ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04838665Updated Apr 9, 2021

Changes in Vital Signs and Pupil Diameter Related to Pharmacologic Mydriasis in Premature Infants: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine and 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine in Retinopathy of Prematurity, sponsored by University of the Philippines. Completed. Open to participants aged 1 Week to 32 Weeks, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-09.

Sponsored by University of the Philippines · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2011, registered Feb 2021).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Week to 32 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the common anatomic causes of blindness among Filipinos, accounting for 47.7% of the cases. With this retinopathy being preventable and treatable, ROP screening has been proven to be effective in preventing blindness, which is achieved with the usage of mydriatics. Even if the regimen of multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine is the one recommended by international guidelines for ROP screening, the mydriatic regimen used by many of the country's institutions is the single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine applied via a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW). There have been no studies yet on the safety and efficacy in premature infants of this mydriatic preparation and method, although it is hypothesized that the usage of a cotton wick promotes the possible systemic effects of the mydriatic combination used.

This study then aims to determine the safety and efficacy of different mydriatic regimens in premature infants referred for screening of ROP using (1) multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% cyclopentolate hydrochloride and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI), (2) single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI), and (3) single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW) in a tertiary Philippine hospital.

This study was designed as a randomized, double blind, clinical study which enrolled sixty preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from January to July 2011. With instillations via MAI, SI, and SIW, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and oxygen saturation were monitored from ten minutes prior to instillation up to forty-five minutes after instillation. Pupil dilations were also measured at the forty-fifth minute.

Read the detailed description

I. Introduction Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the common anatomic causes of blindness among Filipinos, accounting for 47.7% of the cases. With this retinopathy being preventable and treatable, ROP screening has been proven to be effective in preventing blindness, which is achieved with the usage of mydriatics. Even if the regimen of multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine is the one recommended by international guidelines for ROP screening, the mydriatic regimen usually used by many of the country's institutions is the regimen of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine applied via a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix. There have been no studies yet on the safety and efficacy in premature infants of this mydriatic preparation and method, although it is hypothesized that the usage of a cotton wick promotes the possible systemic effects of the mydriatic combination used.

II. Significance It is the aim of this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the mydriatic regimens we use in our institution and compare it to the recommendation by the UK ROP Guidelines. In doing so, this study aims to (1) document vital sign changes in the infant during dilation, (2) identify adverse systemic changes due to the mydriatic regimen and (3) provide appropriate interventions and recommendations to address these adverse effects. These will greatly improve the ROP screening process in our institution.

III. Objectives The general objective is to determine vital sign changes related to Pupil Dilation among preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Wards and Eye Instrumentation Center of the Philippine General Hospital (PGH). Specifically, its objective is to compare the vital sign changes and mydriasis in (1) multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride + 2.5% Phenylephrine (MAI) (2) single instillation of 0.5%/0.5% Phenylephrine + Tropicamide (SI) and (3) single instillation of 0.5%/0.5% Phenylephrine + Tropicamide with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW).

IV. Methodology This study was designed as a randomized, double blind, clinical study which enrolled sixty preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from January to July 2011. Each subject was randomly distributed into the standard, instillation, and packing group. To avoid observer bias, two investigators were involved per monitoring during dilation. The first investigator was assigned only to place the monitoring devices and to administer the mydriatics contained in unmarked 1 mL syringe which content was unknown to him.

The vital signs monitored during dilation were blood pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP)), heart rates and oxygen saturations using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors. A digital camera and a millimeter rule were used to approximate size of pupil dilatation. Measurement of all the vital signs and pupil dilation from a subject was derived from a single dilation session only.

Prior to data collection up to the end of monitoring, other factors that may affect the vital signs of the preterm infants were addressed. This included hunger, cold temperature, and soiled diapers.

Baseline vital signs determination was then performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is a significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior to the initial drop.

For the MAI, multiple alternate drops of 0.5% cyclopentolate then 2.5% phenylephrine every 5 minutes in two doses were instilled (total of 0.2 milliliter of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 0.2 millimeter of 2.5% Phenylephrine). Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor was placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference.

For the SI, only a drop of 0.5%/0.5% tropicamide + phenylephrine was properly instilled at time 0 (total of 0.1 milliliter). Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor was placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference.

For the SIW, a cotton wisp soaked with a drop of 0.5%/0.5% tropicamide + phenylephrine was placed on the lower fornix in each eye of the infant (total of 0.1 milliliter). The weight of the cotton wisp was standardized at 0.02 milligram using a digital weighing scale. Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor is placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference. Pictures were uploaded into the computer monitor for the actual measurement.

Vital sign changes were monitored using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors. In the presence of significant vital sign changes, immediate intervention will be done.

In the presence of a significant increase in BP or heart rate, the infant will be observed. Both changes are expected from undergoing a stressful procedure such as placing a lid retractor in measuring the pupil dilation. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work up should tachycardia persist even after the examination. The blood pressure, heart rate and sensorium will be continuously monitored so as to avoid any ensuing bradycardia.

In the presence of a significant drop in BP, the infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work up to determine the possible source. Fluid challenge will be done to check if the cause of hypotension is just attributable to hypovolemia. The investigator will determine body temperature to check for hypothermia. If hypothermic, slow rewarming will be done by placing back the infant inside a close incubator or beside a radiant warmer. Blood glucose will be checked for hypoglycemia. Should hyperglycemia be detected, the infant can be started on 2cc/kg D5water. Infant will be worked up for infection as well.

During events of hypoxia or oxygen desaturation of less than 85%, the infant will be given supportive ventilation as required. Oxygen saturation will be monitored using the pulse oximeter. In the event of an apnea happening, supportive ventilation will be provided immediately, together with significant stimulation. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for possible intubation.

In the event of bradycardia, significant stimulation will be started on the infant. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work-up to determine the cause. The investigator is also to determine body temperature to check for hypothermia. If hypothermic, slow rewarming will be done by placing back the infant inside a close incubator or beside a radiant warmer. Blood glucose will be determined to check for hypoglycemia. Should hyperglycemia be detected, the infant can be started on 2cc/kg D5water. Infant can be worked up for infection as well.

In the event that a subject suffers from any of the abovementioned adverse effects, the appropriate interventions cited will be administered free of charge. Should the adverse effects believed by the investigators to be secondary to the ROP screening only and additional expenses are needed to procure medicines or equipment, the investigators will shoulder the expenses. If the medicine or equipment is immediately needed, the relative may spend first for them and have the expenses reimbursed with the investigators later. Should the amount to procure the said medicine or equipment cannot be produced by the relative, the investigators can be immediately contacted to assist the relatives immediately. All other expenses will be shouldered by the investigators through reimbursements. Expenses amounting to P500 for the medicine and P1000 for the equipment will be shouldered by the investigators. Should it exceed these limits, the infant will be referred to any charitable institution for further assistance.

The blood pressure (systole, diastole and MAP), HR and oxygen saturation obtained during dilatation were analyzed. They were graphed to determine patterns from baseline up to 45 minutes. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess statistical significance for oxygen saturation, being a non-parametric variable. Poor dilatation among ROP patients with the advanced disease will be noted. A subgroup analysis was also done to determine the any relationship between the amounts of mydriatic used to the weight of the infant.

An interim analysis was done within the study to assess if the two mydriatic regimens were particularly beneficial or harmful compared to the concurrent standard group. Either the Pocock or the Flemming method will be used to decide if this study needed to terminate earlier than planned. Unblinding can be done should it be made necessary during the interim analysis or during course of the study. This protocol was submitted to the PGH ERB for ethics review and approval. It was conducted only upon approval from the ERB. All patient information were anonymized and are confidential. There is no funding received by the investigators for the conduct of this research.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retinopathy of Prematurity
03

In context

Retinopathy of Prematurity

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 82 across 102 interventional studies indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Browse Retinopathy of Prematurity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of the Philippines is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Week to 32 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • birth weight of less than 1500 g
  • gestational age of 32 weeks or less
  • an unstable clinical course who are believed to be at high risk for Retinopathy of Prematurity, as assessed by their individual attendings

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria cited that

  • infants with cardiac abnormalities directly affecting the heart rate and oxygen saturation
  • infants with inotropic medications
  • infants with ventilatory support
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI)

    20 infants were enrolled in Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI)

    Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine · Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine · Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick

  • Experimental
    Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI)

    Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI)

    Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine · Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine · Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick

  • Experimental
    1 instillation of 0.5% tropicamide +0.5% phenylephrine w/a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix

    Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW)

    Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine · Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine · Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick

Interventions

  • Drug0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine

    Drug pages: Cyclopentolate · Phenylephrine

    Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI) dropped every 5 minutes for two doses

    Also known as: Multiple Alternate Instillation of Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Dilate® Micro Labs Limited Bangalore and Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Mydfrin™ 25mg/mL (2.5%) Alcon Fort Worth Texas

  • Drug0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine

    Drug pages: Tropicamide · Phenylephrine

    Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine

    Also known as: Single instillation of Tropicamide + Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Sanmyd-P 0.5%/0.5% Santen Osaka Japan

  • Drug0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick

    Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick weighing 0.02 milligrams placed in the inferior fornix for the entire 45 minutes

    Also known as: Single instillation of Tropicamide + Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Sanmyd-P 0.5%/0.5% Santen Osaka Japan with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix weighing 0.02 milligrams

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Systolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure changes

    Measured in mmHg using a well-fitted neonatal cuff placed in the arm connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors

    Time frame: A baseline systolic blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 minute prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the v/s between 10 and 5 minutes

  2. Diastolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure changes

    Measured in mmHg using a well-fitted neonatal cuff placed in the arm connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors

    Time frame: A baseline diastolic blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5

  3. Mean arterial blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure changes

    Measured in mmHg using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors

    Time frame: A baseline mean arterial blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 mins. prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 an

  4. Heart rate

    Measured in beats per minute using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors

    Time frame: A baseline heart rate determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior

  5. Oxygen saturation

    Measured in percent saturation using a pulse oximeter connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors

    Time frame: A baseline heart rate determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior

  6. Pupil diameter

    Measuring using a digital camera and a millimeter ruler

    Time frame: Measured at the 45th minute post-instillation of the specified intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful retinopathy of prematurity screening

    Whether or not a successful ROP screening was carried out

    Time frame: After the 45th minute measurement of pupil diameter

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2011 to primary completion in Sep 2011, 0 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2021
First posted
Apr 9, 2021
StartActual
Sep 30, 2011
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2011
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2011
Last update
Apr 9, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04838665
Lead sponsor
University of the Philippines
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2021
Start date
Sep 30, 2011
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2011
Completion
Sep 30, 2011
Last update
Apr 9, 2021

Study contacts

Roland Joseph D Tan, MD
principal investigator · University of the Philippines Manila

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Cyclopentolate · Phenylephrine · Tropicamide

Start the discussion