CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06882174TIME-NSCLCUpdated Dec 8, 2025

This Study is Comparing Morning vs Random Scheduling of Standard of Care Pembrolizumab Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Infusions in Patients With Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Scheduling of the time of pembrolizumab infusions in Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by AHS Cancer Control Alberta. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-08.

Sponsored by AHS Cancer Control Alberta · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial is comparing morning infusions of the study drug (pembrolizumab) to random infusion scheduling for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Participants will be randomized to either the Intervention (Morning Group) where Infusion start times are restricted between 0800 AM and 1000 AM or to the Control (Standard of Care) group where scheduling will occur as standard of care scheduling, in which infusions are scheduled without respect to a specific time of day.

There are past studies that suggest the timing of treatment may influence immune response and outcomes. This idea is called chronotherapy. Chronotherapy explores the notion that the timing of drug administration in relation to the body's internal clock can optimize treatment effectiveness. The timing of the infusions for the morning group was therefore, chosen based on data from these past studies that looked at circadian variation in immune system function with the intent to focus on similar infusion windows.

The aim of this study is to provide confirmation that the intervention is possible to achieve and use these results to design a larger study. Circadian timing of drug administration, if effective, would represent an intervention that could improve survival outcomes at no additional cost or apparent increase in toxicity, which is truly rare in oncology.

Participants are asked to participate in the study intervention for 18 weeks (6 cycles of pembrolizumab), after which participants would continue with ad hoc scheduling as per standard of care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
03

In context

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

6,491 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,633 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 58 is close to the median of 62 across 5,216 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

AHS Cancer Control Alberta is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with histologic diagnosis mNSCLC with PDL1 staining ≥ 50% on standard of care IHC testing
  2. Patients must be eligible for treatment with standard-of-care pembrolizumab
  3. Patients must be 18 years of age or older.
  4. Patients must be capable of providing consent to enrolment and willing to comply with study, treatment and follow-up.
  5. Patients with a performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 (Oken et al., 1982) will be eligible for enrolment
  6. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum (or urine) pregnancy test within 7 days prior to the first dose of pembrolizumab. WOCBP is defined as any female who has experienced menarche and who has not undergone surgical sterilization (hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy) and is not postmenopausal. Menopause is defined as 12 months of amenorrhea in a woman over age 45 years in the absence of other biological or physiological causes.
  7. Patients of childbearing / reproductive potential should use adequate birth control methods, as defined by the investigator, during the study treatment period. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as those that result in low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly.

    Note: abstinence is acceptable if this is established and preferred contraception for the patient and is accepted as a local standard.

  8. Absence of any condition hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow- up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.
  9. The following adequate organ function laboratory values must be met:

Hematological:

  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1.0
  • Platelet count >100
  • Hemoglobin >90 mg/dL

Renal:

o Serum creatinine \<3x upper limited of normal (ULN)

Hepatic:

  • Total serum bilirubin \<2x ULN
  • AST and ALT \<3x ULN

Coagulation:

o International Normalized Ratio (INR) \<1.5x ULN (unless patient is receiving anticoagulant therapy and if PT or PTT is within therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concurrent therapy with systemic therapy other than pembrolizumab (such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, other checkpoint inhibitors, or hormonal therapy).
  2. Treatment plan includes local therapy such as radiation or surgery.
  3. Untreated symptomatic brain metastases, or previously treated brain metastases requiring corticosteroids for symptom control. Patients with untreated asymptomatic brain metastases, where all lesions are \< 2cm in size with no vasogenic edema, are eligible.
  4. Presence of leptomeningeal disease.
  5. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C. Testing for HIV, HBV or HCV is not mandatory for enrolment to study but may occur at the discretion of the investigator.
  6. Active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in past 12 months (i.e. with use of disease modifying agents, requiring >10mg prednisone or equivalent or other immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (e.g. thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency, etc.) is not considered a form of systemic treatment.
  7. Participant unwilling to agree to their treatment times being scheduled as per study protocol during the study treatment period (Cycles 1-6).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
58 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention (Morning Infusion)

    The intervention in this study is scheduling of the time of pembrolizumab infusions. This group will have their infusion start times restricted to between 0800 AM and 1000 AM .

    Drug: Scheduling of the time of pembrolizumab infusions

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    This group will undergo randomized scheduling in which infusions are scheduled without respect to a specific time of day. The start time of each infusion that will occur during the study intervention period will be randomized into 1 of 3 time periods: 1000 AM to 1200 PM, 1201 PM to 1400 PM, and 1401 PM to 1700 PM. Randomization of scheduling in the Standard of Care Group approximates the typical ad hoc scheduling of infusion times done as standard of care, with reduction in potential for bias on the part of those involved in scheduling given the unblinded nature of the intervention. The time windows for the Standard of Care group have been chosen to allow infusions to be scheduled throughout the day without overlap with the specific scheduling window of the Morning Group, in order to simplify interpretation of clinical outcomes.

    Drug: Scheduling of the time of pembrolizumab infusions

Interventions

  • DrugScheduling of the time of pembrolizumab infusions

    The intervention in this study is scheduling of the time of pembrolizumab infusions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of progression free survival at 18 weeks

    PFS is defined as the time between the date of treatment initiation and the date of disease progression (determined utilizing RECIST 1.1 criteria) or death (whatever the cause), whichever occurs first. The rate of PFS at 18 weeks will be determined based on the number of participants who remain alive and whose disease has not progressed in each study arm at the 18 weeks imaging assessment. Comparison will be made to the baseline pretreatment computed tomography (CT) +/- magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, to be completed within 6 weeks of treatment start.

    Time frame: The rate of PFS at will be analyzed at week 18

  2. Rate of deviation from scheduling intervention

    Deviation from the scheduling intervention is defined as having occurred when a pembrolizumab infusion is started outside of the pre-specified time window. The deviation rate will be calculated both for all infusions for all study participants together, and for the infusions occurring for the participants in the individual study arms independently.

    Time frame: Analysis of the scheduling intervention deviation rate will occur during the interim analysis (when 20 participants have completed the study intervention period), and ~90 days following completion of the 1-year follow-up period (end of study)

  3. Dropout Rate

    Participant drop out is defined as voluntary withdrawal from the study prior to completion of study intervention period (between first pembrolizumab infusion and end-of-study visit at Week 19). The dropout rate will be calculated both for all study participants, and for the participants in the individual study arms independently.

    Time frame: Analysis of the dropout rate will occur during the interim analysis (when 20 participants have completed the study intervention period), and ~90 days following completion of the 1-year follow-up period (end of study)

Other outcomes

  1. Progression free survival

    PFS is defined as the time between the date of treatment initiation and the date of disease progression (determined utilizing RECIST 1.1 criteria) or death (whatever the cause), whichever occurs first. For participants who remain alive and whose disease has not progressed, PFS will be censored on the date of last survival follow-up assessment at \~1 year after initiation of pembrolizumab treatment. PFS will be based on the disease assessment or date of death provided by the investigator.

    Time frame: The final analysis of PFS using the Log-Rank method will be scheduled to occur approximately 90 days following completion of the 1-year follow-up period for the final participant enrolled to study (i.e. end of study analysis).

  2. Overall survival

    OS is defined as the time between the date of treatment initiation and the date of death (whatever the cause)

    Time frame: The analysis of OS using the Log-Rank method will be scheduled to occur approximately 90 days following completion of the ~1-year follow-up period for the final participant enrolled to study (i.e. end of study analysis).

  3. Objective response rate at 18 weeks

    Objective response rate (ORR) will be determined utilizing RECIST 1.1 criteria (Eisenhauer et al., 2009). Baseline staging diagnostic imaging will be compared to imaging at 18 weeks.

    Time frame: Objective Response Rate will be analyzed at week 18

  4. Treatment-related toxicity

    Proportion of patients with all grade or grade 3 or higher treatment related immune-related toxicity as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

    Time frame: The analysis of treatment-related toxicity will be scheduled to occur approximately 90 days following completion of the 1-year follow-up period for the final participant enrolled to study (ie., end-of-study analysis)

  5. Peripheral blood correlates of immune response

    Analysis of peripheral blood for peripheral cytokine response and phenotyping of the peripheral immune cell repertoire.

    Time frame: Peripheral blood will be collected prior to the initial pembrolizumab treatment, and then prior to each subsequent pembrolizumab infusion during the study intervention period (Week 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, and 19)

  6. Sensitivity analyses

    Participants in the Standard of Care randomized scheduling group will have a variable amount of their infusion occur in the morning or afternoon. A sensitivity analysis of PFS using the Log-Rank method will be performed including only those patients from the Standard of Care randomized scheduling group who have more than 25%, and more than 50% of their pembrolizumab infusions occurring after 1400 pm

    Time frame: Sensitivity analyses will be performed approximately 90 days following completion of the 1-year follow-up period for the final participant enrolled to study (end-of-study analysis)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06882174
Lead sponsor
AHS Cancer Control Alberta
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 18, 2025
Start date
May 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 8, 2025

Study contacts

Matthew Anaka, MD, PhD, FRCPC
Contact
Matthewross.anaka@ahs.ca
780-577-8082

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion