ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04692285Updated Dec 4, 2023

Electrophysiological and Neuroimaging Correlates of the Effect of Zolpidem in Patients With Focal Dystonia

A Phase 1 interventional study of Zolpidem and Placebo in Focal Dystonia, sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-04.

Sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2017, registered Dec 2020).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To study electrophysiological and imaging correlations of the clinical effectiveness of zolpidem in task-specific dystonia and to elucidate mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects, patients with focal dystonia will be clinically evaluated and will undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation and FDG-PET CT brain imaging after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo, in two separate sessions. Resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), resting and active input/output (IO) curve, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) curve, long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and cortical silent period (CSP) will be measured. Objective clinical improvement will be rated using Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-movement (BFM-M) and writer's cramp rating scale (WCRS). Subjective improvement will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Only a subset of patients (10 patients) will undergo positron emission tomography with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG PET) brain imaging after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo.

Read the detailed description

Background: The present view of dystonia is as of a circuit disorder, involving basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways. One of the key pathophysiological features of dystonia is decreased inhibition at several levels of the central nervous system. The lack of inhibition may account for many of the dystonic symptoms, such as co-contraction of antagonistic muscles, loss of selectivity in muscle activation during movement, or overflow of dystonic symptoms in body parts not engaged in the movement. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). Studies in animal models, as well as neuroimaging and electrophysiological data on dystonic patients, provide evidence of abnormal GABA neurotransmission in dystonia. Currently, there is no cure for dystonia, but there are several symptomatic treatment options, including medications and surgical approaches. While only a minority of dystonia patients is eligible for deep brain stimulation most affected individuals are dependent on pharmacological treatments for symptomatic relief. These include botulinum toxin injections and oral medications. Botulinum toxin injection treatment is effective in focal and segmental dystonia, but it requires repeated injections, may be associated with resistance to treatment, and is expensive. Available oral medications are however not very effective (particularly in adult dystonia patients) and may be associated with intolerable adverse effects. Consequently, research into the use of new pharmaceuticals approaches is warranted. Zolpidem is a widely used hypnotic agent that potentiates GABA transmission, as a selective agonist of the benzodiazepine subtype receptor α1. Zolpidem has been recently reported in an open-labeled study to be effective in primary focal and generalized dystonia, with the effect being variable among different dystonia patients.

Aims: To study electrophysiological correlations of the clinical effectiveness of zolpidem in task-specific dystonia and to elucidate mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects, which have not yet been investigated.

Hypotheses: Taking into account reports in the literature, we believe we will be able to prove zolpidem is more effective in improving focal dystonia than placebo. Since zolpidem acts as an agonist in GABA-A receptors, we believe it will enhance TMS measures that are known to be mediated true GABA-A signaling. We hypothesize that the effects of zolpidem on electrophysiological measures will correlate with the patient's response to treatment.

Patients and inclusion/exclusion criteria: Thirty patients with writer's cramp or musician dystonia will be recruited from the outpatient clinic for extrapyramidal disorders. Patients treated with botulinum toxin within the last 3 months and patients with contraindications for TMS will be excluded. Patients will not be allowed to take benzodiazepines, zolpidem, or other sedative drugs for 48 hours prior to the experiment. No changes in medications before and during the whole study apart from study-related drug intervention will be allowed.

Study protocol: 30 patients will undergo TMS after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo, in two separate sessions. Objective clinical improvement will be rated using Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-movement (BFM-M) and writer's cramp rating scale (WCRS). Subjective improvement will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, 10 patients will undergo positron emission tomography with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG PET) brain imaging after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo.

Methods:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) Single TMS pulses will be applied using Magstim 2002 magnetic stimulator with monophasic waveform (Magstim Company, Carmarthenshire, Wales, UK). For double TMS pulses, we will use two Magstim 2002 stimulators connected with the Bistim module. The stimulators will be connected to a standard figure 8 coil. The coil will be positioned tangentially to the skull and over the 'hotspot' point on the scalp, with the handle pointing backward at an angle of \~ 45 ° with respect to the sagittal plane. Hotspot point is defined as stimulation site resulting in the largest motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded over the contralateral abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. A hotspot point will be found by visual inspection. The MEP amplitude in APB muscle will be measured with electromyography (EMG).

Statistical analysis: Clinical and TMS measures on zolpidem and placebo will be compared using parametric or nonparametric T-test or repeated-measures ANOVA. Correlations will be tested using Spearman analysis. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM8; paired t-test, p\<0.001) will be used to identify the zolpidem effect on global brain metabolism.

02

Conditions studied

  • Focal Dystonia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • writer's cram
  • musician dystonia
  • TMS
  • zolpidem
03

In context

Dystonic Disorders

239 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystonic Disorders; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 28 across 143 interventional studies indexed under Dystonic Disorders.

Browse Dystonic Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 293 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of writer's cramp or musician dystonia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with botulinum toxin within the last 3 months
  • Patients with contraindications for TMS
  • Patients taking benzodiazepines, zolpidem or other sedative drugs 48 hours prior to the experiment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Patients with focal dystonia treatment first placebo second

    Zolpidem 5 mg single dose

    Drug: Zolpidem

  • Placebo comparator
    Patients with focal dystonia placebo first treatment second

    Placebo 5 mg single dose

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Patients will undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation, 18F-FDG-PET brain imaging, and clinical testing after a single 5 mg dose of Zolpidem.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Patients will undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation, 18F-FDG-PET brain imaging, and clinical testing after a single dose of placebo.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the transcranial magnetic stimulation measures between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation measures (resting and active cortical motor threshold, resting and active input-output curve, short intracortical inhibition, long intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation) after zolpidem 5 mg and placebo will be compared.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

  2. Change in brain metabolism detected on FDG-PET CT brain imaging between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    FDG-PET CT brain imaging

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMS) between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    Dystonia can be objectively assessed using the BFMS. The BFMS is subdivided into a movement scale and a disability scale. Only the movement scale will be used. The minimum total score is 0, the maximal total score is 120. Patients who are more affected with dystonia get higher scores.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Change in The Writer's Cramp Rating Scale (WCRS) between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    The writer's cramp dystonia can be objectively assessed using WCRS. The minimum score on WCRS is 0 and the maximum score is 30. The WCRS consists of two subscores, the writing movement score with the minimum score 0 and the maximum score 28 and the writing speed score with the minimum score 0 and the maximum score 2. The higher the score, the more is a patient affected with the writer's cramp dystonia.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

  2. Change in the Visual Analog Score between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    To subjectively assess dystonia, the Visual Analog Scale will be used. The minimum score on the scale will be 0 and the maximum score will be 10. A higher score will mean a greater impairment due to the presence of dystonia.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University Clinical Centre of Serbia
    Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
  • Departmet of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lehericy S, Tijssen MA, Vidailhet M, Kaji R, Meunier S. The anatomical basis of dystonia: current view using neuroimaging. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):944-57. doi: 10.1002/mds.25527. PubMed 23893451 ↗
  • Kapogiannis D, Wassermann EM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in Clinical Pharmacology. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2008 Dec;8(4):234-240. doi: 10.2174/187152408786848076. PubMed 19122782 ↗
  • Quartarone A, Hallett M. Emerging concepts in the physiological basis of dystonia. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):958-67. doi: 10.1002/mds.25532. PubMed 23893452 ↗
  • Thenganatt MA, Jankovic J. Treatment of dystonia. Neurotherapeutics. 2014 Jan;11(1):139-52. doi: 10.1007/s13311-013-0231-4. PubMed 24142590 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — If I will be contacted by other researchers after publication I will share individual participant data that will underlie published results.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 43 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 23, 2020
First posted
Dec 31, 2020
StartActual
Sep 30, 2017
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
Dec 4, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 4, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04692285
Collaborators
Slovenian Research Agency, Clinical Centre of Serbia
Responsible party
Maja Kojović (doc. dr. Maja Kojović, dr. med., University Medical Centre Ljubljana) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 31, 2020
Start date
Sep 30, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2021
Completion
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
Dec 4, 2023

Study contacts

Maja Kojović, PhD, MD
principal investigator · University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Zolpidem

Start the discussion