An interventional study of Triple P online with professional support and Triple P online without professional support in Parenting, sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile. Status unknown at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-01.
Sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The Triple P program is a comprehensive system of parenting and family support of multilevel preventive intervention, developed for families with members up to 16 years of age, whose objective is to improve parenting skills and prevent or modify dysfunctional parenting practices, thus reducing Family risk factors that affect both child abuse, behavioral problems and emotional problems.
Based on the importance that evidence-based parental interventions have acquired and the need from the health field to provide innovative alternatives that facilitate access to this type of services, parental support programs given through the web emerge. There is evidence that supports the idea that parenting programs taught through the web have an influence on reducing disruptive behaviors in children.
Triple P Online (TPOL) is an adaptation of the Positive Parenting Program, Triple P, a program that has been empirically tested. This adaptation is a parental intervention through the web with self-directed modality, which is based on Level 4 of the Triple P parental program and is configured in 8 interactive sessions with online modules. The topics covered are: 1) What is Positive Parenting, 2) Reinforcing the behavior we want, 3) Teaching new skills, 4) Managing negative behaviors, 5) Managing disobedience, 6) Preventing problems through planning, 7) Making fun outings, 8) Raising confident and competent children.
The main results observed in the implementation of the online Triple P program are (Sanders et al, 2012): reduction of problem child behavior, dysfunctional parenting styles, increasing parents' confidence in their parenting role, and reduction of parental anger.
517 studies on the registry are indexed under Problem Behavior; 92 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,920 is above the median of 90 across 391 interventional studies indexed under Problem Behavior.
Browse Problem Behavior studies →Universidad de los Andes, Chile is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
In the online version with professional support, the psychologist in charge will have the role of monitoring the autonomous work of the participants during the 8 sessions, as well as answering questions and doubts that the participants may have regarding the program and its implementation.
Other: Triple P online with professional support
In the version without professional support, the role of the psychologist in charge will be to keep the platform updated so that the person who self-administers the intervention does not have technical problems associated with the platform.
Other: Triple P online without professional support
Control group without any intervention.
The psychologist in charge will have the role of monitoring the autonomous work of the participants during the 8 sessions. The psychologist in charge will also verify that the participants are able to complete the online modules week by week, that they understand the contents taught in the module and that they are practicing the tasks and exercises assigned in each of the modules; in addition to generating an action plan in case the participants are not adhering week by week to the self-administration of the program. The follow-up and contact with the families will be carried out by phone and through a weekly email-type messaging system, implemented within the same platform on which the program material is found
The role of the psychologist in charge will be to keep the platform updated so that the person who self-administers the intervention does not have technical problems associated with the platform.
Acceptability of the program by parents/main caregivers using the Acceptability Scale (AS)
A questionnaire exploring the acceptability of the program will be answered by parents/main caregivers of students attending Grade 1 to Grade 4, Primary school, who will participate in the intervention. This questionnaire asks about the parents´opinions about the content of the intervention, strategies used, materials, and performance of the health professional helping in the intervention.The latter is only applicable for parents participating in "Group Triple-p online with professional support". The questionnaire also asks about satisfaction and the helpfulness of the program to improve parenting management. For each statement, the answers can go from 1=Strongly disagree to 5=Strongly agree. A high score means higher acceptably and satisfacción with the program. This is a questionnaire created by the research team.
Time frame: Inmediately Post-intervention
Feasibility of the program using the Feasibility Inventory (FI)
A register will be used to determine the number of schools initially contacted and the number of schools that accepted to participate; number of parents/main caregivers contacted and that consented and assented to participate in the study at baseline and at follow-up; the number of sessions completed by parents in the platform, the number of telephone contacts delivered by the health professionals, the number of meeting over the phone conducted with parents. This Feasibility Inventory (FI) was created by the research team. This registry will not produce a score, rather it will provide indicators to achievements for several areas of the implementation of the program.
Time frame: 6 months
Parenting Scale (PS)
This 30-item questionnaire measures three dysfunctional discipline styles: Laxness (permissive discipline), Over-reactivity (authoritarian discipline, anger, meanness and irritability) and Verbosity (long reprimands or reliance on talking). The scale has good test-retest reliability (r = .83, .82, and .79, respectively) and has been found to discriminate between parents of clinic and nonclinic children; and to correlate with observational measures of dysfunctional discipline. Each item is answered in a scale of 7 points, according to what are the typical behavior parent perform under each scenario. A total score is computed, ranging from 30 to 210. A high score means parents are choosing more effective strategies to deal with different scenarios.
Time frame: One month
Parenting Task Checklist (PTC)
This checklist assesses parents' confidence in successfully dealing with 14 difficult child behaviors like whining and temper tantrums (Behavior Self-efficacy), and in dealing with difficult behavior in 14 different settings such as shopping and having visitors (Setting Self-efficacy).
Time frame: One month
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
The APQ measures five dimensions of parenting that are relevant to the etiology and treatment of child externalizing problems: (1) positive involvement with children, (2) supervision and monitoring, (3) use of positive discipline techniques, (4) consistency in the use of such discipline and (5) use of corporal punishment. The project will use the dimensions (1), (3), and (4)., and it will not use the dimension of "(2) supervision and monitoring" because it is not relevant for the target population; and "(5) use of corporal punishment" because it is not the focus of the intervention. The parent form will be used. This questionnaire has 22 items. Each statement is answered from 1= Never to 4 = Often. The score ranges from 22 to 44. a High scores means better parenting skills.
Time frame: One month
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
The 25-item SDQ measures perceptions of prosocial and difficult behaviors in children aged 3-16 years. It has good test-retest reliability (r = .85) and has been found to discriminate well between low-risk and high-risk samples. Five scale scores are computed: Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Problems, Inattention/Hyperactivity, Peer Problems, and Prosocial Behavior. The first four sub-scales are included into one scleras of "Total Difficulties". Each item is answered from 0=Not true to 2=Certainly true. The score of each sub-scale ranges from 0 to 10. In the case of the Total Difficulties scale, Emotional symptoms sub-scale, Conduct Problems sub-scale, Inattention/Hyperactivity sub-scale, and Peer Problems sub-scale, a high score means more symptoms. In the cae of the Prosocial Behavior scale, a high score means stronger prosocial skills.
Time frame: 2 months
Plan to share: Undecided — Investigators plan to deposit the data collected in this study in the "UK Data Service". Data sharing will never compromise participant privacy, neither schools nor students.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad de los Andes, Chile