CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04828213Updated Apr 1, 2021

Tooth-Borne Versus Tooth-Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders: A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation of Soft Tissues

An interventional study of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax) and Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Hybrid hyrax RME appliance in Posterior Crossbite, sponsored by Gökçenur Gökçe. Completed. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-01.

Sponsored by Gökçenur Gökçe · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2016, registered Mar 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The force exerted by the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances provides expansion of the transverse dimension by splitting of the midpalatal suture. This expansion results in three-dimensional (3D) changes in maxillary position which also effects circummaxillary surrounding structures. The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the effects of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on soft tissue with stereophotogrammetry.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: To evaluate the effects of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on soft tissue with stereophotogrammetry. Methods: 32 patients (15 males, 17 females) who met inclusion criteria were divided into two groups. In the first group, tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax) was applied to 16 patients (9 males, 7 females mean age 13.4 ± 1.3 years) and in the second group, tooth-bone-borne RME appliance (Hybrid Hyrax) was applied to 16 patients (6 males, 10 females mean age 13.05 ±1.24 years). A simple electronically generated randomization was performed before trial commencement using the Random Allocation Software program. Allocation concealment involved numbered, sealed, and opaque envelopes prepared before trial commencement. One envelope was sequentially opened for each participant during recruitment. Each envelope contained a card with the name of 1 expander. The initials of the name of the participant, the type of expander, and the date of allocation were identified in the external surface of the envelope. One operator was responsible for the randomization process, allocation concealment, and implementation. The primary outcomes of this study was assessment of changes in soft tissues before RME (T0) and post-retention (T1) period by stereophotogrammetry. Independent and dependent sample t tests were used to compare intra- and inter-group differences at P\<0.05 significance level.

02

Conditions studied

  • Posterior Crossbite

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stereophotogrammetry
  • Tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion
  • skeletal anchorage
  • mini-screws
03

In context

Malocclusion

457 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 36 across 372 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Gökçenur Gökçe as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. No previous tonsillar, nasal or adenoid surgery and orthodontic treatment,
  2. Bilateral crossbite and need for RME,
  3. Maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth fully erupted,
  4. Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. the presence of adenotonsillectomy due to tonsillar hypertrophy or adenoidal hypertrophy
  2. Having nasal/nasopharyngeal /oropharyngeal pathologies, craniofacial syndromes, systemic disease, poor oral hygiene,
  3. History of previous orthodontic treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax)

    In the Tooth-borne RME expander group, bands were placed to the maxillary right and left upper 1st premolar and 1st molar teeth. The impression of the upper jaw was obtained with the bands in mouth by using alginate impression material. In the laboratory process, a hyrax (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany; Forestadent USA, St Louis, Missouri, USA) expansion appliance with an expansion screw in the middle was prepared on the models by the same technician under standard conditions. RME activation was performed twice a day for the first week and then once per day. When it was decided that the expansion was sufficient (until the palatal tubercles of the upper molars came into contact with the buccal tubercles of the lower molars), the screw was fixed with the 0.012-inch ligature wire (American Orthodontics) and the appliance was kept in the mouth without being activated for 3 months.

    Device: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax) · Device: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Hybrid hyrax RME appliance

  • Experimental
    Hybrid hyrax RME appliance

    Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment. In the Hybrid hyrax RME appliance group, mini-screws of 2 mm diameter and 9 mm length (Benefit mini-implants; PSM Medical Solutions; Tuttlingen, Germany) were placed 3 mm posterior and 1 to 5 mm paramedian to the incisive foramina. RME activation was performed twice a day for the first week and then once per day. When it was decided that the expansion was sufficient (until the palatal tubercles of the upper molars came into contact with the buccal tubercles of the lower molars), the screw was fixed with the 0.012-inch ligature wire (American Orthodontics) and the appliance was kept in the mouth without being activated for 3 months.

    Device: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax) · Device: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Hybrid hyrax RME appliance

Interventions

  • DeviceRapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax)

    The patients were treated with a expansion appliance containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and were used to correct the posterior crossbite. RME activation was performed twice a day for the first week and then once per day. When it was decided that the expansion was sufficient (until the palatal tubercles of the upper molars came into contact with the buccal tubercles of the lower molars), the screw was fixed with the 0.012-inch ligature wire (American Orthodontics) and the appliance was kept in the mouth without being activated for 3 months.

  • DeviceRapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Hybrid hyrax RME appliance

    The patients were treated with a Hybrid hyrax RME appliance containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and mini-screws. RME activation was performed twice a day for the first week and then once per day. When it was decided that the expansion was sufficient (until the palatal tubercles of the upper molars came into contact with the buccal tubercles of the lower molars), the screw was fixed with the 0.012-inch ligature wire (American Orthodontics) and the appliance was kept in the mouth without being activated for 3 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Increasing soft tissue facial measurement-1

    Increasing anterior face height

    Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months retention period

  2. Increasing soft tissue facial measurement-2

    Increasing upper lip length

    Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months retention period

  3. Increasing soft tissue facial measurement-3

    Increasing lower face height

    Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months retention period

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Akan B, Gokce G, Sahan AO, Veli I. Tooth-borne versus tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders according to a stereophotogrammetric evaluation of facial soft tissues: A randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Aug;24(3):438-448. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12509. Epub 2021 Jun 21. PubMed 34105880 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04828213
Lead sponsor
Gökçenur Gökçe
Responsible party
Gökçenur Gökçe (Assistant professor, Izmir Katip Celebi University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2021
Start date
May 20, 2016
Primary completion
Feb 14, 2017
Completion
Jul 17, 2017
Last update
Apr 1, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion