CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04832334Updated Dec 10, 2021

Investigation Of The Relationship Between Imagery Ability, Balance And Functionality After Stroke

An observational study in Stroke, Motor İmagery Ability and Mental Chronometry, sponsored by Medipol University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-10.

Sponsored by Medipol University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It was aimed to determine the relationship between post-stroke imagination ability, balance, and functionality, and to compare the motor imagery skills of those who had stroke with compatible healthy individuals.

Read the detailed description

İn the study, 20 individuals with hemiplegic or chronic hemiparesis who agreed to participate by signing the voluntary consent form, who meet the inclusion criteria, and 20 healthy individuals who are similar in terms of age, gender and education level will be included.

The individuals included in the study will be divided into two groups:

Group 1: Stroke Patients Group 2: Control Group

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Motor İmagery Ability
  • Mental Chronometry
  • Balance
  • Functionality

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • motor imagery
  • mental chronometry
  • balance
  • functionality
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 160 across 1,692 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Medipol University is the lead sponsor of 311 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

In this study, we will enroll patients based on the statistics of the articles titled "Motor imagery in stroke patients or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases" and "Effects of a single mental chronometry training session in subacute stroke patients - a randomized controlled trial". We calculated the power analysis from this article. According to this calculated; α=0.05, 1-β=0.90, effect size=0.96.

Stroke patients treated at Istanbul Medipol University Pendik Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic Neurology Rehabilitation Unit and healthy individuals matching them will be included.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Post-stroke hemiplegia or chronic hemiparesis
  • Not having any neurological disorder other than stroke
  • Not having vision problems that will affect the materials to be used during the treatment.
  • To be able to communicate enough to understand the orders given
  • Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score of 24 and above
  • Not having seen a visualization application before

Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Participants:

  • Being between the ages of 40-80
  • To be similar in terms of age, gender, education level of individuals with stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having an advanced degree of aphasia
  • Unilateral neglect
  • Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score below 24 points
  • Multiple stroke history
  • Having pain and limitation of joint motion that will interfere with functional activity
  • Walking restriction
  • Serious communication or understanding problems
  • Presence of serious cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic or orthopedic problems
  • Presence of a secondary neurological disease
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Stroke Participants

    Stroke patients with hemiplegia or chronic hemiparesis

    Other: Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test. · Other: Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test · Other: Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale

  • Healthy Participants

    The healthy control group was matched with stroke participants in terms of age, gender, dominant side and education level.

    Other: Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test. · Other: Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test · Other: Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale

Interventions

  • OtherKinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test.

    Imagery ability was determined.

  • OtherBerg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test

    Balance level was determined.

  • OtherTimed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale

    Functionality was evaluated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl - Meyer Motor Recovery Assessment Form

    It will only be evaluated in the stroke group. It is a scale that evaluates sensorimotor recovery after stroke. Each parameter was scored as 0 points: unsuccessful, 1 point: partially successful, 2 points: completely successful performance on the scale, which includes 50 items specific to stroke and based on performance. The maximum score that can be taken for the upper extremity in the scale where voluntary movement, reflex activity, grip, coordination and speed are evaluated is 66 and 34 for the lower extremity.

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Mini-Mental State Test

    It was used to determine the cognitive state. The Mini-Mental State Test was first published by Folstein et al. It consists of eleven items under 5 main headings: orientation, record memory, attention and calculation, recall and language, and the total score is evaluated over 30 points. The ideal threshold value of the Mini-Mental State Test was found to be 24.

    Time frame: Day 0

  3. Clock Drawing Test

    It will be used to assess the phenomenon of neglect of the stroke individual. The individual is asked to draw a clock circle and insert the numbers of the clock into it. After finishing the numbers, the hands of the clock are placed to show 11 to 10 past.

    Time frame: Day 0

  4. Digit Span Test

    This test to evaluate the ability to sustain attention is a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Revised battery. The test consists of two parts as forward and reverse range. In both parts, random numbers are read to the person at one second intervals, the numbers increase with each attempt and the person is asked to repeat in the same way. In both episodes, the number of digits of the previous sequence in which the person failed twice in a row constitutes the range. The maximum score that can be obtained for each section is 7, and a total of 14 points for the whole test.

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. Kinesthetic and Visual Imaging Questionnaire

    The Kinesthetic and Visual Imaging Questionnaire has been developed to evaluate the imagination ability in individuals with physical disabilities. The purpose of the questionnaire is to determine to what extent individuals visualize and feel the movements they imagine.

    Time frame: Day 0

  6. Box and Block Test

    It is a highly sensitive test for changes in upper extremity functional performance. However, this study will be used for evaluating mental chronometry ability rather than functional performance.

    Time frame: Day 0

  7. Functional Independence Scale

    It is a scale used to evaluate the motor and cognitive competence of patients in daily life activities. Scale; It consists of 18 items that evaluate six functions: self-care, sphincter control, transfer, displacement, communication, and social perception. Each item is scored between 1 (activity fully dependent) and 7 (activity fully independent) in proportion to the amount of assistance received. A minimum of 18 and a maximum of 126 points can be obtained. A low score means that the level of addiction has increased.

    Time frame: Day 0

  8. Berg Balance Scale

    It is a 14-item scale that evaluates the tasks used in daily life activities.Standing up without support, standing without support, sitting without support, standing up, transfers, standing with feet, standing with legs while standing, reaching out while standing, picking up from the ground, looking back, 360 degree rotation, firm side standing on the stool, one foot standstill and standstill functions are evaluated.Each item is planned between 0-4; 0 is unable to fulfill the task, 4 is to fulfill the task successfully. The total score of the test is between 0-56.0-20 points: wheelchair dependent, 21-40: assisted walking, 41-56: means independent ambulation.

    Time frame: Day 0

  9. Time Up and Go Test

    The test measures the speed during many functional maneuvers such as standing up, walking, turning, and sitting. In the test, the person is asked to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters (10 feet) at a safe and normal pace, turn, walk back and sit on the chair, and the time is recorded in seconds. A short performance period indicates a good balance performance.

    Time frame: Day 0

  10. Functional Reach Test

    Subjects will asked to stand comfortably, to make a fist, and to raise their arm until it was parallel to the yardstick (position 1). The placement of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will recorded. Subjects will then asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (position 2), and the position of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will again recorded. No attempt will make to control the subject's method of reach, but if he will touch the wall or took a step during the maneuver, that trial will consider invalid and repeated.

    Time frame: Day 0

  11. Hand Lateralization Test

    It requires participants to question the laterality of the hand images presented and is commonly used to measure motor imagination ability in humans. It is used to evaluate implicit motor imagination ability. It is also a test that evaluates mental rotation, another dimension of imagination.

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul Medipol University
    Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cho HY, Kim JS, Lee GC. Effects of motor imagery training on balance and gait abilities in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Aug;27(8):675-80. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464702. Epub 2012 Nov 5. PubMed 23129815 ↗
  • Amesz S, Tessari A, Ottoboni G, Marsden J. An observational study of implicit motor imagery using laterality recognition of the hand after stroke. Brain Inj. 2016;30(8):999-1004. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2016.1147600. Epub 2016 Jun 13. PubMed 27294678 ↗
  • Liepert J, Greiner J, Nedelko V, Dettmers C. Reduced upper limb sensation impairs mental chronometry for motor imagery after stroke: clinical and electrophysiological findings. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):470-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425924. Epub 2012 Jan 13. PubMed 22247502 ↗
  • Morioka S, Osumi M, Nishi Y, Ishigaki T, Ishibashi R, Sakauchi T, Takamura Y, Nobusako S. Motor-imagery ability and function of hemiplegic upper limb in stroke patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 Feb 17;6(3):596-604. doi: 10.1002/acn3.739. eCollection 2019 Mar. PubMed 30911582 ↗
  • Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006 Jul;37(7):1941-52. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc. Epub 2006 Jun 1. PubMed 16741183 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We will not plan to share individual participant data.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04832334
Lead sponsor
Medipol University
Responsible party
İkbal Tunç (Physiotherapist, Medipol University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 5, 2021
Start date
Mar 20, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2021
Completion
Sep 20, 2021
Last update
Dec 10, 2021

Study contacts

Fatma Mutluay, Professor
study director · İstanbul Medipol University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion