CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04781049Updated Feb 21, 2023

Transperineal Laser Ablation vs Transurethral Resection for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

An interventional study of Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of Prostate and Trans-Urethral Resection of Prostate in Prostate Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, sponsored by San Carlo di Nancy Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-21.

Sponsored by San Carlo di Nancy Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to compare Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of Prostate versus Trans-Urethral Resection of Prostate in the immediate impact on post-operative pain; in terms of relief in benign prostatic obstruction and preservation of the ejaculatory function in the short term (at 1, 3 and 6 months).

The secondary objective of the study is the evaluation of the long-term deobstructive effectiveness (12 months).

Read the detailed description

Consecutive patients coming to our institution affected by benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) with indication to surgery and strong need of ejaculatory preservation will be enrolled in the present randomised controlled trial study after counseling. After an informed consent is obtained, uroflowmetry with calculation of the post-voiding residual volume (PVR), a transrectal ultrasonography to estimate prostate volume (PVol), the international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) questionnaire with quality of life (QoL) assessment, and the evaluation of the ejaculatory sexual function will be performed in all patients.

Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of Prostate (TPLA) will be performed using the EchoLaser combined system (Elesta, Italy).

During the procedure, two 21G spinal needles are inserted transperineally in the peri-urethral area under ultrasound-guidance. By optical fibers, a maximum energy of 1800 J at a power of 3 Watts is delivered. If necessary, the fibers are eventually pulled-back. Immediately after the procedure, the patients will be asked to fill in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the assessment of the pain perceived. Perioperative data and postoperative data including assessment of ejaculatory function will be analyzed at different time points.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Hyperplasia
  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
  • Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow Obstruction

Keywords

  • TPLA
  • TURP
  • BPH
  • BPO
  • LUTS
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

783 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 174 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 97 across 593 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

San Carlo di Nancy Hospital is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • signed written informed consent
  • patient able to complete the Whole protocol
  • IPSS score ≥ 10
  • Maximum urinary flow rate \< 15 ml/sec
  • Prostate volume at preop. ultrasonography \< 100 mL
  • normal urinalysis (all of the above)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • former prostate surgery
  • prostate cancer (history)
  • urethral stricture (history)
  • Marion's disease (history)
  • bladder stones
  • median obstructive lobe, as defined by a > 1 cm of prostate abutting in the bladder lumen at ultrasonography
  • neurological conditions potentially impacting on the bladder voiding (at least one of the above)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TPLA (Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of Prostate)

    Participants who undergo Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of Prostate

    Procedure: Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of Prostate

  • Active comparator
    TURP (Trans-Urethral Resection of Prostate)

    Participants who undergo the standard treatment, namely Trans-Urethral Resection of Prostate

    Procedure: Trans-Urethral Resection of Prostate

Interventions

  • ProcedureTrans-Perineal Laser Ablation of Prostate

    TPLA treatment will be performed using the EchoLaser EVO system (Elesta SpA - Calenzano, FI, Italy). EchoLaser EVO consists of four echolasers, a multi-source laser system with a wavelength of 1064nm and Echolaser Smart Interface (ESI), a treatment planning device for safely inserting introductor needles and optical fibers into prostate tissue. EchoLaser therapy is a micro-invasive percutaneous procedure that uses laser light transmitted through applicators (optical fibers) for a few minutes, causing a heating of the affected tissue to its irreversible damage in "situ", without the need to remove it. EchoLaser therapy, through flat-tip fibers, produces an ellipsoidal clotting area (area where the tissue has irreversible damage). EchoLaser therapy will be performed under ultrasound guidance.

  • ProcedureTrans-Urethral Resection of Prostate

    TURP is the gold standard for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. It will be performed by using a bipolar energy resectoscope. The procedure will be carried out with patient in a lithotomic position.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analogue Scale. A standardized assessment of perceived pain. Scaled from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10 points.

    Time frame: Differences between preoperative and 4-hours postoperative

  2. Change in Ejaculatory function as assessed by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory function domain (EJ-MSHQ)

    EJ-MSHQ questionnaire will be used for a standardized assessment. Scaled from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 25 points.

    Time frame: Differences among preoperative status versus 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery

  3. Changes in Sexual function as assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire (IIEF)

    IIEF questionnaire will be used for a standardized assessment. Scaled from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 25 points.

    Time frame: Differences among preoperative status versus 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    Standardized Evaluation of the relief in prostate symptoms score. Scaled from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 35 points.

    Time frame: Differences among preoperative status versus 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery

  2. Changes in Quality of Life (QoL)

    Standardized Evaluation of the improvement in Quality of Life. Scaled from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 6 points.

    Time frame: Differences among preoperative status versus 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery

  3. Changes in the maximum urinary flow rate at Uroflowmetry (Qmax)

    objective improvement of maximum urinary flow rate at uroflowmetry. Measured in ml/s, scaled from 0 to the maximum of the distribution (usually no more than 50 ml/s)

    Time frame: Differences among preoperative status versus 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • San Carlo di Nancy Hospital
    Roma, RM 00175, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available. PubMed 12559262 ↗
  • Martin SA, Haren MT, Marshall VR, Lange K, Wittert GA; Members of the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study. Prevalence and factors associated with uncomplicated storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms in community-dwelling Australian men. World J Urol. 2011 Apr;29(2):179-84. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0605-8. Epub 2010 Oct 21. PubMed 20963421 ↗
  • Gacci M, Corona G, Vignozzi L, Salvi M, Serni S, De Nunzio C, Tubaro A, Oelke M, Carini M, Maggi M. Metabolic syndrome and benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/bju.12728. Epub 2014 Aug 16. PubMed 24602293 ↗
  • Kupelian V, Wei JT, O'Leary MP, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Link CL, McKinlay JB; BACH Survery Investigators. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and effect on quality of life in a racially and ethnically diverse random sample: the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 27;166(21):2381-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2381. PubMed 17130393 ↗
  • Parsons JK. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2010 Dec;5(4):212-218. doi: 10.1007/s11884-010-0067-2. Epub 2010 Sep 7. PubMed 21475707 ↗
  • Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5):1549-57; discussion 1564. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5. PubMed 1279218 ↗
  • Siroky MB, Olsson CA, Krane RJ. The flow rate nomogram: II. Clinical correlation. J Urol. 1980 Feb;123(2):208-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55859-0. PubMed 7354519 ↗
  • Biester K, Skipka G, Jahn R, Buchberger B, Rohde V, Lange S. Systematic review of surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia and presentation of an approach to investigate therapeutic equivalence (non-inferiority). BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(5):722-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10512.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22. PubMed 21883855 ↗
  • Perera M, Roberts MJ, Doi SA, Bolton D. Prostatic urethral lift improves urinary symptoms and flow while preserving sexual function for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.031. Epub 2014 Nov 15. PubMed 25466940 ↗
  • de Rienzo G, Lorusso A, Minafra P, Zingarelli M, Papapicco G, Lucarelli G, Battaglia M, Ditonno P. Transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate, a novel option for minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Aug 28. PubMed 32868137 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study will be subject of publication. The data will be available upon request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04781049
Lead sponsor
San Carlo di Nancy Hospital
Collaborators
Elesta S.R.L.
Responsible party
Riccardo Bertolo (Assistant Professor, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2021
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2021
Completion
Oct 6, 2022
Last update
Feb 21, 2023

Study contacts

Pierluigi Bove, MD
principal investigator · San Carlo di Nancy Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion