ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04744870TIMEUpdated Feb 9, 2021

Tissue Monitoring During Endovascular Intervention

An observational study in Peripheral Arterial Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease and Arterial Occlusive Diseases, sponsored by Pedra Technology, PTE LTD. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-09.

Sponsored by Pedra Technology, PTE LTD · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
40 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tissue perfusion assessment is key to more accurate measurement of foot ischemia, which is in turn an important factor in appropriate treatment decisions. In practice though, tissue perfusion measurements are not routinely undertaken as few practical solutions exist that are easy to use and fit in everyday clinical practice. Pedra has developed a novel, easy to use, non-invasive device that can be used in practice to better inform treatment decisions.

Read the detailed description

Tissue perfusion assessment is key to more accurate measurement of foot ischemia, which is in turn an important factor in appropriate treatment decisions. In practice though, tissue perfusion measurements are not routinely undertaken as few practical solutions exist that are easy to use and fit in everyday clinical practice. Pedra has developed a novel, easy to use, non-invasive device that can be used in practice to better inform treatment decisions.

This is a feasibility study to demonstrate the ability of the Xauron system to track tissue perfusion changes in patients undergoing endovascular intervention for the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The findings of this study are for research purposes and will also be used to help with the future education of physicians about the potential use of the Xauron system. In addition, this early pilot data will be used to help power larger, more definitive studies relating to the intra-procedural use of the Xauron system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
  • Peripheral Artery Disease
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases
03

In context

Peripheral Arterial Disease

1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 190 across 427 observational studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Pedra Technology, PTE LTD is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This is a prospective, multi-center, observational, feasibility study to collect tissue perfusion data throughout the duration of a standard of care (SOC) endovascular intervention, alongside live video capture of the angiography utilized during the case. The study will enroll up to 80 subjects between the ages of 40 and 90 who are undergoing endovascular intervention for the management of their PAD. The protocol is designed for sites to enroll approximately half of the subjects with primary "below the knee disease".

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject is undergoing endovascular intervention for the management of their PAD.
  • The subject is between 40 and 90 years of age.
  • Documented lower limb arterial occlusive or stenotic disease (using ankle-brachial index / pulse volume recording, duplex ultrasound or CT angiogram) within the last 8 weeks.
  • In the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol and complete all protocol assessments.
  • Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has willingly provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects on an investigational drug or being treated with an investigational therapeutic device, within 30 days of the study visit, that in the view of the Investigator might interfere with the study outcomes.
  • Presence of a condition that the Investigator considers will compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study.
  • Subjects on renal replacement therapy
  • Signs of active infection causing localized inflammation on the plantar or dorsal surfaces of the foot.
  • Diabetic subjects with a Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy
  • Lack of intact skin, or pathological skin conditions, at the proposed sensor pad positions that may impair or prevent the adherence of medical adhesives in general.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Integration of Xauron System into clinical workflow - The Investigator will complete a questionnaire assessing that the Xauron system can be integrated within the angiography suite for all subjects observed.

    To confirm that the Xauron system can be integrated into the angiography suite clinical workflow.

    Time frame: Measured at the SOC index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relationship between interventional events of procedure and perfusion changes detected by Xauron System

    Measure the time from end of an intervention to the zenith or nadir of the subsequent perfusion change

    Time frame: Measured at the SOC index procedure

  2. Relationship of perfusion data from different anatomical locations during procedure

    Determine the ratio of perfusion in the arm relative to the foot after an intervention

    Time frame: Measured at the SOC index procedure

  3. User feedback from the team in the angiographic suite

    To obtain user feedback from the team in the angiography suite, to improve the user interface between the device and the operators.

    Time frame: Measured at the SOC index procedure

  4. Relationship between changes in perfusion during intervention and the clinical outcomes of patients using the Walking Score.

    Evaluate the relationship between changes in perfusion during the intervention and the clinical outcomes of the patients in terms of changes in the Walking Score.

    Time frame: Measured through 3-month follow-up

  5. Angiographic images to evaluate and understand perfusion monitoring

    Collate data and angiographic images/video that may help endovascular teams understand and utilize perfusion monitoring in the angiography suite.

    Time frame: Measured at the SOC index procedure

  6. Relationship between changes in perfusion during intervention and the clinical outcomes of patients using the Pain Score.

    Evaluate the relationship between changes in perfusion during the intervention and the clinical outcomes of the patients in terms of changes in the Pain Score.

    Time frame: Measured through 3-month follow-up

  7. Relationship between changes in perfusion during intervention and the clinical outcomes of patients using the SF-36 Score

    Evaluate the relationship between changes in perfusion during the intervention and the clinical outcomes of the patients in terms of changes in the SF-36 score.

    Time frame: Measured through 3-month follow-up

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2021; primary completion for Nov 2021, 8 months later.

Of 58 industry-sponsored observational studies under Peripheral Arterial Disease, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 197 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 83.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 1, 2021
First posted
Feb 9, 2021
StartEst.
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2021
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2022
Last update
Feb 9, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04744870
Lead sponsor
Pedra Technology, PTE LTD
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2021
Start date
Mar 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 9, 2021

Study contacts

Jeremy Moyer
Contact
jmoyer@abioclinical.com
610-509-6727

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion