CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04653935Updated Apr 15, 2021

Pilot Feasibility Study of a Sjögren's Syndrome Self-management App

An interventional study of Self-management app with all intervention components and Self-management app with Information component only in Sjogren's Syndrome, sponsored by Northumbria University. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-15.

Sponsored by Northumbria University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2020, registered Nov 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
996
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates the feasibility of a fully remote effectiveness evaluation of a self-management smartphone application for those with Sjogren's syndrome.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to pilot and assess the feasibility of a fully remote effectiveness evaluation of a smartphone self-management app for those living with Sjogren's syndrome.

The fully-remote evaluation will involve minimal contact with researchers. Potential participants will be recruited internationally online through social media and mailing lists for Sjogren's syndrome support groups. Adverts will direct people to download the self-management app on app stores (Apple App Store and Google Play). The app has been designed to automate all study procedures, by guiding users through the following processes: screening, informed consent, randomisation, and the collection of outcome data through in-app surveys sent at 0, 5, and 10 weeks. Users will be randomised to receive the full intervention or a control:

  • Intervention group: full version of the app containing multiple behavioural components: Symptom and Lifestyle Information, Energy Management, Goal Setting, Managing Difficult Times, Assertiveness and Communication Skills.
  • Control Group: minimal version of the app containing only the Symptom and Lifestyle Information component.

To pilot and assess the feasibility of the planned methodology, and inform the design of a future definitive randomised control trial of the app, the primary objectives of this study are to: characterise users (i.e. international recruitment and consent rates), and test screening, randomisation and data collection procedures (i.e. outcome measure completion rates and score variability). The secondary objectives are to explore app engagement patterns (using log data) and the acceptability of the study procedures and the app (using remote semi-structured interviews).

02

Conditions studied

  • Sjogren's Syndrome

Keywords

  • Self-management
  • Smartphone
  • Autoimmune
  • Rheumatology
03

In context

Sjogren's Syndrome

371 studies on the registry are indexed under Sjogren's Syndrome; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 996 is above the median of 50 across 244 interventional studies indexed under Sjogren's Syndrome.

Browse Sjogren's Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Northumbria University is the lead sponsor of 156 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Diagnosed with either Primary or Secondary Sjogren's syndrome (self-report)
  • Own an iPhone or Android smartphone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
996 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Full app with all app components

    Users receive app that contains all intervention components including: Symptom and Lifestyle information, Energy management, Goal Setting, Managing Difficult Times, Assertiveness and Communication Skills.

    Behavioral: Self-management app with all intervention components

  • Active comparator
    Control minimal app with information component only

    Users receive app that contains only Symptom and Lifestyle information, and cannot see other intervention components.

    Behavioral: Self-management app with Information component only

Interventions

  • BehavioralSelf-management app with all intervention components

    A behavioural self-management app, containing multiple cognitive- and behavioural self-management techniques for those living with Sjögren's syndrome. The intervention is comprised of several components and modules that holistically target several key symptoms: fatigue, sleep disturbances, chronic pain, and dryness. The app has been developed using user-centred methods, and is theory- and evidence-based.

    Also known as: Sjogo app

  • BehavioralSelf-management app with Information component only

    self-management app for those with Sjögren's syndrome, includes Symptom and Lifestyle Information, only.

    Also known as: Sjogo app_information only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of people downloading the app

    Total number of people who download the app from App Stores

    Time frame: Through to completion of data collection period of up to 6 months

  2. Percentage of eligible users (denominator is number downloading)

    Proportion of users who have downloaded the app that are eligible to participate

    Time frame: Through to completion of data collection period up to 6 months

  3. Percentage of consenting users (denominator is number eligible)

    Proportion of those who are eligible to participate that consented to take part in the study

    Time frame: Through to completion of data collection period up to 6 months

  4. Percentage of randomised users (denominator is number eligible)

    Proportion of those who are eligible to participate that complete all surveys at week 0 and then automatically randomised to one of two app versions.

    Time frame: Through to completion of data collection period up to 6 months

  5. Percentage of retained users (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Proportion of those who those who consent to participate that complete all surveys at 5 weeks

    Time frame: Through to completion of data collection period up to 6 months

  6. Percentage of retained users (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Proportion of those who those who consent to participate that complete all surveys at 10 weeks

    Time frame: Through to completion of data collection period up to 6 months

  7. ICECAP-A Completion rate (denominator is number consenting) at 0 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 5 questions of ICECAP-A survey

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  8. ICECAP-A Completion rate (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 5 questions of ICECAP-A survey

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  9. ICECAP-A Completion rate (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 5 questions of ICECAP-A survey

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  10. ICECAP-A Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Average score on "ICECAP-A" Quality of Life Measure across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  11. ICECAP-A Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Average score on "ICECAP-A" Quality of Life Measure across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  12. ICECAP-A Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Average score on "ICECAP-A" Quality of Life measure across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  13. ICECAP-A Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on "ICECAP-A" Quality of Life Measure across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  14. ICECAP-A Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on "ICECAP-A" Quality of Life Measure across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  15. ICECAP-A Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on "ICECAP-A" Quality of Life Measure across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  16. ESSPRI Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 0 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 3 questions of ESSPRI symptom severity survey (assessing dryness, fatigue and pain symptoms).

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  17. ESSPRI Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 3 questions of ESSPRI survey (assessing dryness, fatigue and pain symptoms).

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  18. ESSPRI Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 3 questions of ESSPRI symptom severity survey (assessing dryness, fatigue and pain symptoms).

