An observational study in PreDiabetes and Prediabetic State, sponsored by University of Mississippi Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-29.
Sponsored by University of Mississippi Medical Center · Observational
The National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is an evidence-based, 12-month lifestyle change program to prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (herein referred to as 'diabetes') among adults with prediabetes. The Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center (UMMC), in partnership with the American Medical Association, is collaborating to develop and implement the DPP as a clinical service for UMMC patients beginning in September 2020. We aim to recruit 245 patients per year over 3 years. Because this is the first attempt to develop and implement the DPP as a clinical service at the UMMC, we are proposing to conduct a comprehensive process, outcome, impact and return on investment evaluation. An effectiveness-implementation hybrid research design will be used to (1) evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy and the effectiveness and impact of the DPP delivered using telehealth by UMMC's Department of Preventive Medicine; (2) conduct an analysis on medical expenditures among those who participate in a DPP to measure net savings and return on investment (ROI) relative to non-participants; (3) conduct a longitudinal cohort analysis to assess incidence of diabetes and changes in body composition, biomarkers, and psycho-social behavioral constructs among those who participate in a DPP relative to those who do not.
The findings from this comprehensive research evaluation will be used to (1) improve clinical operations and implementation; (2) demonstrate the cost benefit of the DPP as a clinical service for patients with diabetes risk; and (3) provide empirical support for delivering the DPP via different modalities including telehealth to reduce risk and improve health outcomes among patients.
The purpose of this research is to: (1) Evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy for the uptake of a remote DPP by UMMC's Department of Preventive Medicine. (2) Conduct an analysis on medical expenditures among those who participate in a DPP to measure net savings and ROI relative to non-participants. (3) Conduct a longitudinal cohort analysis to assess incidence of diabetes, body composition, biomarkers, and psycho-social behavioral constructs among those who participate in a DPP relative to those who do not. Study methods are described below according to each of three specific aims.
Aim 1: Conduct a concurrent implementation and effectiveness evaluation of the DPP in a clinical care setting for patients with prediabetes (n=245). An effectiveness-implementation hybrid type III research design will be used to conduct a non-randomized trial with 245 of patients with prediabetes over a three year recruitment period, while employing an iterative process evaluation to explore the complex processes, dynamic context and organizational influences on implementation. The RE-AIM framework will guide the implementation and effectiveness evaluation including measures of Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. Multiple data sources and data types will be used to assess barriers and facilitators that affect the RE-AIM domains, as well as fidelity, costs, patient satisfaction and physician burnout.
Aim 2: Utilize claims and encounters data to measure medical expenditures for patients with prediabetes, and determine spending differentials among DPP participants compared with non-DPP participants. Track trends in per capita medical expenditures for among a panel of case (DPP participant) and control (Non-DPP participant) subjects. To compare variations in spending, the differences in the arithmetic means, compound annual growth rates, and propensity score matching models will be implemented to compare case and control subjects. The study may also look at those with prediabetes that are later diagnosed with diabetes and individuals with prediabetes who are not later diagnosed with the condition. These estimates of spending differentials and evidence of DPP participation and engagement rates will help to further enhance the algorithm to estimate the potential cost savings and ROI if diabetes is prevented or delayed in the at-risk population who participate in the DPP.
Aim 3: Assess the longitudinal effect of the DPP on participant changes in cardiovascular disease risk including anthropometric and clinical biomarker and psychosocial health outcomes (N=245). A prospective, repeated measures, experimental cohort design will be used to determine the long-term impact of the DPP on diabetes incidence and cardiovascular disease risk among DPP patient participants.
999 studies on the registry are indexed under Prediabetic State; 238 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 216 across 128 observational studies indexed under Prediabetic State.
Browse Prediabetic State studies →University of Mississippi Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 125 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (57%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Mississippi consistently has among the highest rates of diabetes (14.3%) and prediabetes (36.5%) nationally and is the only state where every county (82 counties) are represented in the Diabetes Belt, a geographic region of the U.S. where the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes is highest. Mississippi has the fourth largest rural population (51.2%) and the highest state percent Black (37.8%) population in the U.S., and has persistently high rates of poverty (20.8%).
OR any of the following combinations:
Exclusion Criteria:
UMMC Patients with prediabetes or risk for diabetes based on risk parameters referred to and enrolled in the DPP.
Behavioral: Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)
Control matched UMMC patients with prediabetes or risk for diabetes based on risk parameters not enrolled in the DPP.
Individuals with prediabetes can mitigate the risks and costs of diabetes by taking preventative action, such as participation in a National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). The DPP began as a multisite randomized controlled trial demonstrating the effectiveness and cost-benefit of a 12-month intensive lifestyle intervention over pharmaceutical treatment for preventing or delaying diabetes among prediabetic participants. In 2010, Congress authorized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to lead the dissemination of the DPP as a targeted approach (high risk populations) and population-based strategy to reduce the incidence of diabetes and diabetes-related healthcare costs. The goal is to achieve modest weight loss (7%) by developing and implementing behavior change skills resulting in lifestyle modifications such as physical activity (150 minutes per week) and dietary and nutritional practices.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis
Diabetes diagnosis extracted via electronic health record; all codes with prefix of 250 and 249
Time frame: Change diabetes diagnosis from baseline to 6-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis
Diabetes diagnosis extracted via electronic health record; all codes with prefix of 250 and 249
Time frame: Change diabetes diagnosis from baseline to 12-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis
Diabetes diagnosis extracted via electronic health record; all codes with prefix of 250 and 249
Time frame: Change diabetes diagnosis from baseline to 18-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis
Diabetes diagnosis extracted via electronic health record; all codes with prefix of 250 and 249
Time frame: Change diabetes diagnosis from baseline to 24-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis
Diabetes diagnosis extracted via electronic health record; all codes with prefix of 250 and 249
Time frame: Change diabetes diagnosis from baseline to 30-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis
Diabetes diagnosis extracted via electronic health record; all codes with prefix of 250 and 249
Time frame: Change diabetes diagnosis from baseline to 36-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Hemoglobin A1c
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Hemoglobin A1c
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 12-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Hemoglobin A1c
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 18-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Hemoglobin A1c
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 24-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Hemoglobin A1c
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 30-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Hemoglobin A1c
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 36-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Fasting plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 6-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Fasting plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 12-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Fasting plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 18-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Fasting plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 24-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Fasting plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 30-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Fasting plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 36-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
2-hour plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in 2-hour plasma glucose from baseline to 6-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
2-hour plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in 2-hour plasma glucose from baseline to 12-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
2-hour plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in 2-hour plasma glucose from baseline to 18-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
2-hour plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in 2-hour plasma glucose from baseline to 24-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
2-hour plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in 2-hour plasma glucose from baseline to 30-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
2-hour plasma glucose
Lab values extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Change in 2-hour plasma glucose from baseline to 36-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical encounters
Extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Number of medical encounters between baseline and 6-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical encounters
Extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Number of medical encounters between baseline and 12-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical encounters
Extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Number of medical encounters between baseline and 18-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical encounters
Extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Number of medical encounters between baseline and 24-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical encounters
Extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Number of medical encounters between baseline and 30-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical encounters
Extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Number of medical encounters between baseline and 36-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical expenditures
Total dollar amount billed per encounter extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Medical expenditures from baseline to 6-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical expenditures
Total dollar amount billed per encounter extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Medical expenditures from baseline to 12-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical expenditures
Total dollar amount billed per encounter extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Medical expenditures from baseline to 18-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical expenditures
Total dollar amount billed per encounter extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Medical expenditures from baseline to 24-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical expenditures
Total dollar amount billed per encounter extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Medical expenditures from baseline to 30-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Medical expenditures
Total dollar amount billed per encounter extracted from electronic health record
Time frame: Medical expenditures from baseline to 36-months in DPP compared with non-DPP patients
Body weight
Total body weight measured using Seca mBCA 554
Time frame: Change in body weight from baseline to 6-months
Body weight
Total body weight measured using Seca mBCA 554
Time frame: Change in body weight from baseline to 12-months
Body weight
Total body weight measured using Seca mBCA 554
Time frame: Change in body weight from baseline to 24-months
Body weight
Total body weight measured using Seca mBCA 554
Time frame: Change in body weight from baseline to 36-months
Fat mass
Total body fat mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in fat mass from baseline to 6-months
Fat mass
Total body fat mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in fat mass from baseline to 12-months
Fat mass
Total body fat mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in fat mass from baseline to 24-months
Fat mass
Total body fat mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in fat mass from baseline to 36-months
Visceral fat
Visceral fat measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in visceral fat from baseline to 6-months
Visceral fat
Visceral fat measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in visceral fat from baseline to 12-months
Visceral fat
Visceral fat measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in visceral fat from baseline to 24-months
Visceral fat
Visceral fat measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in visceral fat from baseline to 36-months
Skeletal muscle mass
Total body skeletal muscle mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in skeletal muscle mass from baseline to 6-months
Skeletal muscle mass
Total body skeletal muscle mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in skeletal muscle mass from baseline to 12-months
Skeletal muscle mass
Total body skeletal muscle mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in skeletal muscle mass from baseline to 24-months
Skeletal muscle mass
Total body skeletal muscle mass measured using Seca mBCA 554; bioimpedance analysis
Time frame: Change in skeletal muscle mass from baseline to 36-months
Waist circumference
Measures using Seca 203 circumference measuring tape
Time frame: Change in waist circumference from baseline to 6-months
Waist circumference
Measures using Seca 203 circumference measuring tape
Time frame: Change in waist circumference from baseline to 12-months
Waist circumference
Measures using Seca 203 circumference measuring tape
Time frame: Change in waist circumference from baseline to 24-months
Waist circumference
Measures using Seca 203 circumference measuring tape
Time frame: Change in waist circumference from baseline to 36-months
Systolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6-months
Systolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12-months
Systolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to 24-months
Systolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to 36-months
Diastolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 6-months
Diastolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12-months
Diastolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 24-months
Diastolic blood pressure
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit following the American Heart Association guidelines for adults.
Time frame: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 36-months
Resting heart rate
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit.
Time frame: Change in resting heart rate from baseline to 6-months
Resting heart rate
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit.
Time frame: Change in resting heart rate from baseline to 12-months
Resting heart rate
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit.
Time frame: Change in resting heart rate from baseline to 24-months
Resting heart rate
Welch Allyn blood pressure unit.
Time frame: Change in resting heart rate from baseline to 36-months
Total cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in total cholesterol from baseline to 6-months
Total cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in total cholesterol from baseline to 12-months
Total cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in total cholesterol from baseline to 24-months
Total cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in total cholesterol from baseline to 36-months
HDL cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline to 6-months
HDL cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline to 12-months
HDL cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline to 24-months
HDL cholesterol
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline to 36-months
Triglycerides
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in triglycerides from baseline to 6-months
Triglycerides
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in triglycerides from baseline to 12-months
Triglycerides
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in triglycerides from baseline to 24-months
Triglycerides
PTS Diagnostics CardioChek Plus analyzer; point of care finger stick to obtain 40 μL blood
Time frame: Change in triglycerides from baseline to 36-months
Hemoglobin A1c (point of care)
A1CNOW+ System for reliable point-of-care HbA1c measurement; non-fasting 5 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-months
Hemoglobin A1c (point of care)
A1CNOW+ System for reliable point-of-care HbA1c measurement; non-fasting 5 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 12-months
Hemoglobin A1c (point of care)
A1CNOW+ System for reliable point-of-care HbA1c measurement; non-fasting 5 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 24-months
Hemoglobin A1c (point of care)
A1CNOW+ System for reliable point-of-care HbA1c measurement; non-fasting 5 μL blood
Time frame: Change in HbA1c from baseline to 36-months
Self-efficacy for weight loss and maintenance
Weight self-efficacy lifestyle questionnaire; 20 items using a 10-point Likert scale; higher mean score indicates higher self-efficacy; Clark et al., 1991
Time frame: Change in self-efficacy from baseline to 6-months
Self-efficacy for weight loss and maintenance
Weight self-efficacy lifestyle questionnaire; 20 items using a 10-point Likert scale; higher mean score indicates higher self-efficacy; Clark et al., 1991
Time frame: Change in self-efficacy from baseline to 12-months
Self-efficacy for weight loss and maintenance
Weight self-efficacy lifestyle questionnaire; 20 items using a 10-point Likert scale; higher mean score indicates higher self-efficacy; Clark et al., 1991
Time frame: Change in self-efficacy from baseline to 24-months
Self-efficacy for weight loss and maintenance
Weight self-efficacy lifestyle questionnaire; 20 items using a 10-point Likert scale; higher mean score indicates higher self-efficacy; Clark et al., 1991
Time frame: Change in self-efficacy from baseline to 36-months
Readiness to change, stage of change
Stages of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (S-weight); 1-item with 5 distinct and mutually exclusive responses to measure stage of change; Andres et al., 2009
Time frame: Change in stage of change from baseline to 6-months
Readiness to change, stage of change
Stages of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (S-weight); 1-item with 5 distinct and mutually exclusive responses to measure stage of change; Andres et al., 2009
Time frame: Change in stage of change from baseline to 12-months
Readiness to change, stage of change
Stages of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (S-weight); 1-item with 5 distinct and mutually exclusive responses to measure stage of change; Andres et al., 2009
Time frame: Change in stage of change from baseline to 24-months
Readiness to change, stage of change
Stages of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (S-weight); 1-item with 5 distinct and mutually exclusive responses to measure stage of change; Andres et al., 2009
Time frame: Change in stage of change from baseline to 36-months
Readiness to change, processes of change
Processes of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (P-weight); 34 items; 5-point Likert scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree where higher mean score indicates higher use of respective process; four processes include emotional re-evaluation, weight consequences evaluation, supporting relationships, and weight management actions across 4 processes of change; Andres et al., 2011
Time frame: Change in processes of change from baseline to 6-months
Readiness to change, processes of change
Processes of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (P-weight); 34 items; 5-point Likert scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree where higher mean score indicates higher use of respective process; four processes include emotional re-evaluation, weight consequences evaluation, supporting relationships, and weight management actions across 4 processes of change; Andres et al., 2011
Time frame: Change in processes of change from baseline to 12-months
Readiness to change, processes of change
Processes of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (P-weight); 34 items; 5-point Likert scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree where higher mean score indicates higher use of respective process; four processes include emotional re-evaluation, weight consequences evaluation, supporting relationships, and weight management actions across 4 processes of change; Andres et al., 2011
Time frame: Change in processes of change from baseline to 24-months
Readiness to change, processes of change
Processes of Change in Overweight and Obese People questionnaire (P-weight); 34 items; 5-point Likert scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree where higher mean score indicates higher use of respective process; four processes include emotional re-evaluation, weight consequences evaluation, supporting relationships, and weight management actions across 4 processes of change; Andres et al., 2011
Time frame: Change in processes of change from baseline to 36-months
Decisional balance
Decisional balance inventory; 20 items using 5-point Likert scale to identify cognitive and emotional pros and cons to making intentional changes for weight loss and maintenance (Not Important At All to Extremely Important); higher mean scores for subscales (Pros; Pro-Con) would indicate higher intention; O'Connell and Velicer, 1988
Time frame: Change in decisional balance from baseline to 6-months
Decisional balance
Decisional balance inventory; 20 items using 5-point Likert scale to identify cognitive and emotional pros and cons to making intentional changes for weight loss and maintenance (Not Important At All to Extremely Important); higher mean scores for subscales (Pros; Pro-Con) would indicate higher intention; O'Connell and Velicer, 1988
Time frame: Change in decisional balance from baseline to 12-months
Decisional balance
Decisional balance inventory; 20 items using 5-point Likert scale to identify cognitive and emotional pros and cons to making intentional changes for weight loss and maintenance (Not Important At All to Extremely Important); higher mean scores for subscales (Pros; Pro-Con) would indicate higher intention; O'Connell and Velicer, 1988
Time frame: Change in decisional balance from baseline to 24-months
Decisional balance
Decisional balance inventory; 20 items using 5-point Likert scale to identify cognitive and emotional pros and cons to making intentional changes for weight loss and maintenance (Not Important At All to Extremely Important); higher mean scores for subscales (Pros; Pro-Con) would indicate higher intention; O'Connell and Velicer, 1988
Time frame: Change in decisional balance from baseline to 36-months
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and healthy eating
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and diet; 10 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Very Uncertain to Very Certain or Not True At All to Exactly True; higher mean score (20 to 80) indicated greater self-efficacy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in barrier self-efficacy from baseline to 6-months
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and healthy eating
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and diet; 10 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Very Uncertain to Very Certain or Not True At All to Exactly True; higher mean score (20 to 80) indicated greater self-efficacy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in barrier self-efficacy from baseline to 12-months
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and healthy eating
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and diet; 10 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Very Uncertain to Very Certain or Not True At All to Exactly True; higher mean score (20 to 80) indicated greater self-efficacy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in barrier self-efficacy from baseline to 24-months
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and healthy eating
Self-efficacy for overcoming barriers to physical activity and diet; 10 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Very Uncertain to Very Certain or Not True At All to Exactly True; higher mean score (20 to 80) indicated greater self-efficacy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in barrier self-efficacy from baseline to 36-months
Self-regulation of eating behaviors
Self-regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire; 5 items using a 5-point Likert scale; mean score \<2.8, 2.8 - 3.6, \>3.6 correspond to low, medium and high self-regulation, respectively; Kliemann et al., 2016
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of eating behaviors from baseline to 6-months
Self-regulation of eating behaviors
Self-regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire; 5 items using a 5-point Likert scale; mean score \<2.8, 2.8 - 3.6, \>3.6 correspond to low, medium and high self-regulation, respectively; Kliemann et al., 2016
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of eating behaviors from baseline to 12-months
Self-regulation of eating behaviors
Self-regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire; 5 items using a 5-point Likert scale; mean score \<2.8, 2.8 - 3.6, \>3.6 correspond to low, medium and high self-regulation, respectively; Kliemann et al., 2016
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of eating behaviors from baseline to 24-months
Self-regulation of eating behaviors
Self-regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire; 5 items using a 5-point Likert scale; mean score \<2.8, 2.8 - 3.6, \>3.6 correspond to low, medium and high self-regulation, respectively; Kliemann et al., 2016
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of eating behaviors from baseline to 36-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - goals
Exercise goal-setting scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity goals from baseline to 6-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - goals
Exercise goal-setting scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity goals from baseline to 12-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - goals
Exercise goal-setting scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity goals from baseline to 24-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - goals
Exercise goal-setting scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Exercise goal-setting scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity goals from baseline to 36-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - planning
Exercise planning and scheduling scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity planning from baseline to 6-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - planning
Exercise planning and scheduling scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity planning from baseline to 12-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - planning
Exercise planning and scheduling scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity planning from baseline to 24-months
Self-regulation of physical activity - planning
Exercise planning and scheduling scale; 10 items using 5-point Likert scale from Does Not Describe Me (0) to Describes Me Completely (4); higher mean score reflects greater self-regulation Rovniak et al., 2002
Time frame: Change in self-regulation of physical activity planning from baseline to 36-months
Social support from friends - eating
Friend social support for healthy eating scale; 10 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 6-months
Social support from friends - eating
Friend social support for healthy eating scale; 10 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 12-months
Social support from friends - eating
Friend social support for healthy eating scale; 10 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 24-months
Social support from friends - eating
Friend social support for healthy eating scale; 10 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 36-months
Social support from family - eating
Family social support for healthy eating scale; 13 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 6-months
Social support from family - eating
Family social support for healthy eating scale; 13 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 12-months
Social support from family - eating
Family social support for healthy eating scale; 13 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 24-months
Social support from family - eating
Family social support for healthy eating scale; 13 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 36-months
Social support from friend - physical activity
Friend social support for physical activity scale; 9-items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 6-months
Social support from friend - physical activity
Friend social support for physical activity scale; 9-items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 12-months
Social support from friend - physical activity
Friend social support for physical activity scale; 9-items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 24-months
Social support from friend - physical activity
Friend social support for physical activity scale; 9-items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 36-months
Social support from family - physical activity
Family social support for physical activity scale; 15 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 6-months
Social support from family - physical activity
Family social support for physical activity scale; 15 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 12-months
Social support from family - physical activity
Family social support for physical activity scale; 15 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 24-months
Social support from family - physical activity
Family social support for physical activity scale; 15 items using a 5-point Likert scale from None of the Time (1) to All of the Time (5) where a higher mean score indicated greater social support; Sallis et al., 1987
Time frame: Change in social support from baseline to 36-months
Outcome expectancies
Outcome expectancies of behavior change; 25 items using 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicating greater outcome expectancy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in outcome expectancies from baseline to 6-months
Outcome expectancies
Outcome expectancies of behavior change; 25 items using 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicating greater outcome expectancy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in outcome expectancies from baseline to 12-months
Outcome expectancies
Outcome expectancies of behavior change; 25 items using 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicating greater outcome expectancy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in outcome expectancies from baseline to 24-months
Outcome expectancies
Outcome expectancies of behavior change; 25 items using 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicating greater outcome expectancy; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in outcome expectancies from baseline to 36-months
Coping self-efficacy
Coping self-efficacy scale; 14 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicates greater self-efficacy for coping; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in coping self-efficacy from baseline to 6-months
Coping self-efficacy
Coping self-efficacy scale; 14 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicates greater self-efficacy for coping; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in coping self-efficacy from baseline to 12-months
Coping self-efficacy
Coping self-efficacy scale; 14 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicates greater self-efficacy for coping; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in coping self-efficacy from baseline to 24-months
Coping self-efficacy
Coping self-efficacy scale; 14 items using a 4-point Likert scale from Not True At All (1) to Exactly True (4); higher mean score indicates greater self-efficacy for coping; Huttunen-Lenz et al., 2018
Time frame: Change in coping self-efficacy from baseline to 36-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 3-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 6-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 9-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 12-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 15-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 21-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 24-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 27-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 30-months
Eligible DPP patients (reach)
Proportion of patients eligible for DPP relative to total number of patients in ambulatory setting; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 33-months
Patients eligible for DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting eligible for DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 36-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 3-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 6-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 9-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 12-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 15-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 21-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 24-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 27-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 30-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 33-months
Patients referred to DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting referred to DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 36-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 3-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 6-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 9-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 12-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 15-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 21-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 24-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 27-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 30-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 33-months
Patients enrolled in DPP (reach)
Total number of patients in the ambulatory setting enrolled in DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 36-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 3-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 6-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 9-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 12-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 15-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 21-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 24-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 27-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 30-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 33-months
Referring clinical sites (adoption)
Total number of clinical sites referring patients to the DPP, electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 36-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 3-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 6-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 9-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 12-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 15-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 21-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 24-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 27-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 30-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 33-months
Referring providers (adoption)
Total number of providers referring patients to the DPP; electronic health record
Time frame: Baseline to 36-months
Implementation
Qualitative assessment of implementation processes
Time frame: Continuous processual evaluation
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Mississippi Medical Center