (OL Week 0), Post-dose: OL Week 0, OL Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 52, and 56
Reported as:
Mean · mcg/mL
Serum Concentrations of Ustekinumab in Participants Receiving Ustekinumab During Open-label Extension Phase
mcg/mLOLE: Placebo Then UstekinumabOLE: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Pre-dose OL Week 0NA ± NA4.765 ± 2.1977
Post-dose OL Week 0126.394 ± 15.5782132.580 ± 36.2574
OL Week 815.830 ± 7.311310.912 ± 4.5891
OL Week 167.253 ± NA7.560 ± NA
OL Week 248.844 ± 4.37754.807 ± NA
OL Week 326.096 ± NA3.870 ± NA
OL Week 403.911 ± NA3.911 ± NA
OL Week 483.719 ± NA—
OL Week 529.676 ± NA—
OL Week 563.710 ± NA—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of Double-blind Period

Number of participants with positive anti-ustekinumab antibodies were reported.

Time frame:
From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of Double-blind Period
ParticipantsDouble-blind: Ustekinumab
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of Double-blind Period0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of OLE Period

Number of participants with positive anti-ustekinumab antibodies were reported.

Time frame:
From OL Week 0 up to end of OLE period (up to 63.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of OLE Period
ParticipantsOLE: Placebo Then UstekinumabOLE: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-ustekinumab Antibodies Through End of OLE Period00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs by System Organ Class (SOC) With a Frequency Threshold of 5 Percent (%) or More

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study intervention. TEAEs are defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study intervention through the day of last dose. If same participant had more than one AE within the same SOC, that participant is counted only once in the below data table.

Time frame:
Double-blind period: double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind treatment period (56.1 weeks); OLE period: OL Week 0 up to end of OLE treatment period (48.1 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs by System Organ Class (SOC) With a Frequency Threshold of 5 Percent (%) or More
ParticipantsDouble-blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: UstekinumabOLE: Placebo Then UstekinumabOLE: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Ear and Labyrinth Disorders0100
Eye Disorders2200
Gastrointestinal Disorders3012
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions0402
Infections and Infestations1600
Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications1311
Investigations0101
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders0100
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders1100
Nervous System Disorders0511
Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders0002
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders4000
Vascular Disorders1201

Adverse events

Collected over Double-blind period: From double-blind Week 0 up to end of double-blind period (up to 71.1 weeks); OLE period: From OL-Week 0 up to end of OLE period (up to 63.1 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Double Blind: Placebo0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)6/8 (75%)
Double-blind: Ustekinumab0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)5/6 (83.3%)
OLE Period: Placebo Then Ustekinumab0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)1/3 (33.3%)
OLE Period: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab0/4 (0%)1/4 (25%)2/4 (50%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDouble Blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: UstekinumabOLE Period: Placebo Then UstekinumabOLE Period: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab
Vascular Graft InfectionInfections and infestations0/80/60/31/4
Vascular PseudoaneurysmInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/81/60/30/4
Brachiocephalic Artery StenosisVascular disorders0/81/60/30/4
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders1/80/60/30/4
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 46
Most frequent other events
EventDouble Blind: PlaceboDouble-blind: UstekinumabOLE Period: Placebo Then UstekinumabOLE Period: Ustekinumab Then Ustekinumab
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/80/61/30/4
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/82/60/31/4
Vaccination Site PainGeneral disorders0/82/60/30/4
ChillblainsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/80/61/30/4
Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNervous system disorders0/80/61/30/4
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/81/61/30/4
Takayasu's ArteritisVascular disorders1/82/60/30/4
Coating in MouthGastrointestinal disorders0/80/60/31/4
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/80/60/31/4
MalaiseGeneral disorders0/80/60/31/4

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then UstekinumabTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years6612
>=65 years202
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then UstekinumabTotal
Mean49.6 ± 15.4636.5 ± 12.1944 ± 15.21
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then UstekinumabTotal
Female7411
Male123
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then UstekinumabTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino8614
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then UstekinumabTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian8614
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Placebo Then UstekinumabUstekinumab Then UstekinumabTotal
Japan8614
08

Study locations

27 sites
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital
    Bunkyo Ku, 113 8519, Japan
  • Chiba University Hospital
    Chiba, 260 8677, Japan
  • Kyushu University Hospital
    Fukuoka, 812 8582, Japan
  • Hamamatsu University Hospital
    Hamamatsu, 431 3192, Japan
  • Saitama Medical University Hospital
    Iruma-gun, 350-0495, Japan
  • Kagawa University Hospital
    Kita Gun, 761 0793, Japan
  • Kobe University Hospital
    Kobe, 650 0017, Japan
  • Kyoto University Hospital
    Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
  • Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital
    Matsuyama-City, 790-8524, Japan
  • Nagoya City University Hospital
    Nagoya City, 467 8602, Japan
  • Niigata University Medical And Dental Hospital
    Niigata, 951 8520, Japan
  • Okayama University Hospital
    Okayama, 700 8558, Japan
  • Kindai University Hospital
    Osaka Sayama shi, 589 8511, Japan
  • Kitano Hospital
    Osaka, 530-8480, Japan
  • Rinku General Medical Center
    Osaka, 598-8577, Japan
  • Kitasato University Hospital
    Sagamihara, 252-0375, Japan
  • Hokkaido University Hospital
    Sapporo-shi, 060-8648, Japan
  • Sapporo Medical University Hospital
    Sapporo, 060-8543, Japan
  • Tohoku University Hospital
    Sendai, 980 8574, Japan
  • Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine
    Shinjuku ku, 162 8655, Japan
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
    Suita-Shi, 564-8565, Japan
  • Mitsui Memorial Hospital
    Tokyo, 101-8643, Japan
  • St. Luke's International Hospital
    Tokyo, 104 8560, Japan
  • Fujita Health University Hospital
    Toyoake, 470-1192, Japan
  • University of Tsukuba Hospital
    Tsukuba, 305 8576, Japan
  • Wakayama Medical University Hospital
    Wakayama, 641 8510, Japan
  • Tottori University Hospital
    Yonago, 683-8504, Japan
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Data sharing details ↗ · www.janssen.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04882072
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2021
Start date
Sep 15, 2021
Primary completion
May 25, 2023
Completion
May 25, 2023
Results posted
Dec 2, 2024
Last update
Apr 29, 2025

Study contacts

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Japan Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ustekinumab

Start the discussion