A Phase 2 interventional study of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Solu-Medrol in Hepatitis, Drug-Induced, sponsored by Inge Marie Svane. Recruiting at 5 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-14.
Sponsored by Inge Marie Svane · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This clinical trial is to clarify and investigate the patterns of immune-related hepatitis and the optimal treatment choice for patients who are steroid-dependent. The project aims to prospectively characterize the various histopathological, biochemical, and phenotypical liver injury patterns induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors and the treatment responses to corticosteroids. Furthermore, the effect of adding a second-line immunosuppressive drug, either MMF in steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent cases will be explored and compared.
The number of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is expanding worldwide due to an increasing number of indications, including additional types of cancer, combination of ICI with other antineoplastic therapies and have recently moved into the adjuvant setting. According to clinical trial material, almost all patients in ICI treatment will eventually develop any grade of an adverse event, here, estimated in up to 90 percent of treated patients. Around 10-30 percent of ICI-treated patients will show signs of liver injury related to ICI treatment and will be diagnosed with immune-related hepatitis. The treatment hereof should include observation and medium-dose steroids in low-grade asymptomatic patients (grade ≤ 2 ir-hepatitis) and high-dose steroids in higher grades according to the current European and American guidelines. However, up to 25 percent of patients with ir-hepatitis may not respond properly to steroids due to primary resistance or relapse during tapering. These patients should be offered a second-line immunosuppressive treatment. The present recommendation for patients with steroid-dependent ir-hepatitis is based on the case series and includes immunosuppressive treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). To date, no evidence exists for which second-line treatment to choose.
However, in the clinic, the initiation of MMF may be delayed, meanwhile, patients are typically treated with an increased dose of steroids. In some cases, an increased dose of steroids with prolonged tapering can be sufficient. We want to explore if increased doses of steroids or adding MMF is the best strategy for relapse of hepatitis.
In addition, patients with signs of biliary or mixed liver injury may benefit from adding ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).
80 studies on the registry are indexed under Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; 21 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury.
Browse Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury studies →Inge Marie Svane is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Cohort A:
Cohort B:
Cohort A and Cohort B
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).
Your pathology report is the document that shows this.
PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.
PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Histologically or cytologically confirmed
The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).
Your pathology report is the document that shows this.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors
PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.
PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Excipients
The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients with ≥ 3 grade ir-hepatitis will be treated with high-dose steroids 2 mg/kg/day intravenously. A diagnostic liver biopsy will be taken. Patients with mixed or cholestatic liver injury patterns will be added UDCA. Treatment evaluation will be performed after 72 hours, patients in UDCA will be evaluated will be on day 7. Patients with sufficient steroid response defined as ≥ 20% reduction in ALT, AST, ALP or bilirubin at day 4 or day 7 will undergo steroid tapering with a transition to peroral steroids. Patients with initial insufficient treatment response, defined as less than \< 20% reduction in ALT, AST, ALP, or bilirubin, are considered as having a steroid-refractory condition and will be added MMF. In case of no response or increase of ALT, AST, ALP, or bilirubin during treatment with steroids plus MMF a third-line treatment may be introduced according to the individual treating hepatologist.
Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil · Drug: Solu-Medrol · Drug: Ursodeoxycholic acid · Drug: Prednisone tablet
Patients who experienced relapse of ir-hepatitis of grade ≥2 during prednisolone tapering or within one months after ended tapering will be randomized to either 100% dose of current steroid dose or restart of steroid 0.5-1 mg/kg versus adding MMF (if the patient received prednisolone the tapering plan hereof is continued, prednisolone up to 25 mg can be added if clinical indicated). Treatment efficacy is evaluated after seven days, if sufficient response the patients continued treatment, in case of insufficient response a cross-over will be performed.
Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil · Drug: Ursodeoxycholic acid · Drug: Prednisone tablet
Day 1: MMF 500 mg twice a day Day 2: MMF 1000 mg twice a day
Also known as: Cellcept, Myfenax
2 mg/kg/day
Also known as: Methylprednisolone, Medrol, Corticosteroids, Steroid
Patients with mixed or cholestatic liver injury pattern will also be administrated peroral UDCA according to weight
Also known as: ursochol
Shift from solu-medrol IV to peroral prednisolon. A tapering plan will be performed.
Also known as: steroid, Corticosteroids
Treatment-assessed hepatitis response rates
Treatment-assessed hepatitis response rates with steroids and steroids plus either mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Time to response or downgrading of liver injury in days
Time to response or downgrading of liver injury in patients with ≥grade 3 ir-hepatitis measured as; Days to ≥20 percent reduction in liver specific transaminases (ALT/AST) or bilirubin Days to shift to peroral prednisolone and discharge
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Relapse rate of immune related hepatitis ≥2 during tapering plan
Percent of patients with relapse to grade ≥2 hepatitis during steroid or during steroid plus either mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus tapering.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Time to downgrading of hepatotoxicity assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time to downgrading of hepatotoxicity from grade 4 to grade 3, to grade 2 and to grade 1, respectively, assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Description of histopathological changes in liver tissue
Number of patients with hepatocellular, cholestatic and mixed liver injury respectively, assessed by histological findings of predominant injury to hepatocytes, bile ducts or combined.
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Incidence of abnormal laboratory test results
Incidence of abnormal laboratory test results in blood
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Cumulated doses of corticosteroids and MMF respectively
Cumulated doses of corticosteroids and MMF respectively, during the study period of 6 months
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Cancer progression free survival at 6 months
Cancer progression free survival at 6 months
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Overall survival rates at 6 months
Overall survival rates at 6 months
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Blood biomarkers
Correlation of the baseline immune markers, genomics and other biomarkers in blood
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Description of changes in the fecal microbiome
Description of changes in the fecal microbiome and characterization of the prevalence of specific bacteria e.g. Faecalibacterium and Firmicutes
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Methylprednisolone Hemisuccinate
Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury →
Inge Marie Svane