ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04726683Updated Nov 15, 2023

Dry Needling vs Injection in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders

An interventional study of Dry needling and placebo injection and Injection and placebo dry needling in Temporomandibular Disorders, sponsored by Josue Fernandez Carnero. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-15.

Sponsored by Josue Fernandez Carnero · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective is to compare the effectiveness of dry needling in improving pain and disability versus placebo, and versus infiltration, in patients with myofascial temporomandibular dysfunction in the short, medium and long term.

02

Conditions studied

  • Temporomandibular Disorders

Keywords

  • dry needling
  • Temporomandibular Disorders
03

In context

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

621 studies on the registry are indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; 161 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is above the median of 46 across 439 interventional studies indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

Browse Temporomandibular Joint Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Josue Fernandez Carnero is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects aged between 18 and 60 years.
  2. Pain of more than 6 weeks of evolution in the craniofacial region.
  3. TMD with origin in the masticatory musculature according to the "DC-TMD" criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous injection or dry needling intervention (3 months) on the masseter muscle.
  2. Arthrogenous TMD.
  3. History of trauma, infection in the temporomandibular joint in the last 6 months.
  4. Coagulation disorders.
  5. Pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dry needling

    Trigger point dry needling on an active myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.

    Procedure: Dry needling and placebo injection

  • Experimental
    Injection

    Trigger point injection of lidocaine on an active myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.

    Procedure: Injection and placebo dry needling

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Combines sham dry needling + sham injection.

    Procedure: Placebo dry needling and placebo injection

  • Active comparator
    Dry needling + Injection

    Combines experimental dry needling and injection

    Procedure: Dry needling and injection

Interventions

  • ProcedureDry needling and placebo injection

    Dry Needling is applied with a filiform needle to penetrate the skin and stimulate the underlying myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle. Dry needling is combined with placebo injection, in which the tip of a beveled needle is cut and the process of injection is simulated without penetrating the skin.

  • ProcedureInjection and placebo dry needling

    Lidocaine injection applied in the myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle. Lidocaine injection is combined with placebo dry needling, in which the tip of a filiform needle is cut and the dry needling technique simulated without penetrating the skin

  • ProcedureDry needling and injection

    Dry Needling is applied with a filiform needle to penetrate the skin and stimulate the underlying myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle. Dry needling is combined with lidocaine injection applied in the myofascial trigger point of the masseter muscle.

  • ProcedurePlacebo dry needling and placebo injection

    Placebo dry needling, in which the tip of a filiform needle is cut and the dry needling technique simulated without penetrating the skin. Placebo dry needling is combined with placebo injection, in which the tip of a beveled needle is cut and the process of injection is simulated without penetrating the skin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain perception (Change is being assessed)

    Self reported Visual Analog Scale. Minimum value is 0 (best); Maximun value is 10 (worst).

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Believability of placebo

    Patients beliefs about group allocation: A scale of cale of four options (Experimental Dry needling / Experimental Injection / Placebo Comparator / Active Comparator) in which patients had to indicate which intervention they believe they have received during the treatment sessions.

    Time frame: At one week, at two weeks, at three weeks, at for weeks

  2. Disability

    Self-reported disability questionnaire: Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI). The CF-PDI contains 21 items divided into 2 subscales according to their content and exploratory factor analysis: "pain and disability" and "jaw functional status."

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  3. Pressure pain threshold (Change is being assessed)

    Digital algometer measure of the pressure pain threshold on the masseter muscle

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  4. Conditioned pain modulation

    Pressure pain thresholds measure on the distal phalanx of the thumb before and during the application of a noxious stimulus ( Ischemic pain)

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  5. Temporal summation (TS)

    Initially, a needlle stimulus is measured locally and distally. Then, the TS is triggered by 10 consecutive pressures on the PPT at the pressure determined at each location. For each pulse, the pressure was gradually increased at a rate of 2 kg/s at the determined PPT and held for 1 s before being released (with an interval of one second between each stimulus).

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  6. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    The level of depressive symptomatology was measured by the Spanish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); a 21-item self-report rating scale that assesses affective, cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression. Each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  7. Anxiety (STAI questionnaire)

    The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) is a questionnaire that measures trait anxiety (a personality factor that predisposes the patient to suffer from anxiety) and the state of anxiety (environmental factors that protect or generate anxiety). Each of the two sub-scales (trait anxiety and state anxiety) consists of 20 items, ranging from 0 (nothing) to 3 (a lot).

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  8. Kinesiophobia (TAMPA scale)

    Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. To assess the fear of movement and pain-related fear. The 11 items are scored 1-4, with total scores ranging from 11 to 44. The addition of all the points obtained from each of the items results in the level of kinesiophobia, with higher scores indicating greater perceived kinesiophobia

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  9. Fair avoidance beliefs (FAB questionnaire)

    Fear-avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire . The instrument consists of two subscales, a four-item physical activity subscale, and a seven-item work subscale. Each item is scored from 0 to 6 and summed to produce the subscale score. Possible scores range from 0-28 to 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater fear avoidance beliefs.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  10. Pain catastrophizing (PCS)

    Pain catastrophizing Scale (PCS). This tool is a 13-item questionnaire designed to measure the three components of pain-related catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness, resulting in a unique score. Each item is responded to on a 5-point scale (0 not at all, 4 all the time) relating the degree to which the individual experiences a thought or feeling of a painful situation.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  11. Expectation of improvement

    Patients´ expectations of pain improvement after the intervention. Patients report their estimated pain perception after the treatment by completing a Self reported Visual Analog Scale. Minimum value is 0 (best); Maximun value is 10 (worst).

    Time frame: Baseline, at one week, at two weeks, at three weeks, at for weeks

  12. Central sensitization inventory

    It serves to identify the symptoms related to central sensitization. It consists of 25 items that are scored from 0: never to 4: always reaching a maximum score of 100. Results are interpreted as follows: subclinical = 0 to 29; mild = 30 to 39; moderate = 40 to 49; severe = 50 to 59; and extreme = 60 to 100.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  13. Mandibular Dynamic

    Interincisal distance measured in cm.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  14. Neuropathic pain

    The presence of neuropathic pain will be assessed using the DN4 questionnaire validated in Spanish. This clinician-administered questionnaire consists of 10 questions. Seven of them are related to the quality of pain and are based on the patient interview, and the remaining three are based on clinical examination according to the presence or absence of hypoesthesia and tactile allodynia to pressure and touch.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  15. Pain body map

    The patient will be asked to paint the areas where he/she presents pain. This map consists of a representation of a person drawn in an anterior, posterior and two lateral planes. The drawing is in a grid of 10mm x 10mm, 16mm x 16 mm cells, up to a maximum of 256 cells.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

  16. EQ-5D

    . It consists of two parts: the descriptive EQ-5D system and the VAS. It is a generic and standardized questionnaire, self-administered, simple to answer and with low cognitive load.

    Time frame: At baseline, 24h post treatment, at one month, at six months and at twelve months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clínica Universitaria de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
    Alcorcón, Madrid 28922, Spain
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2023, 36 months after the start.

Of 246 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 250 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 13, 2020
First posted
Jan 27, 2021
StartActual
Nov 23, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2024
Last update
Nov 15, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04726683
Lead sponsor
Josue Fernandez Carnero
Responsible party
Josue Fernandez Carnero (Professor, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2021
Start date
Nov 23, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 15, 2023

Study contacts

Josue Fernandez Carnero, PhD
Contact
josue.fernandez@urjc.es
914888949

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion