CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04845789Updated Apr 15, 2021

Case Manager Approach in Dementia Care From a Caregiver Perspective

An observational study in Dementia, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-15.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a qualitative study to explore opinions of family caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia on case manager approach in dementia care. Semi-structured interviews will be used for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to recruit caregivers from Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing. Grounded Theory would be used for data analysis.

Read the detailed description

This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit caregivers from Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing.

Study protocol would be explained by principal investigator (PI) to case managers in JCCPA, including aim and objectives of the study, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria and interview questions.

Due to privacy issues, case managers in JCCPA would screen family caregivers and ask for consent to participate in the study. Contact method of caregivers would be provided to PI by JCCPA case managers upon caregivers' consent. PI would then approach caregivers to arrange online meetings and send the online consent form to them for their consideration and reference. Risks and benefits of the study and the right to withdraw from the study at any time would be explained to participants before consent form was signed by participants digitally.

Demographic data such as age, gender, education level, years of caregiving to PWD and time spent on caregiving would be collected using Google form.

All interviews were conducted through video-conferencing individually. Each interview took 30 to 45 minutes. The interviews were started with an close-ended question, such as "Do you know the special approach that JCCPA has adopted?" and "Did the staff tell you about it at admission?", followed up by open-ended questions such as "What do you know about case management?" and "Can you tell me how your caregiving experience was with case manager support?". Subsequent probing questions aimed at clarification and gaining more insight on their experience, was guided by the participant's responses.

Demographic data such as age, gender, education level, years of caregiving to PWD and time spent on caregiving would be collected using Google form.

All interviews were conducted through video-conferencing individually. Each interview took 30 to 45 minutes. The interviews were started with an close-ended question, such as "Do you know the special approach that JCCPA has adopted?" and "Did the staff tell you about it at admission?", followed up by open-ended questions such as "What do you know about case management?" and "Can you tell me how your caregiving experience was with case manager support?". Subsequent probing questions aimed at clarification and gaining more insight on their experience, was guided by the participant's responses. Video-conferencing software such as Zoom, Google Meet, or facetime would be used for online interview. Interview would be conducted in JCCPA to ensure privacy of the participants.

All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcript were validated by re-listening to the tapes.

Constant comparative analysis was used for coding and category development. Incidents were identified in the data and coded. Initially, codes were identified as much as possible. Codes were compared to others codes. Codes were then collapsed into categories. In this process, incidents in a category were compared with previous incidents. New data was compared with data obtained earlier during the analysis phases. In intermediate coding, basic data was transformed into more abstract concepts allowing the theory to emerge from the data. Then, advanced coding was done to facilitate integration of the final grounded theory.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dementia

2,172 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 250 across 482 observational studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 487 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Family caregivers of person with dementia

Inclusion criteria

  • care recipients having clinical diagnosis of dementia of any stage
  • participants being the family caregivers of care recipients, providing care for at least 10 hours per week
  • caregivers receiving case manager support for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • caregivers who were under age of 18 and those exhibiting intellectual impairment
  • caregivers who were not immediate family members of care recipients
  • caregivers who could not communicate in Cantonese or English
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Family caregivers

    Family caregivers who were main caregiver to the person with dementia and who spent at least 10 hours a week providing care to the person with dementia.

    Other: Non-interventional

Interventions

  • OtherNon-interventional

    Non-interventional. Interview would be conducted for data collection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Semi-structured interview would be conducted individually

    for data collection to explore the perspective of family caregivers on case manager approach in dementia care.

    Time frame: 2/5/2021-31/7/2021

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing
    Shatin, NT 0000, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD that underlie results in a publication. No identifying information about the individual would be revealed by using subject number

Supporting information: Study protocol, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04845789
Lead sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing
Responsible party
Lui Kam Yan (Principal investigator, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 15, 2021
Start date
May 2, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2021

Study contacts

Kam Yan Lui, Miss
Contact
1155138933@link.cuhk.edu.hk
+85263329630
Kam Yan Lui, Miss
principal investigator · Chinese University of Hong Kong

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion