CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04875039Updated Mar 4, 2022

Dexametasone Versus Dexametasone Plus Dexmedetomidine in Nerve Blocks

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine-Dexamethasone in Analgesia, Pain, Acute and Upper Extremity Injury, sponsored by University of Chile. Completed at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-04.

Sponsored by University of Chile · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare perineural dexamethasone 2mg and perineural mixture of dexamethasone 2mg plus dexmedetomidine 50mcg DX plus DXD as adjuvants to local anesthetics for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (ICBs). The protocol is designed as a superiority trial and hypothesizes that the mixture of both drugs results in longer block duration. Furthermore, since analgesic and sensory duration can be influenced by the intake of pain medications and surgical trauma to small cutaneous nerves, respectively, motor block duration was selected as the main outcome to better target the action of both adjuvants on the brachial plexus.

Read the detailed description

With the approval of Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, a total of 50 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery (elbow and below) will be recruited. Recruitment will be carried out by an investigator not involved in patient care in the preoperative clinic or during routine preoperative visits.

All ICBs will be supervised by one of the coauthors and conducted preoperatively in an induction room.

After skin disinfection and draping, the ICB will be performed with a previously described technique. In both groups, a proven 90% effective volume of 35 mL of local anesthetic solution will be injected. As LA solution, it will be used a mixture of lidocaine 1.0%-bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µ/mL. The injectate will be slowly injected through the block needle.

Patients will be randomized to receive the study drug, either PN 2 mg dexamethasone or a combination of PN 2 mg dexamethasone with 50 ug dexmedetomidine, mixed with the above-mentioned LA solution.

A research assistant (licensed anesthesiologist) will prepare the local anesthetic solutions and will add the study drug following the randomization order. The operator, patient and investigator assessing the block will be blinded to group allocation.

The primary outcome will be the duration of the motor block (defined as the temporal interval between the end of LA injection through the block needle and the return of movement to the hand and fingers) for patients with successful ICBs. Patients will be provided with a data sheet and asked to record the time at which motor function returns. An investigator blinded to group allocation will collect this data sheet in person (inpatients) or by phone (outpatients) on postoperative day 1.

02

Conditions studied

  • Analgesia
  • Pain, Acute
  • Upper Extremity Injury

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • dexamethasone
  • dexmedetomidine
  • nerve block
  • adjuvants
03

In context

Arm Injuries

65 studies on the registry are indexed under Arm Injuries; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 55 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Arm Injuries.

Browse Arm Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chile is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
  • Body mass index between 20 and 35

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are unable to give their own consent
  • Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
  • Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
  • Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
  • Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs)
  • Pregnancy
  • Prior surgery in the infraclavicular region
  • Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Perineural dexamethasone

    Addition of dexamethasone 2mg to local anesthetics in infraclavicular brachial plexus block

    Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Experimental
    Perineural dexamethasone plus dexmedetomidine

    Addition of dexamethasone plus dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics in infraclavicular brachial plexus block

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine-Dexamethasone

Interventions

  • DrugDexamethasone

    dexamethasone 2 mg will be added to the local anesthetic used to block the cords of the brachial plexus with an infraclavicular approach.

  • DrugDexmedetomidine-Dexamethasone

    A mixture of dexamethasone 2mg with dexmedetomidine 50mcg will be added to the local anesthetic used to block the cords of the brachial plexus with an infraclavicular approach.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Motor block duration

    The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of return of hand and fingers movement

    Time frame: 24-48 hours after block

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensory block duration

    The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of the return of hand and fingers sensation

    Time frame: Time Frame: 24-48 hours after nerve block

  2. Analgesic block duration

    The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of the first sensation of pain in the surgical area

    Time frame: 24-48 hours after nerve block

  3. Block performance time

    Sum of: 1- the acquisition time of the ultrasonographic image. and 2- the time to perform the block itself (from the skin anesthesia to the end of local anesthetic injection)

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery

  4. Intensity of pain during block procedure

    Evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. This scale is graduated from 0 to 10 points. A 0-point score represents the absence of pain, and a 10-points score represents the worst imaginable pain. Patients will be asked to rate their pain verbally with this scale. The blinded assessor will register the score reported.

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery

  5. Block onset time

    Time required to reach a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points. The sensorimotor score is described in outcome 7.

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery

  6. Sensory and motor block score

    The sensorimotor block will be assessed every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after the end of local anesthetic injection using a 16-point composite score evaluating sensory and motor block of musculocutaneous, medium, radial, and ulnar nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice in each nerve territory with a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, the patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, the patient cannot feel cold or touch. The motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis. Successful blocks at 30 minutes correlate with a final score ( sum of all individual sensory and motor scores) of at least 14 points out of 16.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection

  7. Incidence of complete block

    Percentage of blocks with a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points at 30 minutes after the injection

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection

  8. Incidence of surgical anesthesia

    Ability to proceed with surgery without the need for intravenous narcotics, general anesthesia, rescue blocks or local anesthesia infiltration by the surgeon

    Time frame: 30-60 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection

  9. Incidence of nerve block side effects

    Determined by the presence of paresthesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, vascular puncture, Horner syndrome or hoarseness after the block.

    Time frame: 0 minutes after skin disinfection to 30 minutes after the nerve block

  10. Respiratory depression

    Presence of low respiratory rates (lower than 8 breaths per minute) or persistent oxygen requirements (pulse oximetry lower than 90% without supplementary oxygen). The respiratory rate and pulse oximetry are continuously measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the nerve block to 2 hours after surgery

  11. Bradycardia

    Defined as a heart rate lower than 50 beats per minute. The heart rate is continuously measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the nerve block to 2 hours after surgery

  12. Hypotension

    Mean arterial pressure lower than 60 mmHg. The blood pressure is measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the nerve block to 2 hours after surgery

  13. Postoperative persistent sedation

    Persistent sedation after surgery using Ramsay sedation scale. The scale has 6 points from 1 to 6. A higher score represents a more sedated patient. 1= anxious, agitated or restless; 2= co-operative, oriented and tranquil; 3= responds to command only; 4= brisk response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 5= sluggish response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 6= no response.

    Time frame: 2 hours after surgery

  14. Persistent neurologic deficit

    Presence of persistent sensory or motor postoperative deficit. The patients will be contacted by telephone and inquired about any sensory or motor deficit in the operated extremity.

    Time frame: 7 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
    Santiago, Metropolitan, Chile
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tran DQ, Bertini P, Zaouter C, Munoz L, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c7717c. PubMed 20048654 ↗
  • Tran DQ, Dugani S, Dyachenko A, Correa JA, Finlayson RJ. Minimum effective volume of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):190-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4266. PubMed 21270721 ↗
  • Leurcharusmee P, Aliste J, Van Zundert TC, Engsusophon P, Arnuntasupakul V, Tiyaprasertkul W, Tangjitbampenbun A, Ah-Kye S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Between Intravenous and Perineural Dexamethasone for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):328-33. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000386. PubMed 27015546 ↗
  • Chong MA, Berbenetz NM, Lin C, Singh S. Perineural Versus Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant for Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):319-326. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000571. PubMed 28252523 ↗
  • Vorobeichik L, Brull R, Abdallah FW. Evidence basis for using perineural dexmedetomidine to enhance the quality of brachial plexus nerve blocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;118(2):167-181. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew411. PubMed 28100520 ↗
  • Bravo D, Aliste J, Layera S, Fernandez D, Leurcharusmee P, Samerchua A, Tangjitbampenbun A, Watanitanon A, Arnuntasupakul V, Tunprasit C, Gordon A, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A multicenter, randomized comparison between 2, 5, and 8 mg of perineural dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan;44(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000032. PubMed 30640652 ↗
  • Aliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Fernandez D, Jara A, Garcia A, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Randomized comparison between perineural dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jul 11:rapm-2019-100680. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100680. Online ahead of print. PubMed 31300595 ↗
  • Aliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Aguilera G, Erpel H, Garcia A, Lizama M, Finlayson RJ, Tran D. Randomized comparison between perineural dexamethasone and combined perineural dexamethasone-dexmedetomidine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun 21:rapm-2022-103760. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103760. Online ahead of print. PubMed 35728840 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04875039
Lead sponsor
University of Chile
Responsible party
Julian Aliste (Assistant Professor, University of Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 6, 2021
Start date
Aug 31, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2022
Completion
Mar 1, 2022
Last update
Mar 4, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion