ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04818034Updated Oct 16, 2025Results posted

The Effect of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter (SGLT) 2 Inhibitors on Cystine Stone Formation: A Preliminary Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of Dapagliflozin in Cystinuria, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-16.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cystinuria is an inherited autosomal recessive disorder of the kidney that is the result of an inability to reabsorb cystine from the urine. Supersaturation of cystine in the urine produces crystals that precipitate and form stones in the kidney, which can be a cause of obstruction, infection, and chronic kidney disease. Cystine stones constitute a major health challenge for affected individuals with cystinuria because of the frequent recurrence of painful symptoms and the current absence of effective, patient-accepting treatment.

A mainstay of therapy is breaking or preventing the cystine bond on the molecular level such that cystine (which is formed from the joining of two cysteine amino acids and their corresponding sulfur atoms) cannot precipitate in the urine. It is hypothesized that a glucose molecule may be able to do this if introduced into the urine. SGLT-2 inhibitors are a class of drug that are FDA approved to treat diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure by inhibiting an enzyme in the kidney that allows for reabsorption of glucose from the urine. This effectively increases the concentration of glucose in the urine. Our hypothesis suggests that administration of this drug to patients with cystine will introduce sufficient glucose into the urine to prevent the formation of cystine stones. To date, there has been no published data on the effectiveness of this therapy for this indication, although the dosage and administration would be identical to that already approved by the FDA for the treatment of DM and heart failure.

Read the detailed description

This is a single center, proof of concept prospective cohort trial designed to assess the effect of daily oral administration of dapagliflozin on cystine formation in freshly voided urine. Five subjects are planned, each with previously diagnosed cystinuria and without current treatment except with potassium citrate medication.

Total duration of subject participation with be up to four weeks. Total duration of the study is expected to be 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystinuria

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cystinuria

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystinuria; 5 are open to participants now.

Browse Cystinuria studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • males and females age 18 or older
  • documented cystinuria on prior 24-hour urine collection and/or stone analysis
  • history of previous cystine kidney stones
  • able and willing to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type I or type II)
  • current SGLT-2 inhibitor administration at the time of screening
  • SGLT-2 inhibitor administration within the last year prior to screening
  • vulnerable populations including incarceration status
  • anticipation of pregnancy during the study duration
  • unable to give
  • non-English primary language
  • pregnancy, lactation, or child- bearing age without devices
  • serious illness likely to cause death within the next 5 years.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 mg Dapagliflozin taken orally once daily for 4 weeks

    10 mg of the study drug Dapagliflozin taken orally once daily for 4 weeks

    Drug: Dapagliflozin

Interventions

  • Dapagliflozin is to lower blood sugar levels in adults with type 2 diabetes.

    Also known as: FARXIGA

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 24hr Urine Measurements of the Effect of SGLT-2 Inhibitor Therapy on Cystine Production in Urine in Patients With Cystinuria

    The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed by comparing previous 24hr urine cystine concentration data collected prior to study participation and 24hr urine concentration data collected after being on the study drug, specifically examining the content of cystine in the urine but not exclusively.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Results

Posted Oct 8, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Our study has several important limitations. First, this was a retrospective study with a limited follow up duration on SGLT2 inhibitors. Second, treating the stone event rate as its own control may introduce healthcare utilization bias as interfacing with the medical system could have led to improved dietary habits which had a major impact on stone event rates. Third, patients with cystinuria are known to develop symptomatic calculi in clusters for unknown reasons. The sample size is small.

Participant flow

The study team will identify the patients being treated for cystinuria within the study team's clinic. The study team will inform these patients of the study and provide them with the study details to allow further discussion and to answer any questions the patients might have.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy Drug
Started10
Completed10
Not completed0

Outcome measures

Primary24hr Urine Measurements of the Effect of SGLT-2 Inhibitor Therapy on Cystine Production in Urine in Patients With Cystinuria

The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed by comparing previous 24hr urine cystine concentration data collected prior to study participation and 24hr urine concentration data collected after being on the study drug, specifically examining the content of cystine in the urine but not exclusively.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · 24hr urine cystine concentration (mg)
24hr Urine Measurements of the Effect of SGLT-2 Inhibitor Therapy on Cystine Production in Urine in Patients With Cystinuria
24hr urine cystine concentration (mg)Study Drug
24hr Urine Measurements of the Effect of SGLT-2 Inhibitor Therapy on Cystine Production in Urine in Patients With Cystinuria999.3 ± 1.1
Statistical analysis
  • Study Drug · paired t-test · p = 0.965 · Paired t-test: 0.965

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until the end of follow-up, 4 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study Drug0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Study Drug
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years10
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Drug
Female7
Male3
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Drug
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White9
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Drug
Hispanic or Latino3
Not Hispanic or Latino7
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 3 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2025, 3 years 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 17, 2021
First posted
Mar 26, 2021
StartActual
Aug 30, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 13, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 28, 2022
Results first posted
Oct 8, 2025
Last update
Oct 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04818034
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2021
Start date
Aug 30, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 13, 2021
Completion
Apr 28, 2022
Results posted
Oct 8, 2025
Last update
Oct 16, 2025

Study contacts

Marshall Stoller
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dapagliflozin

Start the discussion