An interventional study of COSC in Caregiver Interactive Skills, sponsored by University of Copenhagen. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-28.
Sponsored by University of Copenhagen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of an attachment research-informed intervention adapted to the Danish childcare context in terms of improving process quality in center-based childcare for 0-2 years old children. Specifically, the aim is to improve caregiver interactive skills and mind-mindedness. The intervention is delivered in groups during eight weekly sessions and is based on the manualized Circle of Security Parenting model, but adapted to the childcare context: The Circle of Security Classroom model. Intake is planned to be completed in January 2023 and 110 childcare providers are estimated to be enrolled in the trial.
Background:
It is well-established that children's early attachment relationship experiences with their primary caregivers play an important role in psycho-social development. However, it has been shown that also the child's relationship with other important caregivers, such as early professional caregivers in childcare, is important for socioemotional and academic development. In particular, if a child grows up in an at-risk context the quality of early childcare is pivotal for long-term development.
Children with an insecure attachment to their parents are at heightened risk for developing insecure attachments to professional caregivers. However, caregiver interactive skills are found to be associated with children's attachment security to professional caregivers, irrespective of the child's attachment relationship to the primary caregiver. Therefore, professional caregivers' ability to establish optimal interactions with the children in their care provides an important target of intervention in terms of promoting healthy child development.
In a randomized waitlist control trial, this study aims to
Methods:
Childcare centers are recruited from a Danish municipality with a high proportion of at-risk families. Teams of 2-5 caregivers working in Danish childcare centers with children aged 0-2 years are allocated to either COS-C (eight weekly two-hour sessions) or a waitlist. A total of 110 caregivers are estimated to be enrolled, and the intervention will be delivered in groups of 6-10 caregivers. To facilitate implementation, the managers of the participating childcare providers are invited to participate in the intervention.
Effects of COS-C are measured using observations of video-recorded caregiver-child interaction (coded for six key interactive skills: Sensitive responsiveness, Respect for autonomy, structuring and limit setting, Verbal communication, Developmental stimulation, and Fostering positive peer interactions) and Mind-Mindedness (representational and interactional Mind-Mindedness) is measured via coding of transcribed interviews and video-recorded caregiver-child interactions. Structural and caregiver attachment style are measured using observation and questionnaires answered by caregivers and managers. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention are evaluated using questionnaires and via qualitative interviews.
Perspectives:
The project will provide new knowledge on whether a relatively cost-effective intervention can improve the quality of care in Danish childcare centers for young children. Also, findings on how structural factors influence the quality of care will directly inform practice.
University of Copenhagen is the lead sponsor of 465 studies on the registry; 63 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Childcare providers who work in Danish childcare centers ("dagtilbud") for children aged 0 - 60 months in the Municipality of Høje-Taastrup can participate in the study.
Childcare providers with an educational background within childcare as well as childcare providers without education within childcare are included.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Eight weekly manualized sessions of Circle of Security Classroom (COSC), delivered in groups, two hours per session, 5-10 childcare providers per group. COSC is facilitated by a psychologist who is a registered COSP facilitator and who has completed the an additional COSC online training.
Other: COSC
Usual care control condition, i.e., standard practice in the participating childcare centers. Teams of childcare providers are allocated to either COSC or waitlist in clusters, and baseline and follow-up measures are collected parallel in both groups. Childcare providers allocated to the waitlist will receive COSC after the follow-up data have been collected.
COSC is professional development program for early childcare providers adapted from the Circle of Security-Parenting (COSP) model. It is a manualized intervention that leverages research on attachment relationships combining psycho-education with a mentalization-based approach. The model uses pre-produced video vignettes of secure and problematic caregiver-child interactions to illustrate how caregivers' may struggle in meeting children's' attachment needs. Participants are invited to reflect on how they meet and perhaps still not meet the needs of the children in their care with a particular focus on the challenging or 'difficult' children. The COSP manual has been translated into Danish (Cooper, Hoffman and Powel, 2020, translated by Pedersen, Kronendorf von Wowern, Lier, \& Smith-Nielsen), and the additional COSC material has been translated into Danish for the purpose of this study.
Caregiver Interactive Profile (CIP-scales), Sensitive responsiveness scale.
Coding of sensitive responsiveness is based on video-recorded caregiver-child interactions and sensitivity is rated on a 7-point scale with higher ratings reflecting higher levels of sensitivity
Time frame: 12-16 weeks
The Mind-Mindedness Interview
Representational Mind-Mindedness is based on coding of a transcribed brief interview. Each attribute that refers to the child is classified into four categories: 1) Mental attributes, 2) Behavioral attributes, 3) Physical attributes, 4) General attributes, 5) Self-referential comments and 6) Comments regarding institutional practices. The index of representational MM is the total number of mental attributes with higher scores reflecting more Mind-Mindedness.
Time frame: 12-16 weeks
Interactional Mind-Mindedness
Coding of interactional Mind-Mindedness is based on observation of video-recorded caregiver-child interaction. Each recording is transcribed verbatim. The transcript is used to identify all mind-related comments that are coded dichotomously as appropriate versus non-attuned by observing the recorded interaction. The two indexes of interactional Mind-Mindedness are: 1) total number of appropriate comments, mind-related, and 2) non-attuned, mind-related comments, with higher scores of appropriate comments reflecting more optimal mind-mindedness and higher scores of non-attuned comments reflecting less optimal mind-mindedness.
Time frame: 12-16 weeks
Caregiver Interactive Profile (CIP-scales), Respect for autonomy, Structuring and limit setting, Verbal communication, Developmental stimulation, and Fostering positive peer interactions.
Coding of each interactive skill is based on observation of video-recorded caregiver-child interaction and is rated on a 7-point scale with higher ratings reflecting more optimal interaction.
Time frame: 12-16 weeks
The Child Care Worker Job Stress Inventory
The Job resources sub scale is used. 17 questions that are rated on a 5-point likert scale from 1: rarely/never to 5: most of the time.
Time frame: 12-16 weeks
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
3 questions that are rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree
Time frame: 12-16 weeks
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
4 questions that are rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree.
Time frame: Up to 16 weeks
Client Change Interview.
A semi-structured qualitative interview aiming to help clients express (as freely as possible) how they experience a psychotherapeutic intervention has worked. The interview guide has been adjusted to fit the childcare context and the specific intervention for the purpose of this study.
Time frame: Up to 16 weeks
Started Mar 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2023, 22 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.