CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04692415Updated Dec 31, 2020

Insulin Glargine U300 vs Insulin Degludec U100 in Impact on the Glycaemic and Cardiovascular Factors

A Phase 4 interventional study of Degludec and Glargine U300 in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by University of Split, School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Croatia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-31.

Sponsored by University of Split, School of Medicine · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2018, registered Dec 2020).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the impact of insulin degludec (IDeg-100) and insulin glargine U300 (IGlar-300) on cardiovascular risk parameters - glycaemic variability (GV), oxidative stress, arterial stiffness and lipid parameters - in insulin naive patients with DMT2.

Read the detailed description

We recruited a total of 25 patients (23 completed the study) with T2DM who had uncontrolled disease on two or more oral antidiabetic drugs. After the wash-up period, they were randomized alternately to first receive either IDeg-100 or IGlar-300 along with metformin. Each insulin was applied for 12 weeks. At the beginning and the end of each phase, biochemical and oxidative stress parameters were analysed and augmentation index was measured. On three consecutive days prior to each control point, patients performed a 7-point SMBG profile. Oxidative stress was assessed by measuring thiol groups and hydroperoxides (d-ROM) in serum. For augmentation index measuring, we used SphygmoCor (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) which allow non-invasive measurement of AIx on radial artery using strain gauge transducer placed on the tip of a pencil-type tonometer. This method is based on the principle of applanation tonometry

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • Diabetes mellitus type 2
  • degludec
  • glargine U300
  • glucose variability
  • lipids
  • arterial stiffness
  • oxidative stress
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Split, School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • a history of DMT2 for at least 1 year
  • aged between 18 and 65 years (women obligatory postmenopausal)
  • uncontrolled glycaemia on two or more oral antidiabetic drugs
  • no prior use of insulin
  • HbA1c ≥7.5%
  • receiving statins (if not on statins, they were put on it)
  • not on antiaggregant therapy (if on antiaggregants, they were temporarily excluded from therapy)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • the presence of malignant disease
  • chronic liver disease
  • renal impairment with creatinine clearance \< 60 ml/s
  • severe cardiovascular disease or history of cardiovascular incidents (stroke, myocardial infarction, peripheral amputation)
  • rheumatic and autoimmune diseases and the usage of glitazones or anticoagulant therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    degludec arm

    25 patients were discontinued their previous therapy and given metformin alone (2 g/day) for seven days. After seven days they were randomized to first receive IDeg-100 In phase one they received IDeg-100 and metformin for 12 weeks. Phase one was followed by a second wash-up period in which patients received metformin alone again for seven days. In phase two, which also lasted for 12 weeks, patients were switched from IDeg-100 to IGlar-300 (and metformin was continued). The initial dose of both insulins was 0.2 IU/kg.

    Drug: Degludec

  • Active comparator
    glargine arm

    25 patients were discontinued their previous therapy and given metformin alone (2 g/day) for seven days. After seven days they were randomized to first receive IGlar-300 In phase one they received IGlar-300 and metformin for 12 weeks. Phase one was followed by a second wash-up period in which patients received metformin alone again for seven days. In phase two, which also lasted for 12 weeks, patients were switched from IGlar-300 to IDeg-100 (and metformin was continued). The initial dose of both insulins was 0.2 IU/kg.

    Drug: Glargine U300

Interventions

  • DrugDegludec

    treatment of DM and it's affect on Glycaemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, Arterial Stiffness and the Lipid Profiles

  • DrugGlargine U300

    treatment of DM and it's affect on Glycaemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, Arterial Stiffness and the Lipid Profiles

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in glucose variability

    Glucose variability will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase using 3-day 7-point SMBG and calculating coefficient of variation in % out of SMBG recordings

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Changes from baseline in oxidative stress

    Oxidative stress will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by measuring thiol groups and hydroperoxides (d-ROM) in serum

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Changes from baseline in arterial stiffness after treatment

    Oxidative stress will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by measuring augmentation index with SphygmoCor.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in total cholesterol

    Total cholesterol concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Changes from baseline in triglycerides

    Triglyceride concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Changes from baseline in LDL

    Low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Changes from baseline in HDL

    High density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in mmol/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Changes from baseline in WBC

    White blood count will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Changes from baseline in RBC

    Red blood count will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Changes from baseline in platelets

    Platelets count will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Changes from baseline in hemoglobin

    Hemoglobin concentration in g/L will be assessed in at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Changes from baseline in hematocrit

    Hematocrit in L/L will be assessed in at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Changes from baseline in MCV

    Medium cellular volume in fL will be assessed in at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Changes from baseline in liver enzymes

    ALT, AST and GGT concentration in U/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Changes from baseline in LDH

    Lactate dehydrogenase concentration in U/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Changes from baseline in ALP

    Alkaline phosphatase concentration in U/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

  14. Changes from baseline in CRP

    C-reactive protein concentration in mg/L will be assessed at the beginning and the end of each phase by the automatic analyzer and enzymatic laboratory kit

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Klinički bolnički Centar Split
    Split, 21000, Croatia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405. PubMed 10938048 ↗
  • Eckel RH, Wassef M, Chait A, Sobel B, Barrett E, King G, Lopes-Virella M, Reusch J, Ruderman N, Steiner G, Vlassara H. Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Writing Group II: pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in diabetes. Circulation. 2002 May 7;105(18):e138-43. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000013954.65303.c5. No abstract available. PubMed 11994264 ↗
  • Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, Ihnat MA, Thorpe JE, Testa R, Boemi M, Giugliano D. Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2008 May;57(5):1349-54. doi: 10.2337/db08-0063. Epub 2008 Feb 25. PubMed 18299315 ↗
  • Monnier L, Colette C. Glycemic variability: should we and can we prevent it? Diabetes Care. 2008 Feb;31 Suppl 2:S150-4. doi: 10.2337/dc08-s241. PubMed 18227477 ↗
  • Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, Colette C. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1681-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1681. PubMed 16609090 ↗
  • Monnier L, Colette C, Owens DR. Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Nov;2(6):1094-100. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200618. PubMed 19885298 ↗
  • Patoulias D, Papadopoulos C, Stavropoulos K, Zografou I, Doumas M, Karagiannis A. Prognostic value of arterial stiffness measurements in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and its complications: The potential role of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Apr;22(4):562-571. doi: 10.1111/jch.13831. Epub 2020 Feb 14. PubMed 32058679 ↗
  • Vukovic J, Modun D, Budimir D, Sutlovic D, Salamunic I, Zaja I, Boban M. Acute, food-induced moderate elevation of plasma uric acid protects against hyperoxia-induced oxidative stress and increase in arterial stiffness in healthy humans. Atherosclerosis. 2009 Nov;207(1):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.04.012. Epub 2009 Apr 17. PubMed 19457484 ↗
  • Tamminen MK, Westerbacka J, Vehkavaara S, Yki-Jarvinen H. Insulin therapy improves insulin actions on glucose metabolism and aortic wave reflection in type 2 diabetic patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003 Oct;33(10):855-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01220.x. PubMed 14511356 ↗
  • Gordin D, Saraheimo M, Tuomikangas J, Soro-Paavonen A, Forsblom C, Paavonen K, Steckel-Hamann B, Harjutsalo V, Nicolaou L, Pavo I, Koivisto V, Groop PH. Insulin exposure mitigates the increase of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria: an exploratory analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2019 Nov;56(11):1169-1175. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01351-4. Epub 2019 May 22. PubMed 31119456 ↗
  • Aslan I, Kucuksayan E, Aslan M. Effect of insulin analog initiation therapy on LDL/HDL subfraction profile and HDL associated enzymes in type 2 diabetic patients. Lipids Health Dis. 2013 Apr 24;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-54. PubMed 23617853 ↗
  • Home P, Bartley P, Russell-Jones D, Hanaire-Broutin H, Heeg JE, Abrams P, Landin-Olsson M, Hylleberg B, Lang H, Draeger E; Study to Evaluate the Administration of Detemir Insulin Efficacy, Safety and Suitability (STEADINESS) Study Group. Insulin detemir offers improved glycemic control compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1081-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1081. PubMed 15111525 ↗
  • Heise T, Mathieu C. Impact of the mode of protraction of basal insulin therapies on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and resulting clinical outcomes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jan;19(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/dom.12782. Epub 2016 Sep 26. PubMed 27593206 ↗
  • Tibaldi J, Hadley-Brown M, Liebl A, Haldrup S, Sandberg V, Wolden ML, Rodbard HW. A comparative effectiveness study of degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):1001-1009. doi: 10.1111/dom.13616. Epub 2019 Jan 8. PubMed 30552800 ↗
  • Rosenstock J, Cheng A, Ritzel R, Bosnyak Z, Devisme C, Cali AMG, Sieber J, Stella P, Wang X, Frias JP, Roussel R, Bolli GB. More Similarities Than Differences Testing Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Insulin Degludec 100 Units/mL in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes: The Randomized Head-to-Head BRIGHT Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Oct;41(10):2147-2154. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0559. Epub 2018 Aug 13. PubMed 30104294 ↗
  • Vrebalov Cindro P, Krnic M, Modun D, Vukovic J, Ticinovic Kurir T, Kardum G, Rusic D, Seselja Perisin A, Bukic J. Comparison of the Impact of Insulin Degludec U100 and Insulin Glargine U300 on Glycemic Variability and Oxidative Stress in Insulin-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Pilot Study for a Randomized Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 8;6(7):e35655. doi: 10.2196/35655. PubMed 35802405 ↗
  • Cindro PV, Krnic M, Modun D, Smajic B, Vukovic J. The differences between insulin glargine U300 and insulin degludec U100 in impact on the glycaemic variability, arterial stiffness and the lipid profiles in insulin naive patients suffering from type two diabetes mellitus - outcomes from cross-over open-label randomized trial. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00746-1. PubMed 33926446 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — on request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 31, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04692415
Lead sponsor
University of Split, School of Medicine
Collaborators
Pavle Vrebalov Cindro, Jonatan Vuković, Darko Modun, Božo Smajić, Gordan Kardum, Tina Tičinović Kurir, Doris Rušić, Ana Šešelja Perišin, Josipa Bukić
Responsible party
Mladen Krnic (Assistant professor, University of Split, School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 31, 2020
Start date
Dec 15, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 27, 2019
Completion
Jun 27, 2019
Last update
Dec 31, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion