ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04813289Updated Mar 24, 2021

Review of Anaesthetic Practice in Orthognathic Surgery

An observational study in Maxillofacial Abnormalities, Blood Pressure and Anesthesia, sponsored by Singapore General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Singapore. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-24.

Sponsored by Singapore General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
269
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Orthognathic surgeries for maxillofacial deformities are commonly performed globally. However, they are associated with significant blood loss which can affect the surgical field and result in blood transfusion and its risks. We aim to review the different hypotensive anaesthetic practices for orthognathic surgeries, and their effects on intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Maxillofacial Abnormalities
  • Blood Pressure
  • Anesthesia
03

In context

Maxillofacial Abnormalities

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Maxillofacial Abnormalities; 2 are open to participants now.

Browse Maxillofacial Abnormalities studies →

Lead sponsor

Singapore General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 270 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients who were scheduled for orthognathic surgeries from January 2014 to March 2017 were included.Patients were excluded from the study if surgery was not done or there were missing anaesthetic records.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients who were scheduled for orthognathic surgeries from January 2014 to March 2017

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • surgery was not done
  • there were missing anaesthetic records
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
269 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Anaesthesia type

    1. Inhalational anaesthesia without Remifentanil use 2. Inhalational anaesthesia with Remifentanil use 3. Total intravenous anaesthesia

  • Blood pressure monitoring

    1. Intraarterial line use 2. Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anaesthesia technique

    Most common modality for anaesthesia maintenance

    Time frame: Perioperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood pressure monitoring

    If the use of IA line vs NIBP affected patient outcomes in terms of blood loss

    Time frame: Perioperative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Singapore General Hospital
    Singapore, Singapore
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04813289
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Mar 24, 2021

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion