An interventional study of Immobilization type for mallet injury in Conservatively Treated Mallet Finger Injury, sponsored by Orthopaedic Specialty Group PC, Fairfield. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-21.
Sponsored by Orthopaedic Specialty Group PC, Fairfield · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Comparing outcomes of individuals treated with Kinesiotape and oval 8 versus quick cast for a conservatively managed mallet finger injury. Outcomes include DIP joint extension lag, patient satisfaction and function via the MHQ.
5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.
Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →This is the only study on the registry with Orthopaedic Specialty Group PC, Fairfield as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Immobilization type for mallet injury
Other: Immobilization type for mallet injury
Method to hold the DIP joint in full extension to allow healing of terminal tendon injury/mallet injury
Goniometric measurement of range of motion for distal interphalangeal joint extension lag at the involved digit
Time frame: 12 weeks from injury
Goniometric measurement of range of motion for distal interphalangeal joint extension lag at the involved digit
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Brief Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 weeks from injury
Brief Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Satisfaction on a visual analog scale (0-10)
Time frame: 12 weeks from injury
Satisfaction on a visual analog scale (0-10)
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Goniometric measurement of range of motion deficit for distal interphalangeal joint flexion for involved digit
Time frame: 12 week post injury
Goniometric measurement of range of motion deficit for distal interphalangeal joint flexion for involved digit
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Pain according to a numeric pain rating scale (0-10/10)
Time frame: 12 weeks after injury
Pain according to a numeric pain rating scale (0-10/10)
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.