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  19. ESSPRI Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Average score on "ESSPRI" symptom severity measure across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  20. ESSPRI Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Average score on "ESSPRI" symptom severity measure across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  21. ESSPRI Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Average score on "ESSPRI" symptom severity measure across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  22. ESSPRI Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on ESSPRI symptom severity measure across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  23. ESSPRI Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on ESSPRI symptom severity measure across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  24. ESSPRI Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on ESSPRI symptom severity measure across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  25. MFIS-5 Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 0 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 5 questions of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  26. MFIS-5 Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 5 questions of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  27. MFIS-5 Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 5 questions of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  28. MFIS-5 Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Average score on the MFIS-5 fatigue impact measure, across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  29. MFIS-5 Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Average score on the MFIS-5 fatigue impact measure, across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  30. MFIS-5 Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Average score on the MFIS-5 fatigue impact measure, across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  31. MFIS-5 Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on MFIS-5 fatigue impact measure across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  32. MFIS-5 Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on MFIS-5 fatigue impact measure across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  33. MFIS-5 Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on MFIS-5 fatigue impact measure across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  34. Depression Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 0 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete the single digital VAS regarding severity of depression

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  35. Depression Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete the single digital VAS regarding severity of depression

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  36. Depression Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete the single digital VAS regarding severity of depression

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  37. Depression Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Average score on the 100 point digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  38. Depression Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Average score on the 100 point digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  39. Depression Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Average score on the 100 point digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  40. Depression Digital VAS Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on depression VAS across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  41. Depression Digital VAS Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on depression VAS across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  42. Depression Digital VAS Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on depression VAS across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  43. Anxiety Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 0 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete the single digital VAS regarding severity of anxiety

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  44. Anxiety Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete the single digital VAS regarding severity of anxiety

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  45. Anxiety Digital Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete the single digital VAS regarding severity of anxiety

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  46. Anxiety Digital VAS Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Average score on the 100 point digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  47. Anxiety Digital VAS Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Average score on the 100 point digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  48. Anxiety Digital VAS Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Average score on the 100 point digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  49. Anxiety Digital VAS Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the Anxiety digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  50. Anxiety Digital VAS Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the Anxiety digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  51. Anxiety Digital VAS Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the Anxiety digital VAS across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  52. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 0 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 8 questions of the SCI

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  53. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 8 questions of the SCI

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  54. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 8 questions of the SCI

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  55. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Average score on the SCI across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  56. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Average score on the SCI across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  57. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Average score on the SCI across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  58. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the SCI across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  59. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the SCI across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  60. Sleep Condition Index (SCI) Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the SCI across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  61. PAM-10 Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 0 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 10 questions of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-10)

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  62. PAM-10 Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 5 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 10 questions of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-10)

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  63. PAM-10 Completion Rate (denominator is number consenting) at 10 weeks

    Percentage of those who consent to take part that complete all 10 questions of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-10)

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  64. PAM-10 Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Average score on the PAM-10 across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  65. PAM-10 Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Average score on the PAM-10 across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  66. PAM-10 Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Average score on the PAM-10 across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  67. PAM-10 Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 0 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the PAM-10 across participants

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

  68. PAM-10 Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 5 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the PAM-10 across participants

    Time frame: 5 weeks from date of consent

  69. PAM-10 Standard Deviation of Mean Score at 10 weeks

    Standard deviation around Mean Score on the PAM-10 across participants

    Time frame: 10 weeks from date of consent

  70. User Demographics

    Investigator-developed questionnaire asking users to enter their gender (M/F/Other/Prefer not to say), age (years), whether users have primary or secondary Sjogren's syndrome, number of years since diagnosis, country of residence, and any other conditions users wish to report.

    Time frame: 0 weeks from date of consent

Secondary outcomes

  1. App user retention

    Percentage of participants who launch the app at least once a week as recorded by automatically-generated logs

    Time frame: Interaction data will be collected continuously for up to 13 weeks for each participant.

  2. Frequency of app engagement

    The maximum, minimum and average number of times the app is launched

    Time frame: Interaction data will be collected continuously for up to 13 weeks for each participant.

  3. Duration of app engagement

    The maximum, minimum and average length of time users interact with app

    Time frame: Interaction data will be collected continuously for up to 13 weeks for each participant.

  4. Depth of app engagement

    The maximum, minimum and average number of times users interact with specific app features after launching the app

    Time frame: Interaction data will be collected continuously for up to 13 weeks for each participant.

  5. Acceptability of app and study procedures

    All users will be invited to participate in a remote qualitative interview (up to 60 minutes). We do not expect that all participants will take part, and aim to recruit n=20 (10 in experimental group, 10 in control group). Interested users will be contacted via email to consent and arrange a suitable interview time. Semi-structured interviews will explore acceptability of the app and study procedures (i.e. affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness of the app, ethicality, app coherence, and opportunity costs) and usability of the app (informed by items on the System Usability Scale.

    Time frame: Interviews will take place after users have had the app installed on their device for 10 weeks after date of consent

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Northumbria University
    Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne And Wear NE7 7YR, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data sets (including answers to questionnaires, smartphone interaction data, and qualitative interview data) may be used to support future student projects at Northumbria University, however these datasets will be fully anonymised before being shared.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04653935
Lead sponsor
Northumbria University
Collaborators
Newcastle University, Teesside University, Versus Arthritis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 4, 2020
Start date
Jan 6, 2020
Primary completion
May 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2021

Study contacts

Katie L Hackett, PhD
principal investigator · Northumbria University
Claire H McCallum, PhD
study chair · Northumbria University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion