CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04694794D-CRSEUpdated Sep 1, 2023

Diminish Chemotherapy Related Side Effects Through Patient Education

An interventional study of Educational Brochure in Chemotherapeutic Toxicity, Chemotherapeutic Agent Toxicity and Chemotherapy Effect, sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-01.

Sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Currently, there is a lack of patient education materials regarding cytotoxic chemotherapy side effects, research supported treatments, and the utilization of CAM by cancer patients at Penn State Cancer Institute. The investigators aim to develop an educational brochure, which educates patients about the chemotherapy side effects they may experience, and provide them with the tools to address the problem themselves, know when to contact their medical oncologist, and understand when it is appropriate to go to the Emergency Department. By educating patients regarding these problems, patient anxiety may decrease, the number of calls into the oncologist office may decrease, and Emergency Department visits may decrease, which would decrease costs for the patient, the hospital, and the health system. If this intervention is found to be useful and impactful, it can be further utilized within the Cancer Institute by other disease teams, by other Penn State institutions, or by other institutions across the country.

Read the detailed description

The diagnosis of cancer is a life-altering event which can cause a large amount of distress in patients. One of the several factors that impacts a patient's level of distress, is their fear of the diagnosis and their lack of information in the beginning their cancer journey. Understandably, many patients turn to easily accessible but disreputable resources, such as the internet, to learn and mentally prepare themselves for this journey. Friends and family members may also provide advice or recommendations which may not always be scientifically supported. Disreputable resources often have incorrect information that can scare or mislead a patient, which can severely impact their health and fight against cancer. In order to help patients fight these fears and become properly equipped for the cancer journey, care teams must address the education of patients, especially the education about the chemotherapy treatment process and potential side effects.

The primary purpose of this pilot study is to determine the utility of a brochure to educate breast and gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy about the side effects of treatment, in addition to providing them with tools and recommendations to lessen the impact of these side effects on their quality of life. A questionnaire-based approach and the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT) will be employed to evaluate participant's responses in a variety of domains, such as understandability, actionability, and utility of the brochure. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) will be used to capture the specific chemotherapy side effects that each patient is experiencing throughout their treatment. Emotional Thermometer Scales (ETS) will be utilized to assess patients' feelings of depression, anxiety, anger, and distress at the beginning and end of their treatment. Survey questions will be utilized at interval time points (baseline plus 6 and 12 weeks) to evaluate the overall impact of the brochure on their quality of life and symptom management. All patients will receive the brochure and fill out the associated assessment scales and tools. The investigator's hypothesis is that a brochure providing information and tools to address the side effects of breast and gastrointestinal cancer cytotoxic chemotherapy will have utility in cancer clinics and allow patients to improve their quality of life by following the scientifically supported recommendations within the brochure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chemotherapeutic Toxicity
  • Chemotherapeutic Agent Toxicity
  • Chemotherapy Effect
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 480 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with a diagnosis of breast or gastrointestinal cancer, at any stage or progression, who are cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment naïve and initiating treatment or have newly begun cytotoxic chemotherapy within the last 6 weeks. Patients receiving multiple therapy forms, such as immune or humoral, can be included if they are also receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy as a part of their regimen. All patients will receive the brochure, therefore, there will not be a control arm in this study.

    1. Adult >20 year of age
    2. Ability to understand and read written English without any functional difficulty
    3. ECOG performance status 0-3
    4. May be involved with other cancer trials being offered at the Penn State Cancer Institute

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Inability to give informed consent
  2. Pregnant females
  3. Inability to understand or read written English
  4. Patients who have previously undergone cytotoxic chemotherapy at any point in their lifetime or began chemotherapy for their breast or gastrointestinal cancer greater than 6 weeks from the initiation of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interventional

    Single arm, interventional. All participants will be administered Educational Brochure to educate them regarding management of side effects experienced during chemotherapy treatment

    Other: Educational Brochure

Interventions

  • OtherEducational Brochure

    Participants will be provided with Education Brochure developed by the study team to provide information to patients about managing side effects related to chemotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Utility of Educational Brochure assessment

    • Assessment of the utility of a brochure which educates breast and gastrointestinal cancer patients about the potential side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy, as measured by the validated PEMAT survey score mean and standard deviation from baseline compared to 6 and 12 weeks post baseline assessment. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) scale used for above outcome ranges from minimum of score 0 percent to maximum score of 100 percent. Higher values indicate better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom Assessment

    • Assessment of participant symptoms during cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment utilizing the MSAS. Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale used for above outcome ranges from minimum of score 0 to maximum score of 364. Higher values indicate presence of more and severe symptoms thus indicating worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Emotional Assessment

    • Assessment of participant emotions at the beginning and end of the study by comparing ETS scores. The Emotional Thermometer Scale used for above outcome ranges from minimum of score 0 to maximum score of 50. Higher values indicate presence of more and severe symptoms thus indicating worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Baseline Educational Assessment

    • Identification of participants with immediate family member (child, spouse, parent) who underwent cytotoxic chemotherapy and participant's education level through questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility Assessment

    • Measure of participant withdraw rate from study as a representation of feasibility.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Penn State Cancer Institute
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Information will be collected in De identified manner . IPD will not be shared with any other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04694794
Lead sponsor
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Responsible party
Monali Vasekar (Assistant Professor of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 5, 2021
Start date
Mar 24, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 19, 2023
Completion
Aug 21, 2023
Last update
Sep 1, 2023

Study contacts

Monali Vasekar, MD
principal investigator · Penn State Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion