CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04685902Updated Mar 7, 2022

Assessing Upper Airway Patency in Tracheostomy Patients During One Way Speaking Valve Trial

An observational study in Tracheostomy Complication, sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-07.

Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Staffing issues
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Approximately 24% of ICU patients require the use of a tracheostomy, which impacts vocalization. A one-way speaking valve (SV) can be used to restore vocalization for this patient population. However, if a patient has an obstructed upper airway, SV placement has potential to pose a risk as it might cause asphyxia or even cardiac arrest within minutes, due to the sudden increased intra-thoracic pressure and decreased venous return. Therefore, upper airway patency is crucial in the patient's tolerability and safety to use SV. However, little is available to assess patient's upper airway patency before SV placement. Currently, the predominate way to evaluate readiness is the clinician's subjective assessment based on the quality of vocalization, perceived comfort, and tolerance following SV placement. In the previous in vitro study, the upper airway patency was strongly correlated with the trans-tracheal pressure and the inspiratory flow from upper airway during SV trial. Thus this clinical prospective observational study is aimed to validate the two methods with upper airway patency, which will be validated by bedside ultrasound examination as well.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tracheostomy Complication

Keywords

  • Tracheostomy
  • Upper airway patency
  • speaking valve
  • Ultrasound
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 394 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients who currently have a tracheostomy and receive an order for one-way speaking valve trial will be recruited from Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years and older
  • Current RUMC patient
  • An order for a one-way speaking valve trial
  • Tracheostomy
  • PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O and FIO2 ≤ 50%
  • English speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Laryngectomy
  • Uncorrected anatomical anomalies
  • Unable to communicate
  • Hemodynamically unstable
  • Refuse to participate in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Adult patients with tracheostomy

    Adult patients who currently have a tracheostomy and receive an order for one-way speaking valve trial

    Device: One-way speaking valve

Interventions

  • DeviceOne-way speaking valve

    One-way speaking valve is a small device that attaches to the tracheostomy tube, to allows tracheostomy patient to breathe in through his or her trach tube. After the inhalation, the speaking valve closes. Air is breathed out (exhaled) up through the vocal cords, then through the mouth and nose.

    Also known as: Passy muir valve

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inspiratory flow from upper airway

    Inspiratory flow from upper airway during one-way speaking valve trial

    Time frame: within 1 minute of measuring patient's inspiratory flow

  2. Tidal volume from upper airway

    Tidal volume from upper airway during one-way speaking valve trial

    Time frame: within 1 minute of measuring patient's tidal volume

  3. Tran-tracheal pressure (TTP)

    Tran-tracheal pressure (TTP) during one-way speaking valve trial

    Time frame: within 15 seconds of measuring TTP

  4. leak volume [for mechanically ventilated patients only]

    volume leaked from upper airway during invasive ventilation

    Time frame: within 1 minute of measuring patient's leak volume

  5. Ultrasound results for upper-airway

    Ultrasound results include pre-epiglottic space distance/epiglottitis to middle distance of vocal cords (Pre-E/E-VC), thyrohyoid membrane (DSEM), and hyomental distance ratio (HMDR)

    Time frame: within 10 minutes of the ultrasound examination

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heart rate during one-way speaking valve trial

    Heart rate during one-way speaking valve trial

    Time frame: within 15 minutes of placing one-way speaking valve

  2. Respiratory rate during one-way speaking valve trial

    Respiratory rate during one-way speaking valve trial

    Time frame: within 15 minutes of placing one-way speaking valve

  3. SpO2 during one-way speaking valve trial

    SpO2 during one-way speaking valve trial

    Time frame: within 15 minutes of placing one-way speaking valve

  4. Blood pressure during one-way speaking valve trial

    Blood pressure during one-way speaking valve trial

    Time frame: within 15 minutes of placing one-way speaking valve

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cheung NH, Napolitano LM. Tracheostomy: epidemiology, indications, timing, technique, and outcomes. Respir Care. 2014 Jun;59(6):895-915; discussion 916-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02971. PubMed 24891198 ↗
  • Johnson DC, Campbell SL, Rabkin JD. Tracheostomy tube manometry: evaluation of speaking valves, capping and need for downsizing. Clin Respir J. 2009 Jan;3(1):8-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2008.00100.x. PubMed 20298366 ↗
  • Singh RK, Saran S, Baronia AK. The practice of tracheostomy decannulation-a systematic review. J Intensive Care. 2017 Jun 20;5:38. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0234-z. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28649385 ↗
  • Falcetta S, Cavallo S, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Sorbello M, Zdravkovic I, Donati A. Evaluation of two neck ultrasound measurements as predictors of difficult direct laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):605-612. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000832. PubMed 29889671 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to HIPAA, we would not share the individual participant data

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04685902
Lead sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Responsible party
Jie Li (Associate professor, Rush University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 28, 2020
Start date
Jun 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 7, 2022

Study contacts

Jie Li, PhD
principal investigator · Rush University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion