An interventional study of Remote photoplethysmography for physiological parameters and standard acquisition system for physiological parameters in Plethysmography, Remote Photoplethysmography Imaging and Physiological Parameters, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-30.
Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Introduced in 1930, photoplethysmography techniques presented the possibility of measuring SpO2 and HR using the absorption of light by the blood to define these signals In recent years, a new approach to photoplethysmography to measure physiological parameters without contact has been developed. This technique, called remote Photoplethysmography Imaging (rPPG), uses the different Red - Green - Blue color spectra at a skin captured by the camera video to determine a plethysmography signal.
Although these systems have been technically valid, they have not been clinically evaluated in a health setting. This clinical trial is to assess parameters measurements by rPPG compared standard acquisition system in real conditions
Central Hospital, Nancy, France is the lead sponsor of 778 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: Remote photoplethysmography for physiological parameters
Device: standard acquisition system for physiological parameters
physiological parameters will be acquired using the Remote photoplethysmography software simultaneously for the conventional parameters measurements (heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation)
physiological parameters will be acquired using the standard acquisition system for the conventional parameters measurements (heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation)
Concordance of rPPG heart rate readings
Heart rateconcordance analysis by standard acquisition system (photoplethysmography of the finger) compared rPPG
Time frame: 30-120 seconds.
Concordance of rPPG respiratory rate readings
respiratory rate concordance analysis by standard acquisition system (photoplethysmography of the finger) compared rPPG
Time frame: 30-120 seconds.
Concordance of rPPG oxygen saturation readings
oxygen saturation concordance analysis by standard acquisition system (photoplethysmography of the finger) compared rPPG
Time frame: 30-120 seconds.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France