ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07704736Updated Jul 15, 2026

Evaluation of Community Food Markets in Glasgow, Scotland.

An interventional study of Food market stall in Living in Quintile 1 of Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, sponsored by University of Glasgow. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by University of Glasgow · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2026, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Researchers will evaluate if community-led food markets can improve access to affordable and nutritious food in lower income households in Glasgow. Through this study the researchers will compare an intervention group (areas of Glasgow with market) pre-and post- market, as well as to a comparator group (areas of Glasgow with no market), to see if the food market intervention improves access to affordable and nutritious foods.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • If community-led food markets increase per-person food purchase of fruits, vegetables, fish and fibre-rich products
  • If community-led food markets improve dietary intake of fruit and vegetables, fish and fibre-rich products

The study will also incorporate a process and economic evaluation of the market stalls.

Read the detailed description

Socioeconomic deprivation and individual and place deprivation are major drivers of poor diet and ill health in urban households across the UK. Food choices are shaped by the local food environment, culture, individual preferences, and economic and physical accessibility. Solutions to improve access and diet need multi-component approaches. Local food system transformation that facilitates access to sustainable diets that are affordable, nutritious, culturally acceptable, and derived through a people-centred approach is needed to address diet inequalities and promote health. This entails a systems approach with community and local stakeholders participating in the design and delivery of solutions to increase acceptance, participation, engagement and long-term sustainability.

Through a broad partnership in Glasgow supported by Glasgow University and local food organisations, two low-income areas of Glasgow have been selected to establish a weekly community-led food market stalls; Govan and Cranhill. The intention is that the implementation of these food market stalls will improve community members' access to nutritious food. The market stalls will be launched one at a time, developed in consultation with their local communities to ensure that they are appropriate to local needs and circumstances. The market stalls will operate on Saturdays and will run over 6 months each, focusing on providing affordable nutrient-rich foods and increasing exposure and familiarisation to raw ingredients. At one of the markets we will also incorporate food-related art performances and food information activities (e.g. cooking demonstrations) to support participant engagement and food literacy skills.

This study is an impact-, process- and economic- evaluation of the two community-led food market stalls, to explore if they are a viable intervention to improve access to affordable and nutritious food in these communities and enable households to meet dietary targets for fruit, vegetables, oily fish and fibre. We will measure the impact of these food markets to generate evidence to inform expansion of this concept to other localities in Glasgow and beyond. Using a quasi-experimental approach, we will compare an intervention group with a comparator group (areas of Glasgow with no market), pre-and post- market intervention. We will measure participant food purchases, eating behaviours, food literacy and markers of general health and wellbeing at time points (pre- and post- market intervention). We will do this using questionnaires, 24h diet recall and a 7-day food purchasing diary. In addition we will record market attendance and engagement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Living in Quintile 1 of Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation

Keywords

  • Glasgow
  • Scotland
  • Food market
  • Quasi experimental design
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Glasgow is the lead sponsor of 145 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility Criteria:

  • Residents living in Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 1 and 2 postcodes (localities Govan and Cranhill in Glasgow, Scotland)
  • Live in a 20 minute walk to the market stall interventions (Govan or Cranhill in Glasgow, Scotland).
  • Be age 18 or over
  • English speakers
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants living within a 20 minute walking area of the food market stall intervention.

    Other: Food market stall

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants living in areas with high levels of multiple deprivation, without a food market intervention in Glasgow.

Interventions

  • OtherFood market stall

    Affordable food market stalls set up in Govan and Cranhill, Glasgow. We will also incorporate food-related art performances and food information activities (e.g. cooking demonstrations) at the market to support participant engagement and food literacy skills.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the per-person purchase (portions/week) of fruits, vegetables, oily fish and fibre-rich products at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by a 7 day food purchasing diary.

    Participants will complete a 7 day food purchasing diary before (baseline) and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Number of purchased portions of fruits, vegetables, fish and fibre-rich products per week will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the per-person purchase (portions/week) of fruits, vegetables, oily fish and fibre-rich products at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by a food purchasing frequency questionnaire.

    Participants will complete a food purchasing frequency questionnaire using an ordinal data scale before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Number of purchased portions of fruits, vegetables, fish and fibre-rich products will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  2. Change from Baseline in the per-person dietary intake (portions/day) of fruits, vegetables, oily fish and fibre (g/day) at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by a food intake frequency questionnaire.

    Participants will complete a food intake frequency questionnaire using an ordinal data scale before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Number of portions per day of fruits, vegetables, oily fish and fibre (g/day) will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  3. Change from Baseline in the per-person dietary intake (portions/day) of fruits, vegetables, oily fish and fibre (g/day) at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by an interviewer led 24h diet recall.

