ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04752176Updated Feb 18, 2021

Evaluation of the Elimination of Tinnitus and Hyperacusis by the ØREBLUE® Method

An observational study in Tinnitus and Hyperacusis, sponsored by Mayfair Developments. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-18.

Sponsored by Mayfair Developments · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tinnitus and hyperacusis are two hearing disorders that can severely impact the patient and their quality of life, as they may induce sleeping disorders, concentration troubles, social life disturbances. Mayfair Developments has created and developed the innovating ØREBLUE® method in order to relieve, possibly completely, tinnitus and hyperacusis symptoms. The ØREBLUE® method relies on a medical device, CE marked, that consists of an auditory stimulation box associated with five softwares. This medical device diffuses thanks to a headphone a specific and personalized sound therapy treatment for the patient. This retrospective, observational study aims at collecting data about the ØREBLUE® method used in routine care and describing its efficacy on tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Read the detailed description

Tinnitus is a clinical symptom indicative of abnormal stimulation of the auditory system characterized by the perception of chronic sound in the absence of an external sound source and that only the affected subject perceives intrusively.Its presence can occur independently unilaterally, bilaterally, or be described as perceived in the center of the head and can be heard continuously or intermittently at varying levels of intensity and frequency. There are two types of tinnitus depending on whether it can be detected with a stethoscope by the doctor (objective tinnitus) or only heard by the subject (subjective tinnitus). Many consequences, such as anxiety, depression and sleep disorders, linked to suffering from tinnitus will impact daily life in different forms.

Both types of tinnitus may be accompanied by a higher intolerance to noise which is called hyperacusis.Hyperacusis is defined as an intolerance (and not a finer sensitivity to sounds) to environmental sound levels, the intensity of which, of varying intensity, represents neither risk nor inconvenience for people with normal hearing, but which induces discomfort or pain in people with hyperacusis.

In these clinical situations, the ØREBLUE® method is an innovative treatment with the objective of eliminating the symptoms of tinnitus and hyperacusis depending on the group to which the subject belongs. Its innovative character is based on the design of a sound signal processing device, CE marked as medical device, developed by Mayfair Developments. This technological innovation has been developed to respond specifically to the hearing profile of each subject and to provide personalized rehabilitation of their hearing sphere.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tinnitus
  • Hyperacusis

Keywords

  • Tinnitus
  • hyperacusis
  • Medical device
  • ØREBLUE® Method
03

In context

Tinnitus

444 studies on the registry are indexed under Tinnitus; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 57 observational studies indexed under Tinnitus.

Browse Tinnitus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Mayfair Developments as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Data will be retrospectively collected from consecutive patients suffering from tinnitus and/or hyperacusis and treated in the investigational site by the ØREBLUE® Method since the CE marking date and up to 3 years-time.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 85 years old
  • Subject seen in consultation in the site from CE marking up to 2 years thereafter,
  • Sufficient ENT investigations,
  • Satisfactory general condition: non-invalidating medical history (ENT disorders and others),
  • The subject agrees to work on the emotional part linked to their condition,
  • Permanent and disabling tinnitus and/or hyperacusis, with the following characteristics for tinnitus: subjective, chronic (present for more than 1 year), resistant to usual treatments (medication, hearing aid with or without masking, psychotherapy) continued for a minimum of 6 months, severe tinnitus, disabling tinnitus (measurement with numerical scale score and THI questionnaire),
  • Patient informed about the study and has no objection to take part

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Proven presence of an anxiety disorder of claustrophobia type,
  • History of neurological disease, in particular personal or family history of epilepsy or seizure (infantile hyperthermic convulsions, or other type of seizure),
  • Serious psychiatric history or attempted autolysis, concomitant use of antidepressant and neuroleptic treatment,
  • Bilateral cophosis,
  • Medication monitoring that can generate more or less tinnitus,
  • More than 6 months since the end of the last treatment or therapy against tinnitus,
  • For women: possibility of pregnancy (absence of effective or certain menopause), breastfeeding woman,
  • Context of medico-legal litigation and / or concomitant participation in another protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Tinnitus group

    At least 20 patients suffering from tinnitus will be enrolled in the study.

    Device: ØREBLUE® Method

  • Hyperacusis group

    At least 20 patients suffering from hyperacusis will be enrolled in the study.

    Device: ØREBLUE® Method

Interventions

  • DeviceØREBLUE® Method

    The ØREBLUE® Method combines 2 inseparable therapeutic approaches that will be personalized, one dedicated to the auditory symptom (personalized sound therapy based on music and delivered through a helmet as part of the device), the other dedicated to the psychology of the subject. Sound rehabilitation will be based on successive treatment sequences. The 1st sequence includes 30 hours of listening, at a rate of 2 hours / day, 5 days a week. A period of 4 to 6 weeks is necessary before carrying out a new sequence. The second sequence (and subsequent ones when necessary, respecting a 4-to-6-weeks window in between) of sound rehabilitation consists of 20 hours distributed as for the first sequence.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Discomfort

    Discomfort level is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no discomfort" and 10 means "indescribable discomfort".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hyperacusis Symptoms change

    Hyperacusis symptoms are assessed with the Hyperacusis Handicap Inventory (HHI) questionnaire

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  2. Hyperacusis discomfort level

    Disconfort level due to hyperacusis, in Decibels, during audiometric measurements

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  3. Tinnitus Symptoms change

    Tinnitus symptoms are assessed with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  4. Quality of life change

    Quality of life is assessed through WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  5. Sleep quality change

    Sleep quality is assessed through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  6. Depression

    Depression is assessed through the Beck Depression Inventory (BPI) questionnaire

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  7. Anxiety

    Anxiety is assessed through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  8. Anxiety level

    Anxiety level is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no anxiety" and 10 means "worst anxiety".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  9. Appetite level

    Appetite level is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no impact on appetite" and 10 means "worst impact on appetite".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  10. Energy level

    Energy level is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no impact on energy" and 10 means "worst impact on energy".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  11. Emotionality

    Emotionality is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no impact on emotionality" and 10 means "worst impact on emotionality".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  12. Concentration ability

    Concentration ability is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no impact on concentration ability" and 10 means "worst impact on concentration ability".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  13. Hopelessness feeling

    Hopelessness feeling is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no hopelessness feeling" and 10 means "worst hopelessness feeling".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

  14. Isolation feeling

    Isolation feeling is rated on a numerical scale, from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no isolation feeling" and 10 means "worst isolation feeling".

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 10 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2022, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 3, 2021
First posted
Feb 12, 2021
StartActual
Mar 22, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Mar 30, 2022
CompletionEst.
Jan 2023
Last update
Feb 18, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04752176
Lead sponsor
Mayfair Developments
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2021
Start date
Mar 22, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 18, 2021

Study contacts

Natacha CHETRITT-BONNEYRAT
Contact
contact@hir-france.com
(0)5 46 28 74 41 ext. +33
Natacha CHETRITT-BONNEYRAT
principal investigator · Mayfair Developments

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion