CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04825405Updated Apr 1, 2021

The Use of the Tip Stim Glove Device to Achieve Coordinated Movement of the Human Hand

An interventional study of hand motor coordination in a sitting position after use TipStim Glove in Stroke, Ischemic, sponsored by Anna Olczak. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 42 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-01.

Sponsored by Anna Olczak · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2019, registered Mar 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
42 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study was to evaluate the use of the Tip Stim device to achieve coordinated movement and grip force in stroke patients under conditions of active and passive stabilization of the trunk.

Read the detailed description

To test the effectiveness of the Tip Stim device, each patient received (alternating) both the experimental and control treatments in a specific sequence to assess the coordination of human hand movement and the grip strength. The first therapy with the use of Tip Stim parameters (Ratio current time to pause time: 2 sec :5 sec; Ramp (rise time impulse): 0,3 sec; Frequency: 20 Hz; Pulse width: 300 µs). Another session (putting on the glove without setting any parameters) took place after a week (time to mute the effects of the intervention). The duration of each therapy session is 60 minutes. After the first therapeutic session and after a week, the parameters of movement coordination and hand grip were examined. The study of motor coordination and grip strength was performed in two different starting positions: sitting (no stabilization) (fig. 1) and lying (with stabilization) (fig. 2), and with a different position of the examined upper limb. During the first examination, the subject sat on a treatment table, feet resting on the floor. Upper limb examined in adduction, with bent elbow joint in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. In the supine examination, the upper limb was stabilized against the subject's body (adduction in the shoulder joint, flexion in the elbow joint in an intermediate position). In each of the starting positions, first after putting on the glove, the range of passive motion in the radial-wrist joint (flexion and extension) and fingers (global flexion and extension) was measured, then the active movement was measured, in the sequence as above. Eventually, they were asked to make movements as quickly and as fully as possible. Measurement of the grip force with a dynamometer was performed in both analyzed starting positions after testing the ranges of motion and speed/frequency.

The Hand Tutor device and the EH 101 electronic hand dynamometer measuring the strength of the handgrip (measurement error 0.5 kg / 1 lb) were used to test the parameters of motor coordination and grip strength. The Hand Tutor is a device with a rehabilitation program and the ability to measure the range of passive and active movement, deficits of movement (error of measurement, 5 - 10 mm) as well as the speed/frequency of movement (error of measurement, 0,5 cycle/sec.).

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Ischemic

Keywords

  • Tip Stim Glove device
  • motor coordination
  • grip strength
  • passive stabilization
  • stroke
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Anna Olczak is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
42 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:: 1) patients with hemiparesis after 5 to 7 weeks after stroke; 2) no severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding what can impede proper measurement performance; 3) at least 40 years of age; 4) maximum 89 years of age.

-

Exclusion Criteria:1) stroke up to two weeks after the episode, 2) acute polyneuropathy and damage to peripheral nerves, 3) lack of trunk stability, 4) no wrist and hand movement, 5) hypersensitivity to electrical stimulation, 6) metal implants in the hand, cardiac dysfunction, epilepsy, 7) decorations on the fingers, 8) high or very low blood pressure, 9) dizziness , malaise of the respondents.

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    The use of the active Tip Stim device to achieve coordinated of the hand.

    Influence of the tested position and the use of the active TipStim Glove device on the improvement of motor coordination and grip force in patients after a stroke.

    Procedure: hand motor coordination in a sitting position after use TipStim Glove

  • Placebo comparator
    The use of the passive Tip Stim device to achieve coordinated of the hand.

    Influence of the tested position and the use of the passive TipStim Glove device on the improvement of motor coordination and grip force in patients after a stroke.

    Procedure: hand motor coordination in a sitting position after use TipStim Glove

Interventions

  • Procedurehand motor coordination in a sitting position after use TipStim Glove

    The next therapy with the use of Tip Stim took place after a week. The duration of each therapy session was 60 minutes. After the first therapy session and after a week, the parameters of movement coordination and handgrip were examined. The study of motor coordination and grip strength was performed in two different starting positions: sitting (no stabilization) and lying (with stabilization), and with a different position of the examined upper limb. The upper limb was examined in adduction, with the bent elbow joint in the intermediate position of the forearm. In each of the starting positions, first, the range of passive motion in the wrist joint (flexion and extension) and fingers (global flexion and extension) was measured, then the active movement was measured, in the sequence as above. Patients were asked to make movements as quickly and as fully as possible. Measurement of the grip force was performed after testing the ranges of motion and speed/frequency.

    Also known as: hand motor coordination in a supine position after use TipStim Glove

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of passive movement of the wrist, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the range of passive movement (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  2. Range of active movement of the wrist, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the range of active movement (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  3. Wrist extension deficit, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the wrist extension deficit, (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  4. Wrist flexion deficit, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the wrist flexion deficit, (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  5. Maximum range of wrist movement

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the maximum range of movement (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  6. Frequncy of wrist movement (flexion to extension), cycle#sec

    The Hand Tutor allows measurement of the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles per sec.)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  7. Assessment of the grip strength

    A manual electronic dynamometer (EH 101) was used for grip strength measurement (kg)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  8. Range of passive movement of the fingers, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the range of fingers passive movement (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  9. Range of active movement of the fingers, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the range of fingers active movement (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  10. Fingers extension deficit, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the fingers extension deficit, (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  11. Fingers flexion deficit, mm

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the fingers flexion deficit, (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  12. Maximum range of fingers movement

    The Hand Tutor allows measuremnt of the maximum range of movement (in mm)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  13. Frequncy of fingers movement (flexion to extension), cycle#sec

    The Hand Tutor allows measurement of the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles per sec.)

    Time frame: up to 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Anna Olczak
    Warsaw, Masovian District 04-141, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04825405
Lead sponsor
Anna Olczak
Responsible party
Anna Olczak (PhD; Senior Specjalit of the Rehabilitation Clinc, Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2021
Start date
Jul 10, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 14, 2020
Completion
Feb 14, 2020
Last update
Apr 1, 2021

Study contacts

Anna Olczak, PhD
principal investigator · Military Institute of Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion