An interventional study of High Energy preload and Low energy preload in Undernutrition and Underweight, sponsored by University of Glasgow. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-07.
Sponsored by University of Glasgow · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
This is a pilot study of children attending the Glasgow feeding clinic (GFC) which looks after children with severe feeding problems who commonly have low appetite and extreme thinness. The investigators want to find out if thin children respond to food in the same way, using an established method to assess energy compensation.
Thinness occurs as a result of undereating, but it is not always clear why an individual child has not eaten enough, or how to get them to eat more. There is a need to understand the child characteristics that predispose to undereating and the how these operate, in order to design more effective treatment and prevention programmes. The Glasgow feeding clinic (GFC) looks after a range of children with severe feeding problems who commonly have low appetite and extreme thinness.
A Ghanaian student will come to Glasgow, funded by the Glasgow University /Scottish funding council Global Challenges Research fund, to learn these techniques to use in future PhD research. The student will conduct a pilot study of children attending the GFC. The student will invite 40 families to complete our standardised online questionnaire (ICFET) about their child's eating behaviour and collate existing growth measurements as well as their feeding history.
A standardised energy compensation study will then be undertaken in 20 of the thinnest children. At two visits at least a week apart, the children will be given one of two similar tasting drinks in random order, one with very few calories and another with extra, without them knowing which is which. After 30 minutes they will eat as much as they want of a standardized lunch. All foods and drinks offered will be weighed before and after, to calculate the amount of energy eaten in total after the low energy drink, compared to the high energy drink.
1,277 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 230 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 118 across 843 interventional studies indexed under Malnutrition.
Browse Malnutrition studies →University of Glasgow is the lead sponsor of 145 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
No measurements
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Child will be given a high energy drink: a flavoured high energy milk or juice-based drink, used clinically to supplement the diet of preschool children (either Pediasure plus or Duocal). This will provide 1.5 kcals per ml in various flavours as preferred. The amount given will supply 10% of the child's daily energy requirements per Kg - for example for a 2-year-old child weighing 15 KG this would be 80 mls of drink supplying 120 Kcal. They will be given 10 minutes to drink the preload and 30 minutes after this they will eat lunch containing a range of pre-packaged foods of known energy content suitable for their age, chosen in consultation with the parents.
Behavioral: High Energy preload · Behavioral: Test meal
Child will be given a low energy drink of the same volume selected to be as similar as possible to the high energy drink, made either of skim milk or sugar free fruit juice, with a similar sugar free flavour; for above example this will supply 25 kcal. They will be given 10 minutes to drink the preload and 30 minutes after this they will eat lunch containing the same range of pre-packaged foods as above.
Behavioral: Low energy preload · Behavioral: Test meal
Tests the extent to which participants reduce their intake at a meal following ingestion of a high energy preload drink
Also known as: Satiation study
Tests the amount participants eat at a meal following ingestion of a low energy preload drink
Also known as: Satiation study
Test meal to follow low or high energy preload
Compensation index
The difference in energy consumed after high compared to low energy preload as percent of energy in preload
Time frame: Calculated on day 8, after consumption of 2nd test meal
total energy consumed per study day
The total amount of energy consumed form preload plus meal after high compared to low energy preload
Time frame: Calculated on day 8, after consumption of 2nd test meal
Plan to share: No — Data may be made available on request
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in Aug 2021, 3 months.
Of 392 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Malnutrition, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 37. This study's 3 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 418 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 37.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.