ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04870203CRI-RAUpdated Mar 17, 2026

Combination of Baricitinib and Anti-TNF in Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of baricitinib treatment and anti-TNF therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Active, not recruiting at 36 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-17.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As stated by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the Société Française de Rhumatologie (SFR), treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should target sustained remission or at least low disease activity. However, despite significant advances based on various combinations of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs, RA therapies meet treatment goals only in some patients:

  • 40 to 50% of patients with early RA, treated with methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy as first-line therapy,
  • 20 to 30% of patients treated with a combination of MTX and biologic as second-line therapy.
  • Less than 10% of patients treated with a combination of MTX and another targeted DMARD, such as baricitinib, as third-line therapy.

Therefore, new strategies targeted at achieving a higher percentage of remission are needed, that do not require waiting for multiple failed therapies. Combinations of biologics have shown synergistic improvement of symptoms in murine models of RA relative to the improvement observed with either agent alone. However, in RA patients, only five randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have explored the efficacy and safety of combining tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor with another biologic (anakinra, abatacept, rituximab or bimekizumab).

Baricitinib is a selective, reversible and competitive inhibitor of Janus kinases (Jaki). This treatment is efficient in a number of therapeutic scenarios in RA and showed a clinical superiority over adalimumab in one RCT (RA-BEAM study in MTX inadequate responders). Of note, baricitinib inhibits many of the pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA but does not block signalling downstream of TNF. Owing to the interest in combining different mechanisms of action, the investigators plan to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with baricitinib and a TNF inhibitor. The investigators are aware that combining targeted therapies is not recommended due to a potential increase in the frequency of serious adverse events. However, several case series on patients treated with a combination of targeted therapies have been published, suggesting a certain efficacy in patients with refractory RA. The first ones focused on inflammatory bowel diseases and psoriasis, but more recently, combination of tofacitinib (which belongs to the same Jaki family as baricitinib) with various biologics has been reported in a sample of RA patients. No serious adverse effects were reported over a mean of approximately 11 months of therapy. The clinical improvement was mild but noticeable in these refractory RA cases.

Recently, data of interest from the RA-BEAM study have been reported. Patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib showed improvements in disease control. Because the switch from adalimumab to baricitinib occurred without a washout period, and because adalimumab has a mean circulating half-life of approximately 14 days, patients would have received several weeks of dual TNF and Jak1/Jak2 inhibition in the course of the change of treatment. The observation of increased efficacy, with no apparent acute safety issues during the weeks when patients were exposed to both adalimumab and baricitinib, is of interest, and supports our strategy to combine the two treatments for patients with refractory RA.

The investigators consider that there is a need for investigation into the addition of anti-TNF to baricitinib in patients suffering of refractory RA (inadequate response to TNF inhibitors). The investigators hypothesize that in this population, based on ACR50 score, this combination therapy will decrease disease activity more efficiently than a switch to another targeted DMARD, such as baricitinib.

Read the detailed description

Intensive combination therapies have revolutionised the management of solid neoplasms, hematologic malignancies, and acquired-immune-deficiency syndrome. These intensive strategies are based on the need to obtain rapid control of disease activity to afford the chance of stable full remission and avoid irreversible complications. The same goal applies to management of RA. Because current therapeutic strategies may fall short of these target goals and fail to improve quality of life in some patients, novel approaches are needed to improve outcomes. RA is a complex disease involving numerous cell types and inflammatory mediators of innate and adaptive immune systems. The investigators are aware that most of combination bDMARD strategies have been associated with little or no incremental benefit in efficacy compared to single-biologic therapy. However, our study will target mechanisms that differ from those in previous studies. Strategies that simultaneously target different pathways involved in the pathogenesis of RA may enhance treatment responses in patients with RA. Of note, baricitinib does not directly block signalling downstream of TNF, even if an indirect effect on TNF production is likely to occur. Targeting multiple inflammatory cytokines in combination may lead to more effective treatment and enhanced clinical responses in patients with RA compared to the current second-line strategies. The different mechanisms of action of baricitinib and anti-TNF, should ensure the efficacy of the combination. No concurrent trial evaluating similar strategies is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • baricitinib
  • adalimumab
  • etanercept
  • placebo
03

In context

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

3,332 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid; 443 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 96 across 2,220 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid.

Browse Arthritis, Rheumatoid studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 806 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female;
  • Age between 18 and 65 years-old;
  • Adult patient with a diagnosis of RA as defined by the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for the classification of RA;
  • Patient who presents an inadequate response to at least one bDMARD or tsDMARD for at least 12 weeks prior to study entry at a dose that is considered acceptable to assess clinical response adequately;
  • Patient affected by active RA (DAS28-ESR > 3.2 or sDAI > 11 or cDAI > 10) eligible to receive a bDMARD or tsDMARD according to the French Society of Rheumatology guidelines;
  • Patient treated by prednisone dosage ≤ 10mg per day. The dosage will be decreased to 7,5 mg/day at the beginning of the study (W0);
  • Person affiliated with or beneficiary of the French social security scheme;
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator (on the day of inclusion at the latest and before any examination required by the research project).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient previously treated with baricitinib;
  • Patient previously treated by both adalimumab and etanercept. If the patient received previously only one of these two treatments, he/she can be included in the study with the treatment he/she has not yet received (if he/she is randomized in the experimental COMBI group);
  • Patient affected by another form of inflammatory arthritis with the exception of secondary Sjögren syndrome;
  • Patient who presents to the study treatments;
  • Patients who is an active smoker or former smokers with a maximum exposure of 10 years;
  • Patient who is currently receiving glucocorticosteroids at doses >10 mg of prednisone per day (or equivalent) or has been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of within 4 weeks of study entry;
  • Patient who is currently receiving more than 1 concomitant csDMARD (MTX, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine or sulfasalazine) at the time of study entry;
  • Patient who is currently receiving or has received csDMARDs (eg, gold salts, cyclosporine, azathioprine, or any other immunosuppressives) other than MTX (up to 25 mg/week), leflunomide (up to 20 mg/day), hydroxychloroquine (up to 400 mg/day), or sulfasalazine (up to 3000 mg/day) within 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  • Doses of hydroxychloroquine or sulfasalazine should be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry; if either has been recently discontinued, the patient must not have taken any dose within 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  • related to organ transplantation is not permitted;
  • Patient who has received any parenteral corticosteroid administered by intramuscular or intravenous injection within 4 weeks prior to study entry, or is anticipated to require parenteral injection of corticosteroids during the study;
  • Patient who had 3 or more joints injected with intraarticular corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid within 4 weeks prior to study entry. Joints injected with intraarticular corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid within 2 weeks prior to study entry or within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization cannot be counted in the TJC and SJC for entry or enrollment purposes;
  • Patient with less than 80 g/L, absolute lymphocyte count lower than 0.5×109/L, less than 1×109/L, or count less than 100×109/L; clearance creatinine less than 60 mL/min; total more than 1.5 times the (ULN) at screening, , or alanine amino-transferase more than 2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening.
  • Patient with co-administration with OAT3 inhibitors (such as probenecid);
  • Patient who has a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, or neuropsychiatric diseases or any other serious and/or unstable illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, could constitute a risk when taking product or could interfere with the interpretation of data;
  • Patient with an history of Moderate to severe heart failure ( classes III/IV);
  • Patient with an history of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke);
  • Patient who has a history of Venous Thromboembolic Event (VTE) (DVT/PE) within 12 weeks prior to randomization or have a history of recurrent (>1) VTE (DVT/PE). Prior DVT with PE where events overlapped in time (i.e., with PE considered resulting from DVT) is not considered recurrent DVT/PE for the purpose of this criterion.
  • Patient who has been exposed to a within 12 weeks prior to planned randomization or are expected to need/receive a live vaccine during the course of the study (with the exception of herpes zoster vaccination). Investigators should review the vaccination status of their patients and follow the local guidelines for adult vaccination with nonlive vaccines intended to prevent infectious disease prior to entering patients into the study;
  • Patient with an active cancer;
  • Patient with or history of malignancy;
  • Patient who has a current or recent (\<30 days prior to study entry) clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection;
  • Patient who is immunocompromised and, in the opinion of the investigator, is at an unacceptable risk for participating in the study;
  • Patient with a history of active virus (HBV), virus (HCV), or (HIV);
  • Patient who had household contact with a person with active tuberculosis (TB) and did not receive appropriate and documented prophylaxis for TB;
  • Patient who has evidence of active TB or has previously had evidence of active TB and did not receive appropriate and documented treatment;
  • Patient who has evidence of latent TB (as documented by a positive Purified Protein Derivative (PPD), no clinical symptoms consistent with active TB, and a normal chest x-ray at screening) unless patient completes at least 3 weeks of appropriate treatment prior to study entry and agrees to complete the remainder of treatment while in the trial
  • Patient who had any major surgery within 8 weeks prior to study entry or will require major surgery during the study that, in the opinion of the investigator, would pose an unacceptable risk to the patient;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, or woman who refuses to use an effective during the study course;
  • Patient governed by articles L 1121-5 to L 1121-8 (persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, minors, persons of legal age who are the object of a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Period A : baricitinib + anti-TNF

    Drug: baricitinib treatment · Drug: anti-TNF therapy

  • Placebo comparator
    Period A : baricitinib + placebo

    Drug: baricitinib treatment · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Period B : baricitinib + anti-TNF

    Drug: baricitinib treatment · Drug: anti-TNF therapy

  • Active comparator
    Period B : baricitinib

    Drug: baricitinib treatment

Interventions

  • Drugbaricitinib treatment

    4 mg daily during 12 months

  • Druganti-TNF therapy

    adalimumab at 40 mg every 2 weeks or etanercept 50 mg per week according to treatments history

  • DrugPlacebo

    40 mg every 2 weeks during 6 months only during Period A

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR 50 response

    in each treatment group (COMBI group (anti-TNF therapy + baricitinib) vs. MONO group (baricitinib conventional therapy)).

    Time frame: At weeks 24 after baseline

  2. Quantitative change in DAS28-CRP

    in each treatment group (COMBI group (anti-TNF therapy + baricitinib) vs. MONO group (baricitinib conventional therapy)).

    Time frame: At weeks 24 after baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) in each treatment group

    Time frame: weeks 52 after baseline (Day 0)

  2. Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR20 response in each treatment group

    Time frame: At weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0)

  3. Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR70 response in each treatment group

    Time frame: At weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0)

  4. Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR50 response in each treatment group

    Time frame: At weeks 4 and 12 after baseline (Day 0)

  5. Proportion of patients who present a EULAR response according to DAS28-ESR, in each treatment group

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0)

  6. Proportion of patients who achieve remission or low disease activity according to DAS28-ESR in each treatment group

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0)

  7. Quantitative change in DAS28-ESR score (Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0 to 9.55 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included)

  8. Quantitative change in DAS28-CRP score between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0.96 to 9.04 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using C-Reactive Protein level (DAS28-CRP)

    Time frame: between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included)

  9. Quantitative change in sDAI score (simplified Disease Activity Index) between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0 to 100 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included)

  10. Quantitative change in cDAI score (clinical Disease Activity Index) between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0 to 76 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included)

  11. Proportion of patients who decrease the glucocorticosteroid dose ≤ 5 mg per day, sustained from week 12 to week 24, among patients with a baseline dose > 5 mg per day, in each treatment group.

    Time frame: At baseline (Day 0) and weeks 24 after baseline (Day 0)

  12. Drug retention rates in each treatment group

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0)

  13. Quantitative change in patient-reported outcome in each treatment group Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), varying from 0 to 3 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: between baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24 visit

  14. Quantitative change in patient-reported outcome in each treatment group

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACID)

    Time frame: between baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24 visit

  15. Quantitative change in patient-reported outcome in each treatment group Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire (RAID), varying from 0 to 10 with higher score means worse status.

    Time frame: between baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24 visit

  16. Proportion of participants maintaining an ACR50 response, remission or low disease activity in each treatment group.

    Time frame: at week 52 after baseline (Day 0)

  17. Quantitative change in DAS28-ESR score (Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) in each treatment group, varying from 0 to 9.55 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0)

  18. Quantitative change in DAS28-CRP score (Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using C-Reactive Protein level) in each treatment group, varying from 0.96 to 9.04 with higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0)

  19. Quantitative change in sDAI score (simplified Disease Activity Index) in each treatment group, varying from 0 to 100 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0)

  20. Quantitative change in cDAI score (clinical Disease Activity Index) in each treatment group, varying from 0 to 76 with higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0)

07

Study locations

36 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 68 months after the start.

Of 148 phase 3 interventional studies under Arthritis, Rheumatoid, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 68 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 26, 2021
First posted
May 3, 2021
StartActual
Jul 15, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Mar 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04870203
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company, Biogen, Ministry for Health and Solidarity, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2021
Start date
Jul 15, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 17, 2026

Study contacts

Christophe RICHEZ, Prof
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux
Edouard LHOMME, MD
study chair · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion