ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04781790RIMEUpdated Mar 4, 2021

French National Registry of Bone Marrow Failures

An observational study in Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-04.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2017; still recruiting 9 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a unique clinical and biological database that collects standardized clinical information during the management of all patients with bone marrow failure syndromes (BMF) in France (multicenter registry), from diagnosis and throughout follow-up during the natural history of the disease, treated or not. In parallel, biological samples (blood and/or bone marrow and/or skin) are collected during clinical care and are biobanked in Saint-Louis Hospital (Hematology laboratory) in order to be used in translational research related to bone marrow failure diseases.

This registry has two main objectives:

  • Public health care evaluation and improvement: to assess the medical and social needs inherent to the management of these rare diseases; to precisely assess the level of diagnosis and management of bone marrow failure syndromes in France; to evaluate the impact and guidance of the French reference center guidelines for diagnosis and treatment; to evaluate the real-life efficacy and tolerance of any given specific treatments; to analyze treatment's cost-effectiveness according to each situation.
  • Research:

    • Epidemiology: to determine the incidence, prevalence, and distribution of different bone marrow failure syndromes at the national level;
    • Biology: to better understand the pathophysiology of BMF; to identify and to study complications within each entity, such as mechanisms underlying clonal evolution, new forms of inherited BMF and acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/MDS-predisposition syndromes, and to better and deeper characterize known entities;
    • Treatment: to identify prognostic factors and predictors of response; to identify side effects and impact of treatment on others organs and natural functions; to assess patients' quality of life as early as possible since diagnosis and throughout follow-up.
02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome

Keywords

  • aplastic anemia
  • Fanconi anemia
  • blackfan diamond anemia
  • telomeropathies
  • inherited aplastic anemia
  • acquired aplastic anemia
  • medullary hypoplasia
03

In context

Bone Marrow Failure Disorders

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Marrow Failure Disorders; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 5,000 is above the median of 350 across 19 observational studies indexed under Bone Marrow Failure Disorders.

Browse Bone Marrow Failure Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,576 studies on the registry; 1,028 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with bone marrow failure syndromes (BMF)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All age
  • All diagnostic of BMF
  • Having given his non-opposition to registry after understand overall aims
  • Having signed a written informed consent (2 parents for patients aged less than 18) for collection of biological samples
  • With health insurance coverage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

With myelodysplastic syndrome occurring in a patient over the age of 50 in absence of genetical predispositions, familial forms and history of medullary hypoplasia

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with Bone marrow failure

    Standard of care of patients with bone marrow failure

    Other: Bone Marrow Failure

Interventions

  • OtherBone Marrow Failure

    without interventional intervention . biological collection in the routine care Standard of care of patients with bone marrow failure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of bone marrow failure

    Time frame: at 10 years

  2. Distribution of different bone marrow failure syndromes

    Time frame: at 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30- v3 questionnaire

    Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.

    Time frame: at inclusion

  2. Quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30- v3 questionnaire

    Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.

    Time frame: at 10 years

  3. mechanisms underlying a clonal evolution or AML/MDS syndroms

    Time frame: at 10 years

  4. Proportion of patients with new forms of constitutional aplasias

    Time frame: at 10 years

  5. Proportion of patients with complications within each entity

    Time frame: at 10 years

  6. Prognostic factor ans treatment response

    Time frame: at 10 years

  7. Pathophysiology of bone marrow failures

    Time frame: at 10 years

  8. Global response to treatment

    Time frame: at 10 years

  9. Incidence and outcome of extra hematological complications including solid tumors, fertility

    Time frame: within 10 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hématologie Greffe
    Paris, France
    • Regis PEFFAULT DE LATOUR · Contact
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 120 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 1, 2021
First posted
Mar 4, 2021
StartActual
Feb 6, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Feb 6, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 6, 2027
Last update
Mar 4, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04781790
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2021
Start date
Feb 6, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 6, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 4, 2021

Study contacts

Régis Peffault De Latour
Contact
regis.peffaultdelatour@aphp.fr
+33142385073
Matthieu Resche-Rigon
Contact
matthieu.resche-rigon@u-paris.fr
+3341499742

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion