ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04678856Liberty CRSsNPUpdated Jul 30, 2026Results posted

Dupilumab in CRSsNP

A Phase 2 interventional study of Dupilumab SAR231893 and Placebo in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps, Sinusitis and Chronic Sinusitis, sponsored by Sanofi. Completed at 58 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
71
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on computerized tomography (CT) scan in the dupilumab group only

Secondary Objectives:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on CT scan and sinus total symptom score (sTSS) compared to placebo
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo
  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo
  • Assessment of immunogenicity to dupilumab over time compared to placebo
Read the detailed description

The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period, 24-52 weeks randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
  • Sinusitis
  • Chronic Sinusitis
  • Sinus Disorder
  • Respiratory Disorder
03

In context

Sinusitis

256 studies on the registry are indexed under Sinusitis; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 71 is above the median of 60 across 196 interventional studies indexed under Sinusitis.

Browse Sinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,557 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Of its 205 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 123 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the form (ICF).
  • Participants must have bilateral inflammation of paranasal sinuses in CT scan with LMK ≥8 and bilateral ethmoid opacification before randomization.
  • Participants must have ongoing symptoms of loss of smell and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior) of any severity, with or without facial pain/pressure for at least 12 consecutive weeks by Visit 1.
  • Participants must have ongoing symptoms of nasal congestion (NC)/obstruction at least 12 consecutive weeks before Visit 1 and a NC score of ≥ 2 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
  • Participants must have sTSS (NC, rhinorrhea, facial pain/pressure) ≥5 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
  • Participants must have one of the 2 following features:

    • Prior sinonasal surgery (see note at end of section 5.2 for definitions of sinonasal surgery) for CRS,
    • Treatment with systemic (SCS) therapy for CRS as defined by any dose and duration within the prior 2 years before screening (Visit 1) or intolerance/ to SCS.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with nasal conditions/concomitant nasal diseases such as nasal polyposis in endoscopy at Visit 1 or with history of nasal polyposis etc., making them non-evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy
  • Nasal cavity malignant tumor and benign tumors.
  • (FEV1) ≤50% of predicted normal at Visit 1.
  • Radiologic suspicion or confirmed invasive or expansive fungal rhinosinusitis.
  • Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect participation in the study
  • Active tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis unless documented adequately treated.
  • Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections; suspected or high risk of endoparasitic infection
  • Known or suspected immunodeficiency
  • History of within 5 years before Visit 1, except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, and completely treated and resolved nonmetastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the Screening Visit 1 or during the screening period.
  • History of systemic or anaphylaxis to dupilumab or any of its .
  • Participants in prior dupilumab clinical trial or have been treated with commercially available dupilumab within 12 months or who discontinued dupilumab use due to adverse event.
  • Participants who are treated with intranasal drops; intranasal steroid emitting devices/stents; nasal spray using exhalation delivery system, such as Xhance™, during screening period.
  • Participants on unstable dose of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) spray 4 weeks prior to Screening Visit (Visit1) and during screening period.
  • Participants who have undergone sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Participants who have taken:

    • Biologic therapy/systemic to treat inflammatory disease or disease within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
    • Any mAb within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
    • Anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab) within 4 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • Leukotriene antagonists/modifiers unless participant is on a continuous treatment for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1.
  • Initiation of allergen immunotherapy within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or a plan to begin therapy or change its dose during the screening or treatment period.
  • Participants received SCS during screening period (between Visit 1 and Visit 2).
  • Either intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and/or plasmapheresis within 30 days prior to Screening Visit (Visit 1).

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
71 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part A and B: Dupilumab

    Participants received dupilumab 300 milligrams (mg) via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks.

    Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893

  • Placebo comparator
    Part A and B: Matching placebo

    Participants received matching placebo via SC injection q2w for up to 53.2 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous

  • DrugPlacebo

    Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group

    The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score

    The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS)

    The sTSS is a composite score derived from the following individual items: nasal congestion (NC), anterior/posterior rhinorrhea, and facial pain/pressure. Each of the individual items were scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 and consists of the sum of NC, the averaged rhinorrhea item scores, and facial pain/pressure scores. Higher scores on sTSS indicated greater overall symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days

  4. Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to evaluate serum concentration of dupilumab.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52

  5. Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Dupilumab and Positive Neutralizing Antibody (Nab)

    Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Pre-existing immunoreactivity was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay at baseline with all post first dose ADA results negative, OR an ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than 4-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-boosted response was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that was greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results were positive. Samples positive in the ADA assay were further characterized for the presence of NAbs.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

07

Results

Posted Dec 18, 2024

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 57 centers in 13 countries. A total of 269 participants were screened between 02 December 2020 to 26 April 2023, of which 198 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting the eligibility criteria.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Started3338
Completed2537
Not completed81
Withdrew: Not related to coronavirus disease-2019 (covid-19)30
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject51

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group

The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group
Score on a scaleDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group-6.63 ± 3.91
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score

The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score
Score on a scalePlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score-0.68 ± 2.26-6.63 ± 3.91
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS)

The sTSS is a composite score derived from the following individual items: nasal congestion (NC), anterior/posterior rhinorrhea, and facial pain/pressure. Each of the individual items were scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 and consists of the sum of NC, the averaged rhinorrhea item scores, and facial pain/pressure scores. Higher scores on sTSS indicated greater overall symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS)
Score on a scalePlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS)-1.75 ± 2.19-3.18 ± 2.68
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
ParticipantsPlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2w
TEAEs2729
TESAEs63
TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation01
SecondarySerum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to evaluate serum concentration of dupilumab.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · Nanograms per milliliter
Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time
Nanograms per milliliterDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Baseline0.00 ± 0.00
Week 1254733.20 ± 26222.53
Week 2462192.86 ± 23979.23
Week 5268365.00 ± 30613.86
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Dupilumab and Positive Neutralizing Antibody (Nab)

Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Pre-existing immunoreactivity was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay at baseline with all post first dose ADA results negative, OR an ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than 4-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-boosted response was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that was greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results were positive. Samples positive in the ADA assay were further characterized for the presence of NAbs.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Dupilumab and Positive Neutralizing Antibody (Nab)
ParticipantsPlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Pre-existing immunoreactivity10
Treatment-emergent ADA response11
Treatment-boosted ADA response10
Positive Nab31

Adverse events

Collected over TEAEs and TESAEs were collected from the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days. All-cause mortality (deaths) were collected from participant's screening (Day -28) to the end of follow-up for each participant, up to 476 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/33 (0%)6/33 (18.2%)12/33 (36.4%)
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0/38 (0%)3/38 (7.9%)20/38 (52.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Chronic SinusitisInfections and infestations1/330/38
Foot DeformityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/330/38
Spinal OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/330/38
Diabetic NeuropathyNervous system disorders1/330/38
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/330/38
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/330/38
Peripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseVascular disorders1/330/38
Myocardial BridgingCongenital, familial and genetic disorders0/331/38
Chronic GastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/331/38
BilomaHepatobiliary disorders0/331/38
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2w
Covid-19Infections and infestations7/338/38
Injection Site ErythemaGeneral disorders1/334/38
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations3/330/38
Accidental OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/332/38
Injection Site ReactionGeneral disorders1/333/38
Injection Site SwellingGeneral disorders2/330/38
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/332/38
Viral Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations2/332/38
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/331/38
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/332/38

Baseline characteristics

Randomized population included all participants with a treatment kit number allocated and recorded in the interactive response technology (IRT) database, and regardless of whether the treatment kit was used or not.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)PlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2wTotal
Mean47.45 ± 17.4646.45 ± 12.6046.92 ± 14.95
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2wTotal
Female162541
Male171330
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2wTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian358
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White303161
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported011
Lund-Mackay (LMK) Score
Lund-Mackay (LMK) Score(Score on a scale)PlaceboDupilumab 300 mg q2wTotal
Mean11.50 ± 3.1911.41 ± 3.6911.45 ± 3.44
08

Study locations

58 sites
  • Sacramento Ear, Nose & Throat Site Number : 8400010
    Roseville, California 95661, United States
  • Bensch Clinical Research LLC Site Number : 8400015
    Stockton, California 95207, United States
  • Colorado Allergy and Asthma Centers, PC Site Number : 8400003
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • University of Missouri Health System Site Number : 8400016
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
  • Nebraska Medical Research Institute Site Number : 8400007
    Papillion, Nebraska 68046, United States
  • Optimed Research, LTD Site Number : 8400017
    Columbus, Ohio 43235, United States
  • Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, P.C. Site Number : 8400004
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • Essential Medical Research, LLC Site Number : 8400014
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74137, United States
  • Pharmaceutical Research & Consulting, Inc. Site Number : 8400006
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Alamo ENT Associates Site Number : 8400021
    San Antonio, Texas 78258, United States
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) Medical Group - Otola Site Number : 8400009
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320002
    Buenos Aires, C1121ABE, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320003
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1414AIF, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320001
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425BEN, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0560002
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number : 0560001
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240013
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240010
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240007
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240016
    London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240001
    Montreal, Quebec H2X 3E4, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240012
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240002
    Trois-Rivières, Quebec G8T 7A1, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240005
    Québec, G1V 4G5, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240003
    Québec, G1V 4W2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1520001
    Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago 8207257, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560001
    Beijing, 100730, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560005
    Changchun, 130021, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560013
    Changsha, 410013, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560010
    Chongqing, 400016, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560006
    Shanghai, 200065, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560008
    Yantai, 264000, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 3480004
    Budapest, 1115, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number : 3480001
    Pécs, 7621, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number : 6200002
    Aveiro, 3810-501, Portugal
  • Investigational Site Number : 6200001
    Guimarães, 4810-061, Portugal
  • Investigational Site Number : 6200003
    Matosinhos Municipality, 4464-513, Portugal
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430005
    Moscow, 121359, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430002
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430003
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430001
    Stavropol, 355020, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100003
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 07061, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100002
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 135-710, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240002
    Seville, Andalusia 41009, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240001
    Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona] 08036, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240007
    Santander, Cantabria 39008, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240004
    Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz 11407, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240009
    Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de 28027, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240005
    Madrid / Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de 28040, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240008
    Pamplona, Navarre 31008, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240010
    Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7520001
    Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
  • Investigational Site Number : 8040005
    Dnipro, 49006, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number : 8040001
    Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number : 8040004
    Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number : 8040008
    Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number : 8040002
    Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number : 8040007
    Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2020 to primary completion in Nov 2023, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2024, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 16, 2020
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
StartActual
Dec 2, 2020
Primary completionActual
Nov 14, 2023
CompletionActual
Jan 29, 2024
Results first posted
Dec 18, 2024
Last update
Jul 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04678856
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
Start date
Dec 2, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 14, 2023
Completion
Jan 29, 2024
Results posted
Dec 18, 2024
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dupilumab

Start the discussion