A Phase 3 interventional study of Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab and Pembrolizumab in Lung Neoplasms and Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Terminated at 188 sites in 23 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.
Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (part of Merck & Co., Inc) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 127 studies testing pembrolizumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung — 29 open to participants now, 48 under way, 13 of them phase 3. pembrolizumab · Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.
Among the 127 studies testing pembrolizumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, this one is the 4th largest by enrollment, is one of 8 that started in 2021, is one of 28 in phase 3, and was the 81st registered.
7,620 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,838 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1,264 is above the median of 62 across 6,019 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.
Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →29 of the 127 studies testing pembrolizumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung are open now, in 10 countries. Each count lists the studies.
pembrolizumab: first FDA approval 2014 (KEYTRUDA), first EMA approval 2015. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →
Of the 1,324 Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies recruiting now, 986 (74%) set no upper age limit and 226 (17%) stop at 75 or younger; 34 take children under 18; 39 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →On this site’s reading of the record, pembrolizumab is the treatment under test here. Read study by study →
127 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2013; this study’s year is marked. 8 started in 2021.
Median enrollment 65 across the 127 interventional studies. Of the 67 that completed or were terminated, 56 (84%) have results posted.
39 of 127 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,166 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.
Of its 501 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 370 (74%) have results posted.
83 studies in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC: 13 open now, 25 under way, 18 of them phase 3. Of 58 finished, 46 (79%) have results posted.
Among the 83 studies in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, this one is the 2nd largest by enrollment of the 82 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2021, is one of 38 in phase 3, and was the 57th registered.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC’s Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies by the year they started, since 2000.
14 of the studies testing pembrolizumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 3 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07162883Phase 3Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Pharmacokinetic Study of QL2107 Versus Keytruda® for Adjuvant Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT04380636Phase 3Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCStudy of Pembrolizumab With Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy Followed by Pembrolizumab With or Without Olaparib in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (MK-7339-012/KEYLYNK-012) | 2027-05-05 |
| NCT05085028Phase 3Imperial College LondonA Randomised Open-label Phase III Trial of REduced Frequency Pembrolizumab immuNothErapy for First-line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | 2027-05-31 |
| NCT03769129Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityEvaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Combined With MWA for Advanced NSCLC | 2026-11-01 |
| NCT05493566Emory UniversityLow-Dose Interleukin-2 and Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | 2027-01-07 |
Among the 127 studies testing pembrolizumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, from their registry updates:
Among Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC’s 83 in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung:
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat people with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is PD-L1 positive.
The goal of this study is to learn if people who receive vibostolimab and pembrolizumab live longer overall and without the cancer getting worse than people who receive pembrolizumab alone.
The protocol-specified futility analysis of the primary outcome measure was completed with a data cut-off of 05-Sep-2024 (Primary Completion Date) and served as the final analysis of the primary outcome measure. Per protocol, 58 participants enrolled after the primary completion date and will be analyzed in the End of Trial analysis.
7,620 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,838 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1,264 is above the median of 62 across 6,019 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.
Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,166 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.
Of its 501 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 370 (74%) have results posted.
Compared within Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Lung Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies:
Exclusion Criteria:
Has received prior systemic chemotherapy or other targeted or biological antineoplastic therapy for their NSCLC.
Has received a live or within 30 days prior to the first dose of study intervention. Administration of killed vaccines is allowed.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).
Your pathology report is the document that shows this.
The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.
The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.
The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.
“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.
PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.
PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.
Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).
Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.
Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.
Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.
After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Histologically or cytologically confirmed
The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).
Your pathology report is the document that shows this.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Measurable disease
The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.
The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
RECIST
The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.
“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors
PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.
PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ECOG performance status
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Adjuvant and neoadjuvant
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Washout period
A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Live vaccines
Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Brain metastases
Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).
Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Excipients
The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Autoimmune disease
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hepatitis B tests
Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.
Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hepatitis C tests
Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.
After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Line of therapy
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab / 200 mg vibostolimab as a coformulation (MK-7684A) by intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 35 administrations, until centrally verified disease progression, or until a protocol specified discontinuation criterion was met. Per investigator's discretion, eligible participants with stable disease, or partial/complete response who received a first course treatment may have received a second course of treatment based on original randomization assignment for up to 17 cycles (up to \~1 year).
Biological: Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab
Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab by IV infusion Q3W for up to 35 administrations, until centrally verified disease progression, or until a protocol-specified discontinuation criterion was met. Per investigator's discretion, eligible participants with stable disease, or partial/complete response who received a first course treatment may have received second course of treatment based on original randomization assignment for up to 17 cycles (up to \~1 year).
Biological: Pembrolizumab
Drug pages: Pembrolizumab · Vibostolimab
Coformulation of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) 200mg and vibostolimab (MK-7684) 200mg. Participants receive the coformulation by intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 35 administrations (up to \~2 years).
Also known as: MK-7684A
Participants receive 200 mg of pembrolizumab by intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 35 administrations (up to \~2 years).
Also known as: MK-3475, Keytruda
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to ~39 months
OS in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to ~39 months
OS in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to ~39 months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
PFS in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
PFS in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The percentage of participants who experience a CR or PR as assessed by blinded independent central review based on RECIST 1.1 will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
ORR in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The percentage of participants who experience a CR or PR as assessed by blinded independent central review based on RECIST 1.1 will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
ORR in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The percentage of participants who experience a CR or PR as assessed by blinded independent central review based on RECIST 1.1 will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
Duration of Response (DOR) in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
For participants who demonstrate a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. The DOR as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
DOR in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
For participants who demonstrate a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. The DOR as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
DOR in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
For participants who demonstrate a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. The DOR as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) (Items 29, 30) Combined Score on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/QoL (Items 29, 30) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/QoL (Items 29, 30) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Role Functioning (Items 6, 7) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Role Functioning (Items 6, 7) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Role Functioning (Items 6, 7) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Dyspnea Score (Item 8) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Dyspnea Score (Item 8) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Dyspnea Score (Item 8) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Cough Score (Item 31) on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Lung Cancer-Specific Questionnaire Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Cough Score (Item 31) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Cough Score (Item 31) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Chest Pain Score (Item 40) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Chest Pain Score (Item 40) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Change From Baseline in Chest Pain Score (Item 40) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/QoL (Items 29, 30) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Global Health Status/QoL (Items 29, 30) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Global Health Status/QoL (Items 29, 30) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1% to 49%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Role Functioning (Items 6, 7) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Role Functioning (Items 6, 7) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Role Functioning (Items 6, 7) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Dyspnea Score (Item 8) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Dyspnea Score (Item 8) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Dyspnea Score (Item 8) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Cough Score (Item 31) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Cough Score (Item 31) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in Cough Score (Item 31) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in in Chest Pain Score (Item 40) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in in Chest Pain Score (Item 40) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
TTD in in Chest Pain Score (Item 40) on the EORTC QLQ-LC13 in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1%
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~56 months
Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
The number of participants who experienced an adverse event (AE) will be presented. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
The number of participants who discontinue study intervention due to an adverse event (AE) will be presented. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Time frame: Up to ~56 months
| Milestone | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 594 | 612 |
| Treated | 593 | 610 |
| Received pembrolizumab/vibostolimab (mk-7684a) second course | 1 | 0 |
| Received pembrolizumab second course | 0 | 3 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 594 | 612 |
| Withdrew: Participant ongoing in study | 298 | 297 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 7 | 9 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Death | 287 | 306 |
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
| Months | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥50% | 15.7 (12.4 to 24.0) | 20.3 (16.7 to 24.2) |
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
| Months | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab |
|---|---|---|
| OS in Participants With PD-L1 TPS ≥1% | 15.0 (12.7 to 17.4) | 16.4 (14.9 to 19.1) |
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
| Months | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab |
|---|---|---|
| OS in Participants With PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49% | 14.3 (11.3 to 17.8) | 14.3 (11.7 to 16.1) |
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The percentage of participants who experience a CR or PR as assessed by blinded independent central review based on RECIST 1.1 will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The percentage of participants who experience a CR or PR as assessed by blinded independent central review based on RECIST 1.1 will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The percentage of participants who experience a CR or PR as assessed by blinded independent central review based on RECIST 1.1 will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
For participants who demonstrate a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. The DOR as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
For participants who demonstrate a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. The DOR as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
For participants who demonstrate a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. The DOR as assessed by blinded independent central review will be presented.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6-7 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about their role functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Higher scores indicate a worse level of function. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
TTD in the score of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTD is defined as the time to first onset of 10 or more (out of 100) deterioration from baseline and confirmed by a second adjacent 10 or more deterioration from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The number of participants who experienced an adverse event (AE) will be presented. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The number of participants who discontinue study intervention due to an adverse event (AE) will be presented. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Collected over Up to approximately 39 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab First Course | 291/594 (49%) | 249/593 (42%) | 478/593 (80.6%) |
| Pembrolizumab First Course | 310/612 (50.7%) | 220/610 (36.1%) | 472/610 (77.4%) |
| Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab Second Course | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) | 1/1 (100%) |
| Pembrolizumab Second Course | 0/3 (0%) | 0/3 (0%) | 2/3 (66.7%) |
| Event | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab First Course | Pembrolizumab First Course | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab Second Course | Pembrolizumab Second Course |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PneumoniaInfections and infestations | 57/593 | 56/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 14/593 | 8/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 13/593 | 12/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations | 10/593 | 8/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 10/593 | 6/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| DeathGeneral disorders | 5/593 | 10/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| COVID-19Infections and infestations | 8/593 | 6/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 7/593 | 8/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 7/593 | 4/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| SepsisInfections and infestations | 1/593 | 7/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Event | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab First Course | Pembrolizumab First Course | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab Second Course | Pembrolizumab Second Course |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations | 21/593 | 9/610 | 1/1 | 0/3 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 145/593 | 117/610 | 0/1 | 1/3 |
| HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders | 56/593 | 67/610 | 0/1 | 1/3 |
| Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations | 32/593 | 27/610 | 0/1 | 1/3 |
| PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 106/593 | 57/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 92/593 | 53/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 74/593 | 84/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 78/593 | 79/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 73/593 | 72/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
| Weight decreasedInvestigations | 72/593 | 69/610 | 0/1 | 0/3 |
Per protocol, analysis population consisted of all participants randomized by the primary completion data cut-off.
| Age, Continuous(Years) | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 66.5 ± 9.8 | 66.3 ± 10.2 | 66.4 ± 10.0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 177 | 172 | 349 |
| Male | 417 | 440 | 857 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 152 | 132 | 284 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 434 | 471 | 905 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 8 | 9 | 17 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 24 | 28 | 52 |
| Asian | 247 | 271 | 518 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| White | 291 | 288 | 579 |
| More than one race | 25 | 22 | 47 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status(Participants) | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECOG = 0 | 165 | 163 | 328 |
| ECOG = 1 | 429 | 448 | 877 |
| ECOG = 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status at Baseline(Participants) | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPS ≥ 50% | 272 | 307 | 579 |
| TPS 1-49% | 322 | 305 | 627 |
| Geographic Region(Participants) | Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab | Pembrolizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| East Asia | 239 | 260 | 499 |
| Non-East Asia | 355 | 352 | 707 |
Showing the first 100 of 188 sites across 23 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: Yes — https://trialstransparency.msdclinicaltrials.com/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Data sharing details ↗ · externaldatasharing-msd.com
Ran from Apr 2021 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 40 months.
Results were first posted in Aug 2025, 11 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drugs tested here: Pembrolizumab · Vibostolimab
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung →