CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04655911Updated May 31, 2022

A Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients With MPS IIIB Treated With ABO-101

An observational study in Mucopolysaccharidosis III-B, sponsored by Abeona Therapeutics, Inc. Terminated at 3 sites in 3 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-31.

Sponsored by Abeona Therapeutics, Inc · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Abeona has decided to discontinue development activities for Product AB0-101 due to a lack of drug supply and for business reasons unrelated to the product safety profile and/or signs of efficacy
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, non-interventional, long-term follow-up (LTFU) study in participants who have been treated with ABO-101 in a prior trial. Eligible participants will undergo clinical evaluations at prespecified intervals for 3 years from the last visit in the prior clinical trial (up to 5 years post-treatment).

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, noninterventional, long-term follow-up study of patients with (Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIB) MPS IIIB who have completed a prior clinical trial involving the administration of ABO-101. This study is designed to provide LTFU in accordance with the FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines for patients treated with gene therapy products. The duration of the current study is 3 years for a total of up to 5 years post-treatment for these participants who rollover from a prior clinical trial of ABO-101. Participants will have a maximum of 5 annual scheduled visits with assessments as specified in the schedule of assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mucopolysaccharidosis III-B

Keywords

  • MPS IIIB
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIB
  • Sanfilippo B
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This long-term follow-up study will enroll up to 24patients with MPS IIIB from prior ABO-101 clinical trials. Participants from the previous trials are of any racial, ethnic, or gender background, and could be in the early, middle or advanced phase of the disease

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants that have completed a prior clinical trial involving the administration of ABO-101
  • Parent(s)/legal guardian(s) of participant willing and able to complete the informed consent process and comply with study procedures and visit schedule

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned or current participation in another clinical trial that may confound the safety and efficacy evaluation of ABO-101 during the duration of this study
  • Any other situation that precludes the participant from undergoing procedures required in this study
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ABO-101

    Participants from prior interventional trials involving the administration of ABO-101.

    Biological: ABO-101

Interventions

  • BiologicalABO-101

    Gene therapy rAAV9.CMV.hNAGLU

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Long-term product safety as defined by the incidence, type, and severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: 60 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Age Equivalent Compared to Natural History Study Data

    Change from baseline in the Age Equivalent after treatment compared to Natural History Study data calculated by the Mullen Scales of Early Learning or the Kaufman Assessment Battery far Children; Second Edition, based on chronological and developmental age

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  2. Developmental Quotient Compared to Natural History Study Data calculated by the Mullen Scales of Early Learning or the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children

    Change from baseline in the Developmental Quotient (DQ) after treatment compared to Natural History Study data calculated by the Mullen Scales of Early Learning or the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children; Second Edition, based on chronological and developmental age

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  3. Cognitive Age Equivalent Compared to Natural History Study Data

    Change from baseline in the Cognitive Age Equivalent after treatment compared to Natural History Study, calculated using the Bayley Scales of lnfant and Toddler Development - Third edition or the Kaufman Assessment Battery far Children. Second Edition, based on developmental age

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  4. Developmental Quotient Compared to Natural History Study Data calculated using the Bayley Scales of lnfant and Toddler Development or the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children

    Change from baseline in the Developmental Quotient after treatment compared to Natural History Study, calculated using the Bayley Scales of lnfant and Toddler Development - Third edition or the Kaufman Assessment Battery far Children. Second Edition, based on developmental age

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  5. Adaptive Age Equivalent Compared to Natural History Study Data

    Change from baseline in the Adaptive Age Equivalent score after treatment compared to Natural History Study data, as assessed by parent report using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale II Survey farm

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  6. Pediatric Quality of Life lnventory (PedsQL ™)

    Quality of life based on Pediatric Quality of Life lnventory (PedsQL ™) applicable for participants who completed these evaluations in the prior clinical trial.

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  7. Parenting Stress lndex, 4th Edition (PSl-4)

    Quality of life based on Parenting Stress lndex, 4th Edition (PSl-4).

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  8. Parental Global lmpression Scale

    Evolution on Parental Global lmpression Score, applicable for patients who completed these evaluations in the prior clinical trial.

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  9. Clinical Global lmpression lmprovement Scale

    Evolution of Clinical Global lmpression lmprovement Score applicable for patients who completed these evaluations in the prior clinical trial.

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  10. Parent Symptom Scale Questionnaire

    Evolution on Parent Symptom Score Questionnaire applicable for patients who completed these evaluations in the prior clinical trial.

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

  11. T-cell responses against the AAV9 capsid

    Long-term immunological responses defined as T-cell responses against the AAV9 capsid

    Time frame: 60 Months

  12. T-cell responses against the α-N- acetylglucosaminidase (NAGLU) transgene product

    Long-term immunological responses defined as T-cell responses against the α-N- acetylglucosaminidase transgene product.

    Time frame: 60 Months

  13. Antibody formation (humoral) against the α-N- acetylglucosaminidase (NAGLU) transgene product

    Long-term immunological responses defined as antibody formation (humoral) against the α-N- acetylglucosaminidase (NAGLU)

    Time frame: 60 Months

  14. Antibody formation (humoral) against the AAV9 capsid

    Long-term immunological responses defined as antibody formation (humoral) against the AAV9 capsid.

    Time frame: 60 Months

  15. Viral Load

    Long-term viral load, in applicable cases.

    Time frame: AII study visits (30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months)

Other outcomes

  1. Sanfilippo Behavior Rating Scale

    Change from baseline in the Sanfilippo Behavior Rating Scale (SBRS) scale after treatment compared to Natural History Study data, as assessed by parent report using the Sanfilippo Behavior Rating Scale form. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 6 where higher score indicates a worse outcome

    Time frame: 30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months

  2. Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ)

    Quality of life based on sleep-pattern evaluation based on modified Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ).Minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 111 where higher scores indicates a worse outcome

    Time frame: 30, 36, 42, 48, and 60 Months

  3. Neutralizing antibody against the AAV9 capsid

    Long-term immunological responses defined as neutralizing antibody formation against the AAV9 capsid

    Time frame: 60 Months

06

Study locations

3 sites
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
  • Armand-Trousseau Hospital
    Paris, 75571, France
  • University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share data

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04655911
Lead sponsor
Abeona Therapeutics, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2020
Start date
Oct 28, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 7, 2022
Completion
Apr 7, 2022
Last update
May 31, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion