CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04811209Updated Jun 10, 2026

MCID and PASS for Acute Pain and Quality of Recovery After Orthopedic Surgery

An observational study in Pain Management, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2021; still recruiting 5 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study seeks to define what constitutes an MCID and a PASS in patients undergoing a variety of elective major orthopedic surgery.

Read the detailed description

Acute postoperative pain after orthopaedic surgery is common and approximately 40% of all surgical patients experience moderate-severe acute postoperative pain. Treatment of acute pain after surgery is important to relieve patient suffering, expedite resumption of activities of daily living, mitigate the risk of postoperative complications, speed ambulation and rehabilitation and hospital discharge. Good pain treatment requires proper and sound pain assessment to guide analgesic therapy. Past studies have determined the MCID values for a variety of chronic pain disorders. There are however limited data on the MCID for acute pain.At the present time, most perioperative acute pain studies use MCID values that are extrapolated from chronic pain studies yet the validity of MCID extrapolation remains unknown. Procedure-specific MCID for pain after most major orthopedic surgery has not been reported.The MCID for a patient reported outcome can be determined using an anchor and a distribution based method.The anchor based method uses a subjective Global Rating Scale (GRS) scale to assess patient's perception of pain relief after treatment. This is a 15-point Likert scale that ranges from -7 to +7 .Another method to determine the MCID value in pain is the distribution based method using mathematical calculations to generate 3 MCID values - 1) 0.3 standard deviation (SD) of mean change in NRS scores, 2) the standard error of measurement (SEM), and 3) 5% of the instrument range of the mean change in the NRS scores after an analgesic intervention according to patient-rated GAR scale. The SEM is calculated as the SD multiplied by the square root of 1 minus the intraclass correlation coefficient. The final MCID value is the average of 4 values, 1 generated from the anchored and 3 generated from the distribution based methods.

The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is another measure for patient-reported outcomes. It represents the threshold beyond which patients consider themselves well (satisfied) after an intervention. The PASS is an absolute value, not a change but this value will vary among patients. In essence, PASS indicates a state of wellbeing (feeling good) as opposed to MCID, a state of improvement (feeling better). The 2 concepts are complementary but contrary to MCID, the PASS is the outcome of interest, instead of the extent of improvement. To determine PASS, the patients are asked this question "In your opinion, do you consider your current pain state satisfactory after your operation?" Patients responding "yes" are considered having an acceptable pain state. The PASS is the 75th centile of the pain scale in those who rated their pain state as satisfactory. Higher baseline pain scores are often associated with higher PASS estimates. Little is known about PASS for acute pain after surgery thus a need to determine this benchmark to properly evaluate the clinical benefits of analgesic interventions.

Quality of Recovery (QoR) is another important PRO measure when evaluating the impact of novel intervention strategies. Quality of recovery can be assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire (scores 0-150) which measures physical \& mental well-being as an indication of the quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia.

To determine MCID for QoR, both the anchor and distribution based methods will be used. The patient will be asked "How would you rate your overall recovery from surgery since yesterday?" Patients will use the same GRS (-7 to +7) to measure their response. With the anchored-based method, the MCID is the mean change in the QoR-15 score when the patient reports a GRS score of +2 or +3. The distribution-based method will generate 3 other MCID values: 1) 0.3 standard deviation (SD) of the mean change in the QoR score; 2) the standard error of measurement (SEM); and 3) 5% of the instrument range. Again, the final MCID value is the average of 4 values, 1 generated from the anchored and 3 generated from the distribution based methods.

To determine PASS for QoR, the patients will be asked, "In your opinion, have you made a good recovery from your operation?" with response options of yes, no, or unsure. Those who give a positive response is considered having made a good recovery. The PASS for QoR is the 75th centile of the QoR-15 score in those who rated their recovery as good. The only MCID and PASS study by Myles reported a QoR-15 score of 8 \& 118 (out of 150), respectively, in patients undergoing a broad range of surgical procedures. Procedure-specific MCID \& PASS for QoR-15 after major orthopaedic surgery are currently unknown. Our proposed observational study seeks to define what constitutes an MCID and a PASS in patients undergoing a variety of elective major orthopedic surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management

Browse trials for

03

In context

Agnosia

1,190 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 508 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 120 across 147 observational studies indexed under Agnosia.

Browse Agnosia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Study patients will be recruited at Toronto Western Hospital

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18-80 years
  • ASA class I - III
  • Primary elective surgery
  • unilateral major shoulder surgery e.g., stabilization and arthroplasty procedures:
  • unilateral total hip replacement
  • unilateral total knee replacement, and
  • spinal decompression + fusion involving ≥ 2 levels.
  • Hospital admission for ≥ 24 hours after the surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Poor English comprehension
  • Psychiatric disorders e.g., dementia
  • Known allergies to morphine / hydromorphone
  • Chronic substance abuse and use of recreational drugs
  • Any medical disorder that impairs accurate and objective completion of questionnaires
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • single group, open labelled observational study with no blinding.

    All study patients will be managed per routine clinical practice and institutional standard for the performed surgery.

    Other: 1.Baseline Measurements Before Surgery · Other: 2.Intraoperative Anesthetic Management · Other: 3.Postoperative Analgesic Management · Other: 4.Postoperative NRS Pain Assessment · Other: 5.Postoperative Global Rating Scale (GRS) Pain Assessment · Other: 6.Postoperative Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Assessment for Pain · Other: 7.Postoperative Quality of Recovery Assessment · Other: 8.Other Postoperative Assessments

Interventions

  • Other1.Baseline Measurements Before Surgery

    * Baseline demographic data * Baseline physiological variables (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation) * Baseline investigations (hemoglobin, coagulation profile, serum electrolytes) if appropriate. * Preoperative pain state using NRS (0-10) * Preoperative functional state using the QoR-15 questionnaire * Pain expectation - patients will be asked preoperatively with the question "In a scale from 0 to 10 (where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable), what do you consider is an acceptable pain score for your first (and second) day after surgery?... Two weeks after surgery?" * Pain castastrophizing scale

  • Other2.Intraoperative Anesthetic Management

    All study patients will be managed per routine clinical practice and institutional standard for the performed surgery.

  • Other3.Postoperative Analgesic Management

    postoperative pain will be managed on the ward using a multimodal analgesic regimen as appropriate. This includes: 1. acetaminophen 650 - 1,000 mg given orally every 6 hours around the clock 2. NSAIDs e.g., celecoxib or other agents given orally around the clock per clinical guideline; omit if contraindicated or per surgeon's preference 3. Opioids e.g., hydromorphone 1-2 mg or oxycodone 15-30 mg given orally every 1-2 hours as required by the patient per standard nurse administered analgesic protocol. 4. In the event of severe pain refractory to the above treatments, the patient will be offered IV opioid e.g., intermittent doses of 0.2-0.4 mg hydromorphone IV every 10 minutes until pain becomes tolerable

  • Other4.Postoperative NRS Pain Assessment

    Pain assessment using NRS pain scores (0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain) will be performed by an independent research staff, starting immediately in the PACU and serially over the first 48 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge.

  • Other5.Postoperative Global Rating Scale (GRS) Pain Assessment

    Also, the degree of pain relief after treatment is assessed using a subjective 15-point Global Rating Scale (GRS) as mentioned above (Background). This is performed at the same time of each NRS assessment and a minimum of twice daily

  • Other6.Postoperative Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Assessment for Pain

    During each NRS pain assessment before or after an analgesic intervention on POD 0, 1 and 2, the patient will also be asked this question- ""In your opinion, do you consider your current pain state satisfactory after your operation?" Patients giving a positive response are considered having an acceptable pain state. The PASS is the 75th centile for the pain NRS score in those with a satisfactory pain state.

  • Other7.Postoperative Quality of Recovery Assessment

    The quality of recovery 15 questionnaire (QoR-15) to measure the dimension of quality of recovery will be administered once in the morning of POD 1 and POD 2. The MCID and PASS for QoR are determined in the same way as for NRS score. The final MCID value will be average of 4 values, 1 generated by the anchor based method and 3 generated by the distribution based method. The PASS for QoR is the 75th centile of the QoR-15 score in those patients who rated their recovery as good.

  • Other8.Other Postoperative Assessments

    Additionally, opioid related adverse effects e.g., nausea, vomiting, itchiness, constipation, sedation (RASS + Ramsay)/ and respiratory depression will be assessed daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MCID for NRS pain score after orthopedic surgery

    The MCID value represents the change in NRS score after treatment when the patient reports a small improvement of pain relief that corresponds to a GAR score of 2 or 3.

    Time frame: The first 48 hours after 4 types of major orthopedic

Secondary outcomes

  1. The PASS for NRS pain score after orthopedic surgery

    The PASS for NRS pain score after orthopedic surgery

    Time frame: The first 48 hours after 4 types of major orthopedic

  2. The amount of opioid consumption required to achieve MCID and PASS

    The amount of opioid consumption required to achieve MCID and PASS for acute pain after orthopedic surgery.

    Time frame: The first 48 h hours 4 types of major orthopedic

  3. Quality of recovery

    Quality of recovery as assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire (0-150), higher score means better recovery

    Time frame: The first 2 days after surgery

  4. The MCID and PASS for QoR-15

    The MCID and PASS for QoR-15 (0-150), higher score means better recovery

    Time frame: The first 2 days after surgery

  5. The incidence of opioid related adverse reactions and treatments required

    The incidence of opioid related adverse reactions and treatments required

    Time frame: The first 2 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Toronto Western Hopspital
    Toronto, Ontario M5T2S8, Canada
    • Jayanta Chowdhury, MBBS, MD · Contact · jayanta.chowdhury@uhn.ca · 4166035800
    • Anahi Perlas, MD, FRCPC · Contact
    • Anahi Perlas, MD. FRCPC · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04811209
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2021
Start date
Jun 21, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Jayanta Chowdhury, MBBS,MD
Contact
jayanta.chowdhury@uhn.ca
4166035800 ext. 2016
Anahi Perlas, MD, FRCPC
Contact
Anahi Perlas, MD, FRCPC
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion