An observational study in Covid19, sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-15.
Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Observational
The primary objective of this study is to explore the physiological mechanism of awake, self proning among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure induced by COVID-19, using LUS in the first three days and explore the predictive value of LUS in patients' outcome.
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has recently gained popularity among the imaging methods to perform bedside assessment of critically ill patients to guide clinical management. LUS is a non-invasive and easy-to-perform procedure that provides precise data on lung aeration, lung recruitment, lung morphology, and lung perfusion. Studies have shown that LUS is a useful tool in monitoring lung reaeration in intubated patients diagnosed with traditional ARDS undergoing prone positioning; however there are mixed findings in terms of the use of LUS in predicting potential prone positioning response. A recent study found that the non-intubated COVID-19 patients who responded to prone positioning had more pronounced disturbances of aeration in posterior regions, however, they only investigated patients' response to the first prone positioning and the information for the patients' outcome is lacking. In our previous study with intubated COVID-19 patients, we found that patients' response to the subsequent prone positioning had higher predictive value than the response to the first prone positioning. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to explore the physiological mechanism of awake, self proning among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure induced by COVID-19, using LUS in the first three days and explore the predictive value of LUS in patients' outcome.
Rush University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 394 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.
Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (83%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who are admitted at Rush University Medical Center
Exclusion Criteria:
SpO2/FiO2 pre prone in day 1
Patients' response of oxygenation using SpO2/FiO2
Time frame: pre prone in day 1
SpO2/FiO2 post prone in day 1
Patients' response of oxygenation using SpO2/FiO2
Time frame: post prone in day 1
SpO2/FiO2 pre prone in day 2
Patients' response of oxygenation using SpO2/FiO2
Time frame: Pre prone in day 2
SpO2/FiO2 post prone in day 2
Patients' response of oxygenation using SpO2/FiO2
Time frame: Post prone in day 2
SpO2/FiO2 pre prone in day 3
Patients' response of oxygenation using SpO2/FiO2
Time frame: Pre prone in day 3
SpO2/FiO2 post prone in day 3
Patients' response of oxygenation using SpO2/FiO2
Time frame: Post prone in day 3
Lung Ultrasound Score pre prone in day 1
Patients' response of oxygenation using Lung ultrasound score
Time frame: Pre prone in day 1
Lung Ultrasound Score post prone in day 1
Patients' response of oxygenation using Lung ultrasound score
Time frame: Post prone in day 1
Lung Ultrasound Score pre prone in day 2
Patients' response of oxygenation using Lung ultrasound score
Time frame: Pre prone in day 2
Lung Ultrasound Score post prone in day 2
Patients' response of oxygenation using Lung ultrasound score
Time frame: Post prone in day 2
Lung Ultrasound Score pre prone in day 3
Patients' response of oxygenation using Lung ultrasound score
Time frame: Pre prone in day 3
Lung Ultrasound Score post prone in day 3
Patients' response of oxygenation using Lung ultrasound score
Time frame: Post prone in day 3
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Rush University Medical Center