CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04769336Updated Feb 24, 2021

Effectiveness of Point of Care Complete Blood Cell Count Analyzer in Reducing Time to Results

An observational study in Laboratory Problem, sponsored by Northwestern Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-24.

Sponsored by Northwestern Medicine · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
10 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The current process for getting complete blood cell counts (CBC) results in the operating room during surgery relies on sending blood samples from the operating room to the hospital's central lab. This workflow is complex and often results in handing off the blood sample to 4 or more different staff members before arriving in the lab for analysis. This often causes delayed CBC results, which may lead to inappropriate or delayed clinical decision making. By providing prompt access to CBC results with the use of a point of care CBC analyzer, the clinical workflow efficiency can be significantly improved. This should resulting in better clinical decision making, reductions in costs, increase in patient satisfaction and facilitation of hospital processes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laboratory Problem
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Northwestern Medicine is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients coming for surgery

Inclusion criteria

  • All English speaking patients, 18 years or older, having surgery in the Lake Forest Hospital operating rooms, with a pre-existing indication for CBC analysis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients not meeting inclusion criteria or protected patient populations, specifically, pregnant women, prisoners, cognitively impaired patients, patients unable to consent, students, employees, and children)
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient

    Each patient will undergo simultaneous testing with two different CBC analyzers.

    Device: Central Lab based CBC · Device: Point of Care CBC

Interventions

  • DeviceCentral Lab based CBC

    lab samples will be sent to the central lab for CBC analysis

  • DevicePoint of Care CBC

    lab samples will be analyzed at point of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to result

    Time between blood draw and CBC result displayed in Electronic medical record

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital
    Lake Forest, Illinois 60045, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04769336
Lead sponsor
Northwestern Medicine
Responsible party
Andrew Gostine, MD (Anesthesiologist, Northwestern Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2021
Start date
Apr 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion