An interventional study of Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy and Internet-based structured treatment-as-usual in Adjustment Disorders and Exhaustion Disorder, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-15.
Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Stress-related mental illness is common and one of the main causes of sick leave in Sweden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is a promising treatment, but access to treatment is low. In a previously conducted study, we found that internet-based CBT in comparison to a waitlist control group was effective in reducing symptoms of stress. The aim of the present study is to take the next step and compare Internet-based CBT for stress-related disorders to an active control condition.
Non traumatic stress-related mental illness, in this study operationalized as adjustment disorder or exhaustion disorder, is highly prevalent in the general population and associated with high societal costs relating to productivity loss. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is the most well-studied psychological treatment and has demonstrated promising effects in terms of symptom reduction. The overall evidence-base for CBT for these disorders is however fairly week and access to treatment is low. In a previously published randomized controlled trial we found that internet-based CBT can yield large effects on core symptoms of stress for these disorders. Delivering CBT via the internet has the large advantage of enabling increased accessibility as each therapist can have up to 80 patients in ongoing treatment. In the previously conducted trial we compared the treatment to a waitlist control and between-group comparisons of treatment effects were only done at post-treatment as the waitlist condition was crossed over to treatment after this time point. It is now therefore important to take the next step and investigate the effects of internet-based CBT in comparison to an active control condition. The primary aim of this study was to compare two internet-based treatments, CBT vs. structured treatment-as-usual, for adjustment disorder and exhaustion disorder.
Exclusion Criteria:
Behavioral: Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy
Behavioral: Internet-based structured treatment-as-usual
12 week Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy, delivered via an online treatment platform. The treatment includes components such as exercises in conducting recuperating activities, methods to improve sleep, exposure, and behavioral activation. The treatment content is provided through written texts, images and audiofiles in the treatment platform. The participant has access to a therapist who provides support throughout the treatment via asynchronous text messages.
This is a 12-week treatment, delivered via an online treatment platform. The treatment components in this treatment are designed to be similar to what is typically provided in primary care to these patients and includes information about stress and how different factors such as eating habits, physical exercise, and alcohol can contribute to stress problems. The treatment content is provided through written texts, images and audiofiles in the treatment platform. The participant has access to a therapist who provides support throughout the treatment via asynchronous text messages.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Change in PSS at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-40, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire (SMBQ)
Change in SMBQ at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 1-7, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Self-report (MADRS-S)
Change in MADRS-S at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-54, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Change in ISI at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-28, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Change in GAD-7 at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-21, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Sickness Questionnaire (SQ)
Change in SQ at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-30, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Self-rated Health (SRH)
Change in SRH at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 1-5, higher score means better self-rated health)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS 2.0)
Change in WHODAS at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-100, higher score means more functional disability)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
EuroQol 5D (EQ5D 5L)
Change in EQ5D at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (The answers given in EQ-5D were combined to generate a utility score of health states ranging from 0 to 1, with 0 representing death and 1 representing full health) death and 1 representing full health
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Trimbos and Institute Medical Technology Assessment of Costs Questionnaire for Psychiatry (TIC-P)
The TIC-P enables estimation of costs by collecting information about participant resource utilization and costs related to production loss. Change in costs will be analysed at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15)
Change in PHQ-15 at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-30, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Cognitive impairment
Test-battery of cognitive tests measuring executive functions at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Sick leave
Sick leave data from the Microdata for Analysis of Social Security (MiDAS) registry. Analyzed as full-day equivalents.
Time frame: 1 year prior to baseline up to 2 years after baseline.
Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale (KEDS)
Exploratory assessment of change at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-54, higher score means more symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Negative Events Questionnaire, 20-items (NEQ-20)
Post-treatment only report of negative events from treatment (scale range 0-80, higher score indicates more negative events)
Time frame: week 12 (Post-treatment)
Credibility scale (C-scale)
week 3 only report of treatment credibility (scale range 0-50, higher score means higher credibility)
Time frame: week 3
The Corona Virus Health Impact Survey -Short (CRISIS short)
Exploratory analysis of the impact of the Corona virus on worry and life style. Change in sum score of items 1,2,3,4,5,8 and 9 will be analyzed. Scale range 0-24. Higher scores mean higher impact of Corona.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Subjective memory
Exploratory analysis of change in subjective memory at post-treatment and follow-ups compared to baseline (scale range 0-26, higher score means more subjective problems with memory)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
Recovery Experience Questionnaire short version
Will be analyzed as potential mediator of treatment change. 7 items, scored 0-4. Scale-range 0-28. Higher scores indicate more recovery.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (post-treatment), 1-year follow-up, 2-year follow-up
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Karolinska Institutet