    Participants will complete an interviewer led 24h diet recall before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Number of portions per day of fruits, vegetables, oily fish and fibre (g/day) will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  4. Change from Baseline in participant food shopping frequency habits and food sourcing locations at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by a food shopping frequency questionnaire.

    Participants will complete a questionnaire on food shopping frequencies at various food retail outlets using an ordinal data scale before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Shopping frequency (visits/week) at various food retail outlets will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  5. Change from Baseline in participant expenses (£/week) on food shopping at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by a 7 day food purchasing diary.

    Participants complete a 7 day food purchasing diary before (baseline) and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Food shopping expenses (£/week) will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  6. Change from Baseline in participant expenses (£/week) on food shopping at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by a participant estimate of weekly expenditure.

    Participants will complete a question on estimated weekly expenditure (£) on food shopping using an ordinal data scale before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Food shopping expenses (£/week) will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  7. Change from Baseline in participant food literacy at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by the "sustainable food literacy" questionnaire.

    Participants will complete a questionnaire sustainable food literacy using a Likert scale before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Food literacy levels will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  8. Change from Baseline in participant food security status at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by the FAO Food Insecurity Experience Scale.

    Participants will complete the FAO Food Insecurity Experience Scale questionnaire before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Levels of Food Insecurity will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  9. Change from Baseline in participant quality of life at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

    Participants will complete the EQ-5D questionnaire before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Quality of life as reported by their EQ-5D-5L index values will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  10. Change from Baseline in participant quality of life at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by the ICE-CAP A questionnaire.

    Participants will complete the ICE-CAP A questionnaire before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Quality of life as reported by their ICE-CAP A index values will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  11. Change from Baseline in participant health at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by BMI (kg/m^2).

    Participants will report their height (m) and weight (kg) before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Participant health as reported by their calculated BMI (kg/m\^2) will be compared (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2).

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  12. Change from Baseline in participant health at 6 Months after market stall intervention, as assessed by the Bristol Stool Chart.

    Participants will report their stool type via the Bristol Stool Chart (types 1-7) before and 6 months after the market stall implementation. Participant health as reported by their stool type (1-7) will be compared.

    Time frame: From enrolment until the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  13. Process evaluation of the market stall intervention, as assessed by a participant survey.

    A process evaluation will assess the implementation of the intervention in terms of participant satisfaction with the food prices, food variety, and quality of produce at the market stall intervention using market day surveys based on rating scales.

    Time frame: Market day surveys will be done at each market stall during the 6 month intervention.

  14. Process evaluation of the market stall intervention, as assessed by semi-structured interviews.

    A process evaluation will assess the implementation of the intervention in terms of participant satisfaction with the food prices, food variety, and quality of produce at the market stall intervention using semi-structured interviews with market attendees.

    Time frame: Semi-structured interviews will be done at the end of the 6 month market intervention.

  15. An economic evaluation "Value for Money" of the market stall intervention will be assessed using cost-effectiveness analysis with a risk-adjusted net present value.

    Cost-effectiveness will be assessed over a 12-month horizon using cost-per-primary outcome/QALY, and through a societal perspective. Longer-term cost-effectiveness will be modelled.

    Time frame: This will be completed following the 6 month market intervention.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lean ME, Anderson AS, Morrison C, Currall J. Evaluation of a dietary targets monitor. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 May;57(5):667-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601596. PubMed 12771967 ↗
  • Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):167-76. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9927-2. Epub 2011 May 20. PubMed 21598064 ↗
  • Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087. PubMed 11491192 ↗
  • Gorham G, Dulin-Keita A, Risica PM, Mello J, Papandonatos G, Nunn A, Gorham S, Roberson M, Gans KM. Effectiveness of Fresh to You, a Discount Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Market in Low-Income Neighborhoods, on Children's Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, Rhode Island, 2010-2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Oct 15;12:E176. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140583. PubMed 26469949 ↗
  • Sauveplane-Stirling V, Crichton D, Tessier S, Parrett A, Garcia AL. The food retail environment and its use in a deprived, urban area of Scotland. Public Health. 2014 Apr;128(4):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.11.005. Epub 2014 Apr 13. PubMed 24726006 ↗
  • Chambers S, Barton KL, Albani V, Anderson AS, Wrieden WL. Identifying dietary differences between Scotland and England: a rapid review of the literature. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Oct;20(14):2459-2477. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001380. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PubMed 28724456 ↗

Related links

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 22 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 30, 2026
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
StartActual
Feb 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Jul 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07704736
Collaborators
Cranhill Development Trust, Dig In, Glasgow City Food Plan, Glasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow Food Policy Partnership, The Glasgow School of Art
Responsible party
Ada Garcia (Senior Lecturer, University of Glasgow) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Feb 2, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Study contacts

Ada Garcia
Contact
Ada.Garcia@glasgow.ac.uk
+441419560465

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion