ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04850703LPEUpdated Apr 12, 2023

Brain Networks Implicated in Lifelong Premature Ejaculation Patients

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Transcranial Radom Noise Stimulation and Take Dapoxetine in Premature Ejaculation and Sexual Dysfunction, sponsored by Moises Domingo. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to male participants aged 30 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-12.

Sponsored by Moises Domingo · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Using Brain Mapping and Cognitive ERPs, the investigatos have searched for a Brain Networks involved during Inhibitory Control in Lifelong Premature Ejaculation (LPE) participants. The investigators have designed a clinical trial comparing placebo with tDCS and blacebo group against Dapoxetine, studying the effects on LPE, as well as side effects and their medium and long-term duration.

Read the detailed description

Lifelong premature ejaculation (LPE) is a very common male sexual dysfunction like erectile dysfunction. It produces great distress to sexual harmony and even fertility. Previous neurophysiology studies revealed an ejaculation-related control mechanism in the brain: left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activation during successful inhibition. If we use the left IFG as a seed, participants showed weaker resting-state functional connectivity (FC) activity, between the seed and two areas (left dentate nucleus (DN) and right frontal pole) compared with controls.

The main goal is to compare whether the brain biomarker only exists in participants with LPD and how it responds to treatment with Dapoxetine and with tDCS against the IFG networks and lDN, measuring the connectivity changes in these brain networks and FC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Premature Ejaculation
  • Sexual Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Brain Mapping
  • EEG
  • ERP
  • tDCS
  • tRNS
  • Dapoxetine
  • Lifelong premature ejaculation
  • central inhibitory network function
  • inferior frontal gyrus
  • dentate nucleus
  • right frontal pole
  • Resting State Networks
  • Funtional connectivity
03

In context

Premature Ejaculation

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Ejaculation; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 128 is above the median of 84 across 89 interventional studies indexed under Premature Ejaculation.

Browse Premature Ejaculation studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Moises Domingo as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • To be over 18 years old and less than 70 years
  • Best-practice diagnosed Longlife Premature ejaculation
  • Diagnosed since at least one years prior to enrollment.
  • No use drugs or medicines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious visual and hearing loss
  • Brain injury following cranial trauma
  • Other neurological disorders like Parkinson, ME, headache, etc.
  • Birth trauma
  • Mental retardation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Premature Ejaculation participants who receive Brain Weak Currents in IFG brain cortex

    Participants receive tRNS (weak currents \< 2 mA) sessions at IFG brain cortex for 25 minutes 2 times a day 3 times per week during 3 weeks. After 4 hours they end the last session, a new brain mapping is performed.

    Device: Transcranial Radom Noise Stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Premature Ejaculation participants who take Dapoxetine

    Participants take 1 tablet of the drug between 1 and 3 hours before the brain mapping

    Drug: Take Dapoxetine

  • Sham comparator
    Placebo Group

    Participants who do not take medication or receive tRNS sessions

    Combination Product: Comparation EEG changes between Sham Group against tRNS and Dapoxetin participants

  • Other
    Controls

    44 Healthy humans not clinically not diagnosed with LPD and withouth expression the LPE endophenotype. In this way, the investigators what would be the patients diagnosed clinically with LPE who present the endophenotype or neurophysiological biomarker of LPE.

    Diagnostic Test: Compare LPE EEG endophenotype between participants and healthy controls

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Radom Noise Stimulation

    tRNS against Dapoxetine in LPE patients

    Also known as: tRNS

  • DrugTake Dapoxetine

    Dapoxetine against tRNS in LPE patients

  • Combination productComparation EEG changes between Sham Group against tRNS and Dapoxetin participants

    Compare EEG parameters like Theta Rhythm and Coherence between three groups of participants: sham, tRNS participants and Dapoxetine participants groups.

  • Diagnostic testCompare LPE EEG endophenotype between participants and healthy controls

    Define as precisely as possible the electrophysiological endophenotype of Longlife Premature Ejaculation, using healthy humans who do not express the LPE EEG endophenotype

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wavelet Changes define Brain Biomarker of LPE

    The investigators will reported changes in wavelet (time-frequencies) in Left Prefrontal Lobe F3, F7 and Fz electrodes.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. EEG coherence comparing Dapoxetine against tRNS

    The investigators will reported changes in brain connectivity comparing taking Dapoxetine with the use of tRNS, calculating EEG coherence.

    Time frame: 2-3 months

  3. Adverse events comparing Dapoxetine against tRNS

    Report adverse events during the application of the protocol Dapoxetine / tRNS.

    Time frame: 2-3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measure the effect of Dapoxetine through ERP Novelty Wave comparing with the values of the controls

    Changes in latencies and amplitude of Novelty wave in the Ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex comparing novelty wave in Dapoxetine group against controls.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Measure the effect of tRNS through ERP Novelty Wave changes comparing with the values of the controls

    Changes in latencies and amplitude of Novelty wave in the Ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex comparing novelty wave in tRNS group against controls.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Salud Valclinic
    Valencia, 46900, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04850703
Lead sponsor
Moises Domingo
Collaborators
Dr. Alejandro Molina Cabeza, Susana Ferrandis Martinez
Responsible party
Moises Domingo (Sub Investigator, Spanish Foundation for Neurometrics Development) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 20, 2021
Start date
Feb 2, 2021
Primary completion
May 21, 2022
Completion
Feb 4, 2023
Last update
Apr 12, 2023

Study contacts

Alejandro Molina Cabeza, MD
principal investigator · Sexual Salud Valclinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion