An observational study in Obesity and Food Preferences, sponsored by Lia Bally. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-23.
Sponsored by Lia Bally · Observational
Obesity is currently one of the most substantial health burdens. Due to the production of marked and sustained weight loss, bariatric surgery is an increasingly used therapeutic modality to combat obesity and its comorbidities. Surgical rearrangement of the gastrointestinal tract remarkably alters metabolism and hormones acting on neurological and hypothalamic signalling involved in food decision-making and eating behaviour. In this context, many patients who underwent bariatric surgery self-report changes in appetite, satiety and food preferences. Furthermore, new gut hormone-based (e.g. GLP1-receptor agonist or GLP-1-RA) pharmacotherapies which mimic the effect of bariatric surgery show impressive efficacy on weight reduction by modulation of food behaviour. However, the mechanisms of such functional changes, and how they relate to food decision-making remain unknown.
In this project, the investigators propose a novel approach to unravel the effect of obesity treatments (surgical and non-surgical) on the neural coding of nutritional attributes and its impact on dietary choices using a combination of brain imaging, computational modelling of food behaviour and assessment of eating and food purchase behaviour in daily life.
The overall aim of this project is to elucidate the neurobehavioural underpinnings of food behaviour among obese adults and how food behavior is altered by different obesity treatments.To this end, the study consists of an experimental setting combining neurobehavioural tasks, computational modelling and functional brain imaging.
The main objective of Part 1 of the BrainFood-project is to elucidate if neural coding and food behaviour differ between obese adults and lean adults. The investigators hypothesize that subjective neural processes of nutritional food attributes differ between the obese and control participants, showing an unhealthier pattern among obese participants.
To this aim, the outcomes will be compared between groups (surgery group and control group).
6,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,718 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 132 across 1,339 observational studies indexed under Obesity.
Browse Obesity studies →Lia Bally is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Pilot protocol:
5 obese adults planned for bariatric surgery (Group 1) will be recruited by referral from our outpatient endocrine clinic and collaborating Centres of Excellence for Metabolic Surgery.
5 lean healthy adults (Group 2) matched for age-, sex- and education will serve as a control group and will be recruited through advertisement according to guidelines from swissethics.
Refined protocol:
20 obese adults planned for obesity treatment (Group 1) will be recruited by referral from our outpatient endocrine clinic and collaborating Centres of Excellence for Metabolic Surgery.
20 lean healthy adults (Group 2) matched for age and sex will serve as a control group and will be recruited through advertisement according to guidelines from swissethics.
Inclusion criteria (all participants):
Inclusion criteria for Group 1 (pilot protocol):
Inclusion criteria for Group 1 (refined protocol):
Inclusion criteria for Group 2 (pilot and refined protocols):
Exclusion criteria:
Pilot phase: 5 adults with class II-III obesity (BMI≥35kg/m2) planned for bariatric surgery will undergo functional imaging and neurobehavioural tasks before bariatric surgery. Refined protocol phase: 20 overweight adults (BMI≥30kg/m2 or BMI≥28kg/m2 with adiposity-related comorbidities (prediabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia)), referred for obesity treatment (surgical or non-surgical).
Other: Functional Brain Imaging and neurobehavioural tasks
Pilot phase: 5 healthy adults with normal body mass (BMI 18.5-24.9kg/m2) matched for age-, sex- and education will serve as a control group and undergo the same experiment. Refined protocol: 20 healthy adults with normal body mass (BMI 18.5-24.9kg/m2) matched for age and sex will serve as a control group and undergo the same experiment.
Other: Functional Brain Imaging and neurobehavioural tasks
Combination of 3 neurobehavioural tasks: Task 1 consists in subjective value rating of 64 food items. Participants are asked to rate how much they would want to eat the presented food item while fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging ) scanning is performed. Task 2 consists in rating of subjective nutrient factor of the same 64 food items. Participants will answer the following four categorical questions in randomized order for each item: low or high in added sugar/protein/fat and healthy or unhealthy. Task 3 consists of a decision-making task. Participants will be presented with two food items (out of the 64 food items), and asked to choose which of the two items they prefer to consume at the end of the experiment.
Representational similarity analysis to assess neural encoding of food attributes
Representational similarity analysis is used to analyse the correlation between a voxel-wise representational dissimilarity matrix and a behavioural representational dissimilarity matrix. The correlation of the activity of each voxel for each pair of food items is used to define the voxel-wise representational dissimilarity matrix. Similarly, the correlation of the subjective ratings for each pair of food items is used to define the behavioural representational dissimilarity matrix. The correlation between the voxel-wise representational dissimilarity matrix and the behavioural representational dissimilarity matrix is then assessed to determine if the voxels are encoding the food attributes.
Time frame: Continuously while participants perform the tasks (during 2.5 hours)
Nutrient factor weights
The nutrient factor weights are estimated using a linear regression with the subjective value ratings as dependent variable and nutrient factors ratings as independent variables and using a logistic regression with the choice as a dependent variable and the nutrient factor ratings as independent variables.
Time frame: Continuously while participants perform the tasks (during 2.5 hours)
Differences in activity in neural areas involved in self-control and valuation (Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, hippocampus)
Activity in the neural areas will be compared between groups
Time frame: Continuously while participants perform the tasks (during 2.5 hours)
Plan to share: Undecided — To support the development of transparent and open science, the data collected during this study can be published in open science repositories (e.g., Open Science Framework) or with the research articles after acceptance of the research articles. The data will be pseudo-anonymized prior to their publication and the faces will be removed from MRI scans to ensure anonymity.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Lia Bally