CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04676022SOLISUpdated Mar 6, 2025Results posted

SCS as an Option for Chronic Low Back and/or Leg Pain Instead of Surgery

An interventional study of WaveWriter and Conventional Medical Managament in Chronic Pain, sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation. Completed at 23 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-06.

Sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
241
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) with multiple modalities compared to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain who have not undergone spinal surgery when using the Boston Scientific WaveWriter SCS Systems.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,928 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 699 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 241 is above the median of 60 across 2,160 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation is the lead sponsor of 517 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 64 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic low back pain, with or without leg pain, for at least 6 months
  • Received at least 90 days of documented pain management care to address the primary pain complaint, prior to Screening (e.g. medication, physical therapy)
  • If female of childbearing potential: not pregnant, as evidenced by a negative pregnancy test at Screening
  • Subject signed a valid, IRB-approved informed consent form (ICF) provided in English

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary pain complaint of vascular origin (e.g. peripheral vascular disease)
  • Require implantation of lead(s) in the cervical epidural space
  • Significant cognitive impairment at Screening that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would reasonably be expected to impair the study candidate's ability to assess pain intensity
  • Previous failed spinal cord stimulation trial or is already implanted with an active implantable device(s) (e.g. pacemaker, drug pump, implantable pulse generator)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
241 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Spinal Cord Stimulation

    To receive Spinal Cord Stimulation programming

    Device: WaveWriter

  • Other
    Conventional Medical Management

    To receive conventional medical management

    Other: Conventional Medical Managament

Interventions

  • DeviceWaveWriter

    To receive Spinal Cord Stimulation programming

  • OtherConventional Medical Managament

    To receive conventional medical management

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Responder Rate

    Proportion of subjects with 50% or greater reduction in overall pain relief

    Time frame: 3 months post-activation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index)

    Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated questionnaire of pain-related disability with total score on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability). Categories for ODI total score are 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The published minimally clinically important difference for change in ODI is 10 points.

    Time frame: 3-Months post activation

07

Results

Posted May 8, 2024

Participant flow

241 subjects provided informed consent.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSpinal Cord StimulationConventional Medical ManagementNon-randomized Subjects
Started796894
Completed57640
Not completed22494
Withdrew: Screen failure/1185
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up110
Withdrew: Adverse event201
Withdrew: Physician decision201
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject316
Withdrew: Will not move forward with permanent implant600
Withdrew: Various reasons (moved, no longer meets criteria, visit not done etc.)711

Outcome measures

PrimaryResponder Rate

Proportion of subjects with 50% or greater reduction in overall pain relief

Time frame:
3 months post-activation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Responder Rate
ParticipantsSpinal Cord StimulationConventional Medical Management
Responder Rate515
SecondaryChange in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index)

Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated questionnaire of pain-related disability with total score on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability). Categories for ODI total score are 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The published minimally clinically important difference for change in ODI is 10 points.

Time frame:
3-Months post activation
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index)
score on a scaleSpinal Cord StimulationConventional Medical Management
Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index)-27.5 ± 15.9-7.2 ± 9.9

Adverse events

Collected over Randomized subjects through 3-Months post-Activation, an average of 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Randomized to SCS0/79 (0%)8/79 (10.1%)9/79 (11.4%)
Randomized to CMM1/68 (1.5%)1/68 (1.5%)4/68 (5.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRandomized to SCSRandomized to CMM
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations0/791/68
Hiatus herniaGastrointestinal disorders1/790/68
Oesophageal food impactionGastrointestinal disorders1/790/68
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/790/68
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/790/68
Renal MassRenal and urinary disorders1/790/68
Alcohol Use DisorderPsychiatric disorders1/790/68
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders1/790/68
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/790/68
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRandomized to SCSRandomized to CMM
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/794/68
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/790/68
Dermatitis contactSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/790/68

Baseline characteristics

All Randomized subjects

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
Mean57.3 ± 12.1061.0 ± 11.959.0 ± 12.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
Female554398
Male242549
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
Race and Ethnicity : American Indian or Alaska native011
Race and Ethnicity : Black, of African heritage639
Race and Ethnicity : Caucasian7262134
Race and Ethnicity : Not disclosed101
Race and Ethnicity : Hispanic or Latino033
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
United States7968147
Duration of Low Back Pain
Duration of Low Back Pain(years)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
Mean11.5 ± 10.412.9 ± 11.512.2 ± 10.9
Average low back pain (VRS)
Average low back pain (VRS)(units on a scale)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
Mean7.5 ± 1.07.6 ± 0.97.6 ± 0.9
Average overall pain (VRS)
Average overall pain (VRS)(units on a scale)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
Mean7.5 ± 0.97.5 ± 1.07.5 ± 0.9
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Summary Score
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Summary Score(units on a scale)Randomized to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Treatment ActivatedRandomized to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) Treatment ActivatedTotal
Mean54.4 ± 8.554.4 ± 9.454.4 ± 8.9
08

Study locations

23 sites
  • Vitamed Research
    Palm Desert, California 92260, United States
  • Summit Pain Alliance
    Santa Rosa, California 95401, United States
  • Denver Back Pain Specialists
    Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111, United States
  • South Lake Pain Institute, Inc
    Clermont, Florida 34711, United States
  • University of Chicago Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine
    Carmel, Indiana 46032, United States
  • Crimson Pain Management
    Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
  • MedPharmics, LLC
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Willis-Knighton River Cities Clinical Research Center
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71105, United States
  • Forest Health Medical Center
    Ypsilanti, Michigan 48198, United States
  • Saint Louis Pain Consultants
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical University
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • Carolinas Research Institute, PLLC
    Huntersville, North Carolina 28078, United States
  • Novant Health-Hawthorne
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • The Center for Clinical Research
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • The Toledo Clinic
    Toledo, Ohio 43623, United States
  • Pacific Sports and Spine, LLC
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • Delaware Valley Pain and Spine Institute
    Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053, United States
  • PCPMG Clinical Research Unit, LLC
    Greenville, South Carolina 29601, United States
  • Institute of Precision Pain Medicine
    Corpus Christi, Texas 78414, United States
  • Precision Spine Care
    Tyler, Texas 75701, United States
  • University of Utah Orthopaedic Center
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2. PubMed 34854473 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 5, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04676022
Lead sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2020
Start date
Mar 26, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 25, 2022
Completion
Feb 21, 2025
Results posted
May 8, 2024
Last update
Mar 6, 2025

Study contacts

Natalie Bloom Lyons
study director · Boston Scientific Corporation

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion