ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04678531Updated Dec 22, 2020

TTO Swabs Versus Baby Shampoo in Patients With Seborrehic Blepharitis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Swabs containing tea tree oil and chamomile oil and Baby shampoo in Seborrheic Blepharitis, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-22.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2018, registered Dec 2020).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of lid swabs containing tea tree oil (TTO) and chamomile oil and baby shampoo (BS) in the treatment of seborrheic blepharitis.

Read the detailed description

After being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written consent will have a complete ophthalmological examination to determine eligibilty for study entry. At week 0, patients who meet the eligibility requirements will be randomized in a double blind manner (participant and investigator) in a 1:1 ratio using block randomization to lid wipes containing tea tree oil (TTO) and chamomile oil or baby shampoo (twice daily).

02

Conditions studied

  • Seborrheic Blepharitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • seborrheic blepharitis
  • tea tree oil
  • baby shampoo
  • swabs
  • chamomile oil
03

In context

Blepharitis

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Blepharitis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is below the median of 60 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Blepharitis.

Browse Blepharitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 699 studies on the registry; 213 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of seborrheic blepharitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ophthalmological pathologies that may affect the tear film functions including ocular rosacea, contact lens use, history of any ocular surgery, or patients with systemic pathologies or those using systemic medications that may affect the tear film functions
  • Patients younger than 18-year-old
  • Patients who used any treatment for blepharitis within the 6 months prior to the examination
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Swabs containing tea tree oil and chamomile oil

    The swabs will be applied on the eyelids twice a day for 8 weeks followed by a discontinuation period of 4 weeks.

    Drug: Swabs containing tea tree oil and chamomile oil

  • Active comparator
    Baby shampoo

    Baby shampoo will be applied on the eyelids twice a day for 8 weeks followed by a discontinuation period of 4 weeks

    Drug: Baby shampoo

Interventions

  • DrugSwabs containing tea tree oil and chamomile oil

    Swabs will be used in 26 patients for 8 weeks and will be discontinued in the following 4 weeks.

  • DrugBaby shampoo

    Baby shampoo will be used in 23 patients for 8 weeks and will be discontinued in the following 4 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in Blepharitis Symptom measure (BLISS) score

    BLISS score is calculated according to the answers given to the questionnaire. Higher BLISS scores is related to a worse outcome. (Range is between 0 and 39)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks

  2. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in Blepharitis Symptom measure (BLISS) score

    BLISS score is calculated according to the answers given to the questionnaire. Higher BLISS scores is related to a worse outcome. (Range is between 0 and 39)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks

  3. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in Blepharitis Symptom measure (BLISS) score

    BLISS score is calculated according to the answers given to the questionnaire. Higher BLISS scores is related to a worse outcome. (Range is between 0 and 39)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in Demodex mite count by light microscopy

    The number of mites in the epilated 4 eyelashes will be counted under microscope.

    Time frame: 0-4-8-12 weeks

  2. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in the Schirmer's test results

    Dry eye evaluation will be made with Schirmer's test.

    Time frame: 0-4-8-12 weeks

  3. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in the tear breakup time

    Dry eye evaluation will be made with tear breakup time.

    Time frame: 0-4-8-12 weeks

  4. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in the ocular surface disease index score

    OSDI scores are calculated according to the responses to the questionnaire. Higher values are related to a worse outcome (range is between 0-100).

    Time frame: 0-4-8-12 weeks

  5. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in the non-invasive tear breakup time

    Dry eye evaluation will be made with non-invasive tear breakup time.

    Time frame: 0-4-8-12 weeks

  6. Efficacy of the treatment assessed by the change in the meibomian gland loss

    Meibomian gland loss will be evaluated using anterior segment analysis system.

    Time frame: 0-4-8-12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
    Istanbul, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2019, 12 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 17, 2020
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
StartActual
Nov 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 15, 2019
CompletionActual
Nov 15, 2019
Last update
Dec 22, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04678531
Collaborators
Koç University
Responsible party
Ceyhun Arici, MD (Associate Professor, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
Start date
Nov 12, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2019
Completion
Nov 15, 2019
Last update
Dec 22, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion