CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04703985GAGNEUpdated Dec 7, 2023

Evaluation of the Success of Prophylactic Enteral Nutrition in Therapeutic Intensification With Autograft of Autologous Hematopoietic Cells in Hematology

An observational study in Lymphoma and Myeloma, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-07.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

When the digestive tract is functional, learned societies recommend the use of a nutritional support by enteral feeding. Indeed, it has many advantages (maintenance of gut trophicity, reduction of the risk of infection by reducing the incidence of bacterial translocations,...). It has been used for about fifteen years in hematology departments and offers promising results in the context of allogeneic transplantation with prospective trials in progress (NEPHA study). However, its tolerance has not been studied during autologous transplantation. This study aims to assess the success of enteral nutrition in this setting.

Read the detailed description

In the literature, there are many studies on the nutritional support to be used during allografts, that highlight the superiority of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition in terms of reducing co-morbidities.

Enteral nutrition is the nutritional support recommended by learned societies for therapeutic intensification with autograft of autologous hematopoietic cells in hematology. Nevertheless, enteral nutrition presents difficulties in its implementation and failures (refusal of patients, probes vomiting, neutropenic colitis, etc.), requiring the use of parenteral nutrition in case of failure.

In this context, the study proposes to assess the success and effectiveness of enteral nutrition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lymphoma
  • Myeloma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Autologous stem cell transplantation
  • Enteral feeding
  • Myeloma
  • Lymphoma
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 136 across 625 observational studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with lymphoma or myeloma

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with lymphoma or myeloma
  • Patient admitted for therapeutic intensification with autologous hematopoietic cells who are eligible for nutritional support by enteral nutrition
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the enteral nutrition
  • All patients with absolute or enteral nutrition contraindications:
  • Digestive fistula
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Intestinal ischemia
  • Active digestive bleeding
  • Digestive malabsorption (short hail syndrome, bariatric surgery, gastrectomy)
  • Trauma to the base of the skull or significant deviation of the nasal septum not allowing the insertion of an naso gastric probe.
  • Esophagitis or barrett's esophagus
  • Persistent gastro-duodenal dysfunction (gastroparesis)
  • Patients admitted for autograft for the treatment of conditions other than lymphoma or myeloma (e. g. solid tumours or leukaemia)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients under the protocol of Enteral Nutrition

    Patients put under the protocol of Enteral Nutrition adapted to the conditioning autograft (BEAM or Melphalan 200)

    Dietary Supplement: Enteral Nutrition

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementEnteral Nutrition

    Protocol of Enteral Nutrition adapted to the conditioning autograft (BEAM or Melphalan 200)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of enteral feeding

    Enteral Nutrition will be considered as a success if : TEI / ER \> 70%. On average until recovery from aplasia (or transfer to the intensive care unit or death). TEI : Total Energy Intake (per-os + enteral nutrition + glucose solutions) ER : Energy Requirement (assessed patient needs)

    Time frame: From admission to recovery from aplasia (or transfer to the intensive care unit or death)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Causes of failure of enteral nutrition

    All causes of primary or secondary failure that necessitated the cessation of enteral nutrition

    Time frame: From admission to recovery from aplasia (an average of 3 weeks)

  2. Evolution of total energy intake

    All sources of energy intake (per-os, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, glucose solutions) These will be compared to the estimated needs of patients and expressed as a % of coverage of these needs

    Time frame: Every day from admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  3. Evolution of albuminemia

    Blood test carried out on admission and once a week

    Time frame: Once a week from admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  4. Weight evolution

    Weighing carried out on admission and on discharge. Will be used to calculate the percentage of weight loss and assess nutritional status

    Time frame: From admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  5. Evolution of muscular strength

    Measurements performed at admission and at discharge of the patient. Muscular strength is measured using a dynamometer (in kg)

    Time frame: From admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  6. Number of bacteremia and type of germs

    Time frame: From admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  7. Number of transfers to the intensive care unit

    Time frame: From admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  8. Duration of hospitalization

    Number of days of hospitalization

    Time frame: From admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  9. Prokinetic and associated antiemetic treatments

    Time frame: From admission to discharge (an average of 4 weeks)

  10. Type conditioning

    BEAM or Melphalan 200

    Time frame: On admission, between 1 and 7 days before autologous stem cell transplantation

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • CH de la Côte Basque
    Bayonne, France
  • CHU Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04703985
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 11, 2021
Start date
May 20, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2023
Completion
Nov 6, 2023
Last update
Dec 7, 2023

Study contacts

Sébastien DAVID
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion