CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04881773OLDTINYpeanutUpdated May 11, 2021

Oral Low Doses Tolerance INduction Study for Peanuts

An observational study in Peanut Allergy, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-11.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2021), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
5 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Several protocols have been proposed in scientifis literature, for oral tolerance induction (OIT) protocols for peanuts. A meta-analysis showed that the data in the literature are rather in favor of the exclusion of peanuts, and that OIT doesn't allow to expect significant levels of peanut protein consumed by the patient, and is associated with an increased risk of anaphylaxis and epinephrine use. Also, in most published protocols, patients with a history of anaphylactic shock, severe asthma, or multiple history of anaphylaxis are excluded.

To date, no protocol has been validated for this type of treatment, and each center follows locally validated schemes. In our unit, the investigators use an OIT protocol that starts at low doses (first dose at 2.68 mg peanut protein) and doses increase is scheduled every 4 to 12 weeks (instead of every 2 weeks). The investigators do not exclude patients with asthma or those with a history of peanut anaphylaxis (grade 2 or 3). The investigators have noted that our protocol is associated with a good safety profile and good efficacy, probably due to the fact that the investigators start at low doses and increase the dose with a prolonged delay, compared to previously published protocols. For this reason, the investigators decided to evaluate the results the investigators obtained in our patients and to better analyze the efficacy and safety profile of our protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy

Keywords

  • Food allergy
  • peanuts
  • Oral Immunotherapy
  • efficacy
  • safety
  • Peanut IgE mediated allergy
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,916 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 115 across 479 observational studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,244 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients older that 5 years of age, with a diagnosis of IgE mediated peanuts allergy, undergoing a oral immunotherapy protocol for peanuts, at the University Hospital of Montpellier (France)

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients evaluated at the Montpellier University Hospital, Allergy Unit ;
  • Patients aged 5 years or older;
  • Patients with a history of immediate reaction after consuming peanuts
  • AND a positive peanut prick test;
  • AND peanut positive specific serum IgE (ImmunoCAP®);
  • AND a positive oral peanut challenge test OR a clinical history of anaphylaxis AND peanut-specific IgE> 100 kUA / L (ImmunoCAP®);
  • Patients who started peanut OIT between September 2018 and January 2021.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients in exclusion period determined by a previous study;
  • Patients under legal protection, under guardianship or under curatorship;
  • Possible poor therapeutic compliance to the OIT protocol;
  • Active malignant neoplasia or autoimmune disease;
  • Active eosinophilic esophagitis or other gastrointestinal eosinophilic disorders;
  • Severe active eczema;
  • Pregnancy ;
  • Cardiovascular disease and use of beta blockers and / or ACE inhibitors;
  • Chronic urticaria;
  • Mastocytosis.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
2,000 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients who reach a tolerated dose

    Percentage of patients who reach a tolerated dose of 2000 mg of PP during the ITO and percentage of patients who reach a cumulative tolerated dose of 4400 mg of PP during the oral challenge, carried out at least 6 month after the end of the ITO.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients experiencing side effects during OIT

    Percentage of patients experiencing side effects during OIT (classified on the basis of their severity); percentage of patients in whom the tolerated dose of PP could be doubled and tripled, compared to the eliciting dose, assessed during an oral food challenge before the beginning of the OIT; percentage of patients who achieve a tolerated dose of 300 mg of PP and 1000 mg of PP during OIT. By doing a subgroup analysis, we will evaluate the same results in patients with a clinical history of grade 2 or grade three anaphylaxis to peanuts.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Uhmontpellier
    Montpellier, 34295, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — NC

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04881773
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2021
Completion
Jun 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2021

Study contacts

Davide CAIMMI
study director · University Hospital, Montpellier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion