CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04794322Updated Sep 16, 2025

Developing a Test of Uterine Lavage for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer

An observational study in Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma and Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Recruiting at 6 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 30 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-16.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2020; still recruiting 6 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
250
Ages
30 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study aims to develop a test for early detection of ovarian cancer using DNA from a growth involving the ovary found in a washing of the uterus (womb), and proteins found in the blood. The samples of the wash and the blood will be taken before surgery. After surgery, doctors will determine whether the participant had ovarian cancer or a benign disease of the ovaries. The tests of the washings and the blood will be examined to see how much the participants with ovarian cancer can be separated from the participants with a benign ovarian disease by the tests. Small amounts from the washing and the blood samples will be sent to four sites for analysis.

Statistical analyses of these data will compare tumor DNA found in the washing of the uterus with proteins in the blood to detect cases of ovarian cancer. The primary goal is to find tests that are mostly positive for cases of ovarian cancer and mostly negative for patients with benign disease. It is hoped that if the tests work for participants with symptoms of the disease that these tests will also work when testing women who have no symptoms. A new study would be needed to see if the tests worked in this situation. If the tests work, this could lead to increasing the number of cases detected in early stage disease and decreasing the number of cases detected in late stage disease. If this change in late stage is large, it will likely reduce deaths due to ovarian cancer.

Read the detailed description

The study aims to elucidate the relative contributions to detection of ovarian cancer from tumor DNA in uterine lavage (UL) and protein biomarkers from blood using newly available detection and sample collection technologies. In this document, the term "ovarian cancer" includes fallopian tube cancer. In the first cohort, the study will enroll 200 participants. Enrolling participants prior to surgical diagnosis (e.g. laparoscopy or paracentesis) ensures the study will be "Prospective Collection of Samples, Blinded Evaluation" (PRoBE) compliant. The expectation is that \~50 of these participants will have pathologically confirmed ovarian cancer. In a second cohort, 50 participants will be enrolled. Based on published reports, it is expected that \~5 participants will have microscopic or low volume ovarian cancer. In each cohort, the participants with a pathologic invasive epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis will be defined as Cases and participants without any ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), or other cancer identified due to the surgery, will be defined as Controls. Other cancer groups are: (i) PPC, (ii) non-invasive serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions, (iii) non-epithelial ovarian cancers, and (iv) non-ovarian cancers.

Two sites will sequence DNA obtained from uterine lavages to detect tumor-derived DNA (tDNA): one will carry out Duplex Sequencing of TP53 and the second site will carry out Haloplex sequencing of an 18-gene panel. Two other sites will assay serum proteins: the first will use clinical grade assays for CA125 and HE4, and the second will use research grade assays for these two proteins plus four additional protein biomarker candidates. Statistical analyses of these data will evaluate the relative utility of tDNA and plasma proteins to detect Cases (sensitivity) while limiting detection of Controls (specificity) in these two cohorts. Remaining DNA from UL and blood based biospecimens in form of plasma, serum, and buffy coat will be stored at a biorepository at NCI Frederick for future biomarker investigations which include (but are not limited to) other methods of detecting tDNA from UL, tDNA from plasma, exosomal markers, and additional blood-based and UL biomarker candidates.

Primary objectives:

  1. To collect samples from 200 participants with suspected ovarian cancer (of which \~50 or more are expected to have pathologically confirmed ovarian cancer) and 50 participants undergoing a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (of which \~5 are expected to have microscopic or low volume ovarian cancer).
  2. To test the tDNA from uterine lavage samples for tumor-derived TP53 mutations, using Duplex sequencing, and for potential abnormalities in an 18-gene panel, using Haloplex sequencing
  3. To test the serum proteins with two assays: the first will use clinical grade assays for CA125 and HE4, and the second will use research grade assays for these two proteins plus four additional protein biomarker candidates.

Outline: Participants undergo two blood draws (one required, one optional) up to 31 days before surgery and a uterine lavage at the time of planned surgery. The tDNA and serum proteins are then extracted from the samples and sent for analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma
  • Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
  • High Grade Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma
  • Stage I Ovarian Cancer
  • Stage II Ovarian Cancer
  • Stage III Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IIIA Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IIIA2 Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IIIB Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IIIC Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IV Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IVA Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IVB Ovarian Cancer AJCC v8

Keywords

  • Uterine Lavage
  • Tumor DNA
  • Serum proteins
  • Ovarian neoplasms
  • Ovarian epithelial carcinoma
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Ovarian epithelial cancer
  • Neoplasms
  • Ovarian diseases
  • Early detection
03

In context

Ovarian Neoplasms

2,695 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 727 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 200 across 527 observational studies indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Cohorts will be selected from patients scheduled for ovarian disorder-related surgeries across six sites: Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts; Luminis Health System in Annapolis, Maryland; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland; Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco in San Francisco, California; the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, Washington; and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has intact uterus (no history of uterine ablation, tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy)
  • Cohort 1 (n=200 participants): Women scheduled for surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected but undiagnosed ovarian/fallopian tube cancer
  • Cohort 2 (n=50 participants): Known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current tissue or cytology diagnostic procedure positive for ovary cancer or any cancer
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Age less than 30 years
  • Inability to obtain the minimum amount of blood
  • Inability to obtain the minimum amount of uterine lavage sample
  • At risk if blood were drawn (e.g. hemophilia, serious anemia- Hb less than 8.0 gm/dL)
  • Prior history of known ovarian or endometrial cancer
  • Treatment less than 1 year (excluding hormonal therapy) for cancer that spread beyond its origin
  • History of untreated high-grade cervical dysplasia (CIN3)
  • History of treated high grade cervical dysplasia (CIN3) with a cytologically abnormal pap smear within the past year. If there is no post treatment Pap smear in the medical record, perform a Pap smear prior to the day of surgery. If this Pap smear is abnormal, the participant is ineligible.
  • Currently pregnant
  • Known Lynch syndrome
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pelvic Mass Cohort (cohort #1)

    200 participants scheduled for surgery for suspected ovarian cancer due to a pelvic mass but without a confirmed tissue or cytology diagnosis.

    Diagnostic Test: Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb · Diagnostic Test: Blood sample · Diagnostic Test: Pap smear

  • BRCA1/2 Carriers Cohort (cohort #2)

    50 participants with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutation without suspected ovarian cancers who are scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to remove ovaries and fallopian tubes.

    Diagnostic Test: Uterine lavage, or a wash of the womb · Diagnostic Test: Blood sample · Diagnostic Test: Pap smear

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testUterine lavage, or a wash of the womb

    Uterine lavage is performed during surgery using a flexible, 3-way balloon tipped catheter. The catheter is inserted through the cervix, the balloon expanded and the uterine cavity lavaged using 10 cc of sterile saline which is collected, processed and stored for later analysis.

  • Diagnostic testBlood sample

    Participants undergo two blood draws (one required, one optional) up to 31 days before surgery

  • Diagnostic testPap smear

    Participants undergo a standard Papanicolaou smear to collect cells and fluid from the cervix.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Genomic biomarkers assessing mutations and methylation of tumor DNA, and protein biomarkers measured as the concentration of a protein in pg/mL, both types of biomarkers measured in the collected biospecimens.

    Biomarkers that distinguish between ovarian cancer and benign ovarian disease

    Time frame: From enrollment through to pathology results post-surgery (usually same day)

07

Study locations

5 of 6 sites recruiting
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
    • Beth Scanlan · Contact · BScanlan@uams.edu · 501-686-8274
    • Kristin Zorn, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Anne Arundel Health System
    Annapolis, Maryland 21401, United States
    • Jaci Miller · Contact · jmiller9@aahs.org · 443-481-5738
    • Monica Jones, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
    • Rebecca Stone, MD · Contact · rstone15@jhmi.edu
    • Rebecca Stone, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
    Recruiting
  • The Swedish Hospital
    Seattle, Washington 98122, United States
    • Robert Pearhill · Contact · rpearhil@fredhutch.org · 206-667-3278
    • Charles Drescher, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7. PubMed 26742998 ↗
  • Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK, Amso NN, Apostolidou S, Benjamin E, Cruickshank D, Crump DN, Davies SK, Dawnay A, Dobbs S, Fletcher G, Ford J, Godfrey K, Gunu R, Habib M, Hallett R, Herod J, Jenkins H, Karpinskyj C, Leeson S, Lewis SJ, Liston WR, Lopes A, Mould T, Murdoch J, Oram D, Rabideau DJ, Reynolds K, Scott I, Seif MW, Sharma A, Singh N, Taylor J, Warburton F, Widschwendter M, Williamson K, Woolas R, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Parmar M, Skates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):945-956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17. PubMed 26707054 ↗
  • Skates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening: development of the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA) and ROCA screening trials. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318256488a. PubMed 22543916 ↗
  • Skates SJ, Greene MH, Buys SS, Mai PL, Brown P, Piedmonte M, Rodriguez G, Schorge JO, Sherman M, Daly MB, Rutherford T, Brewster WR, O'Malley DM, Partridge E, Boggess J, Drescher CW, Isaacs C, Berchuck A, Domchek S, Davidson SA, Edwards R, Elg SA, Wakeley K, Phillips KA, Armstrong D, Horowitz I, Fabian CJ, Walker J, Sluss PM, Welch W, Minasian L, Horick NK, Kasten CH, Nayfield S, Alberts D, Finkelstein DM, Lu KH. Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm with Frequent CA125 Testing in Women at Increased Familial Risk - Combined Results from Two Screening Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3628-3637. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2750. Epub 2017 Jan 31. PubMed 28143870 ↗
  • Rosenthal AN, Fraser LSM, Philpott S, Manchanda R, Burnell M, Badman P, Hadwin R, Rizzuto I, Benjamin E, Singh N, Evans DG, Eccles DM, Ryan A, Liston R, Dawnay A, Ford J, Gunu R, Mackay J, Skates SJ, Menon U, Jacobs IJ; United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study collaborators. Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1411-1420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330. Epub 2017 Feb 27. PubMed 28240969 ↗
  • Maritschnegg E, Wang Y, Pecha N, Horvat R, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Heitz F, Sehouli J, Kinde I, Diaz LA Jr, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Speiser P, Zeillinger R. Lavage of the Uterine Cavity for Molecular Detection of Mullerian Duct Carcinomas: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4293-300. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.3083. Epub 2015 Nov 9. PubMed 26552420 ↗
  • Krimmel JD, Schmitt MW, Harrell MI, Agnew KJ, Kennedy SR, Emond MJ, Loeb LA, Swisher EM, Risques RA. Ultra-deep sequencing detects ovarian cancer cells in peritoneal fluid and reveals somatic TP53 mutations in noncancerous tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):6005-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601311113. Epub 2016 May 5. PubMed 27152024 ↗
  • Risques RA, Kennedy SR. Aging and the rise of somatic cancer-associated mutations in normal tissues. PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 4;14(1):e1007108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007108. eCollection 2018 Jan. PubMed 29300727 ↗
  • Gilbert L, Basso O, Sampalis J, Karp I, Martins C, Feng J, Piedimonte S, Quintal L, Ramanakumar AV, Takefman J, Grigorie MS, Artho G, Krishnamurthy S; DOvE Study Group. Assessment of symptomatic women for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results from the prospective DOvE pilot project. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70333-3. Epub 2012 Jan 17. PubMed 22257524 ↗
  • Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15. doi: 10.1038/nature10166. PubMed 21720365 ↗
  • Kinde I, Bettegowda C, Wang Y, Wu J, Agrawal N, Shih IeM, Kurman R, Dao F, Levine DA, Giuntoli R, Roden R, Eshleman JR, Carvalho JP, Marie SK, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr. Evaluation of DNA from the Papanicolaou test to detect ovarian and endometrial cancers. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jan 9;5(167):167ra4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004952. PubMed 23303603 ↗
  • Pepe MS "The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction". Oxford University Press (2003)
  • Gilbert L, Revil T, Meunier C, Jardon K, Zeng X, Martins C, Arseneau J, Fu L, North K, Schiavi A, Ehrensperger E, Artho G, Lee T, Morris D, Ragoussis J. The empress of subterfuge: cancer of the fallopian tube presenting with malapropism. Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):1003-1004. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31586-6. No abstract available. PubMed 28872014 ↗
  • Greenwood A, Woodruff ER, Nguyen C, Piper C, Clauset A, Brubaker LW, Behbakht K, Bitler BG. Early Ovarian Cancer Detection in the Age of Fallopian Tube Precursors: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar 1;143(3):e63-e77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005496. Epub 2024 Jan 4. PubMed 38176019 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data is not anticipated to be shared.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04794322
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Anne Arundel Health System Research Institute, University of Arkansas, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Kaiser Permanente, McGill University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Swedish Medical Center, Early Detection Research Network
Responsible party
Steven Skates (Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2021
Start date
Apr 13, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2025

Study contacts

Jackie Dahlgren
Contact
jdahlgre@fredhutch.org
206 667 3438
Christos Patriotis, PhD
study director · National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion