CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04687839Updated Mar 19, 2021

Assessment of the Wound Healing Efficacy and Tolerance of a Medical Device on Wounds in Healthy Subjects.

An interventional study of Induction of suction blister and Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in Healthy, sponsored by Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-19.

Sponsored by Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The tested medical device is indicated for the treatment of wounds and small skin injuries. The intention of this study is to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of the test product by measuring the recovery of the skin barrier after wound produced by suction blister. But also, by validating the accompanying physiological effect of the study product during this recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • Heaklthy adult subject
  • Wound
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject with a phototype I, II or III according to the Fitzpatrick scale
  • Subject aged between 18 and 45 years included at selection visit
  • Subject with absence of infectious diseases (HIV and Hepatitis), confirmed by negative blood test results

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of keloids and hypertrophic scars
  • Subject with removal of axillary lymph nodes
  • Pathology, active skin disease or dermatological condition in progress (psoriasis and/or lichen ruber and/or eczema ...) or presence of dermatological lesions on the inner side of the forearm (solar erythema or dermatosis ...) that may affect the performance of the research or judged incompatible with the realization of the study
  • Subject with severe illness (severe infectious disease (e.g. severe flu)), chronic disease or acute evolutionary pathology likely to influence the study results or considered by the investigator hazardous for the subject or incompatible with the study
  • Knowledge of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome or Infectious (acute) Hepatitis
  • Subject presenting a healing pathology or a pathology with consequences on the healing like the diabetes mellitus (type I and type II)
  • Subject with congenital methemoglobinemia or porphyria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Healthy adult subjects

    It's a randomized intra-individual comparative study with two injured study areas (treated and untreated) for each subject. The randomization will determine the application side on which the tested product will be applied (RIGHT or LEFT forearm). Twice daily application on the treated area.

    Procedure: Induction of suction blister · Other: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) · Other: Macrophotography · Device: Wound healing medical device

Interventions

  • ProcedureInduction of suction blister

    For each subject, 2 superficial wounds will be made on the inner aspect of each forearm using the suction blister model.

  • OtherTransepidermal water loss (TEWL)

    * At V1, before blister suction use (T0) and after blister withdrawal before product application (T1) * For subsequent visits, before product application

  • OtherMacrophotography

    * At V1, before blister suction use (T0) and after blister withdrawal before product application (T1) * For subsequent visits, before product application

  • DeviceWound healing medical device

    Twice daily application on superficial wounds

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of the tested product on the wound healing at D6

    By measuring the wound surface (measured by macro-photos) on treated area compared to an untreated area

    Time frame: Day6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of the tested product on the cutaneous barrier restoration

    By measuring the TEWL (Trans Epidermal Water Loss) on treated area compared to an untreated area

    Time frame: Day1, Day2, Day4, Day6, Day8(+/-1), Day10(+/-1) and Day13(+/-1)

  2. Effect of the tested product on healing

    By measuring the wound surface (measured by macro-photos) on treated area compared to an untreated area

    Time frame: Day1, Day2, Day4, Day6, Day8(+/-1), Day10(+/-1) and Day13(+/-1)

  3. Tolerance of the tested product

    By measuring the occurence of adverse event

    Time frame: Day1, Day2, Day4, Day6, Day8(+/-1), Day10(+/-1) and Day13(+/-1)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dr. Kirstin Deuble-Bente
    Schenefeld, 22869, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04687839
Lead sponsor
Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 29, 2020
Start date
Jul 13, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 17, 2020
Completion
Aug 17, 2020
Last update
Mar 19, 2021

Study contacts

Kirstin Deuble-Bente, Dr.
principal investigator · Kiebitzweg 2, 22869 Schenefeld/Hamburg, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion