CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04839263Updated Apr 14, 2021

Fast-track in Minimally Invasive Gynaecology

An interventional study of "FAST TRACK" protocol in Gynecologic Disease, sponsored by University Hospital, Geneva. Completed at 2 sites in Switzerland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-14.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Geneva · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2015, registered Mar 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
170
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Objective: Evaluate the effects of a fast-track (FT) protocol on costs and postoperative recovery.

Design: randomized trial

Setting: University Hospitals

Population: 170 women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication

Methods: A FT protocol included the combination of minimally invasive surgery, analgesia optimization, early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization of patients was compared to a usual care protocol.

Main outcomes measure: Primary outcome was costs. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, postoperative morbidity and patient satisfaction.

Read the detailed description
  1. Fast-Track protocol:

    Preoperative

    • Anesthetic consultation
    • Proposal of optimization of patient's general health state + family meeting if necessary
    • Hospitalization on day of surgery
    • Solids stopped 6 hours prior to surgery, drinking encouraged up to 2 hours prior to surgery

    During surgery

    • Anti-infectious prophylaxis
    • Anesthesia via IV propofol/remifentanil
    • Anti-nausea prophylaxis
    • Pain control based on limited systemic opioid use

    Postoperative

    • Balanced analgesia for pain control
    • Antithrombotic prophylaxis
    • Early oral refeeding
    • Rapid mobilization
    • Gum chewing
    • Foley catheter removal at the end of surgery
    • Peripheral IV catheter removal 6 hours postoperatively
  2. Usual care protocol :

Preoperative

  • Anesthetic consultation
  • Hospitalization on day of surgery
  • Fasting beginning at midnight prior to surgery

During surgery

  • Anti-infectious prophylaxis
  • Balanced anesthesia via halogen gas
  • Anti-nausea medication if needed

Postoperative

  • Balanced analgesia for pain control
  • Antithrombotic prophylaxis
  • Same-day refeeding according to patient's wish
  • Same-day mobilization according to patient's wish
  • Foley and peripheral IV catheter removal on day 1 postoperatively
02

Conditions studied

  • Gynecologic Disease

Keywords

  • fast-track
  • laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • hospital costs
03

In context

Genital Diseases, Female

154 studies on the registry are indexed under Genital Diseases, Female; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 170 is above the median of 80 across 111 interventional studies indexed under Genital Diseases, Female.

Browse Genital Diseases, Female studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Geneva is the lead sponsor of 372 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the requirement for an additional surgical procedure, such as prolapse repair or urinary incontinence, because a prolonged operative time could compromise early patient discharge and
  • the inability to speak French because the patients were required to complete their data collection logbook in French.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
170 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    "FAST TRACK" protocol

    "FAST TRACK" protocol Preoperative evaluation and information Patient general health state optimization proposal prior to hospitalization: Preoperative strategy: * Hospitalization on surgery day * No prolonged fasting Perioperative strategy: * Pain control based on limited systemic opioid therapy use * Anti-nausea prophylaxis * Anaesthesia via IV propofol / remifentanyl * Bladder catheter removal postoperative Postoperative strategy: * Pain control using balanced analgesia * Gum chewing * Early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization * Venflon removal 6 hours post-op

    Procedure: "FAST TRACK" protocol

  • No intervention
    "Conventional setting" protocol

    "Conventional setting" protocol Preoperative strategy: * Hospitalization on surgery day * Fasting as of midnight prior to the day of surgery Perioperative strategy: - Balanced anaesthesia via halogens gases Postoperative strategy: * Same day refeeding and mobilization minimum 6 hours post operation * Bladder catheter and Venflon removal on day 1

Interventions

  • Procedure"FAST TRACK" protocol

    Preoperative evaluation and information Patient general health state optimization proposal prior to hospitalization: Preoperative strategy: * Hospitalization on surgery day * No prolonged fasting Perioperative strategy: * Pain control based on limited systemic opioid therapy use * Anti-nausea prophylaxis * Anaesthesia via IV propofol / remifentanyl * Bladder catheter removal postoperative Postoperative strategy: * Pain control using balanced analgesia * Gum chewing * Early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization * Venflon removal 6 hours post-op

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital costs and ambulatory costs

    The economic evaluation covered hospital inpatient surgical care costs and ambulatory costs. Resource inputs were divided into two main categories: (1) hospital inpatient surgical costs and (2) ambulatory costs further divided into (2a) hospital-related costs (A\&E Department consultations and hospital readmission) and (2b) community costs (community health + social costs and caregiver's loss of production costs). Hospital costs were collected using a computerized hospital information system developed by the University Hospitals of Geneva. The patients recorded community costs in a logbook containing the community health and social invoices and caregivers' number of absent working days. Caregivers' loss of production was extrapolated via Switzerland's median wage per working day.

    Time frame: Up to 1 month postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital length of stay

    Hospital stay was retrieved from the computerized patient record

    Time frame: Up to 1 month postoperative

  2. Postoperative morbidity rate during the first postoperative month

    Morbidity during the first postoperative month was monitored via patient consultations at the Accident and Emergency (A\&E) Department

    Time frame: Up to 1 month postoperative

  3. Satisfaction assessed by a three-point likert scale

    Patient satisfaction was evaluated on their day of discharge and at their 1-month postoperative follow-up visit based on a three-point likert scale regarding their satisfaction with the care they received. The likert scale ranged from 0 (unsatisfied) to 2 (satisfied).

    Time frame: Up to 1 month postoperative

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • HUG
    Geneva, Switzerland
  • University Hospitals
    Geneva, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. 2. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbølle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg. 2000 Jul;232(1):51-7. 3. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002 Jun;183(6):630-41. 4. Kehlet H, Büchler MW, Beart RW Jr, Billingham RP, Williamson R. Care after colonic operation--is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):45-54. 5. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005 Jun;24(3):466-77.
  • Lambat Emery S, Brossard P, Petignat P, Boulvain M, Pluchino N, Dallenbach P, Wenger JM, Savoldelli GL, Rehberg-Klug B, Dubuisson J. Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes. Front Surg. 2021 Nov 11;8:773653. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.773653. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34859043 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 29, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04839263
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva
Responsible party
Shahzia Lambat (Chief resident, University Hospital, Geneva) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2021
Completion
Mar 1, 2021
Last update
Apr 14, 2021

Study contacts

Shahzia Lambat
principal investigator · HUG

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion