An interventional study of Holmich Protocol and Myofascial Release Technique in Sports Physical Therapy, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-24.
Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of Homlich Protocol and Myofacial release technique on groin pain in tennis players. A total of 14 players will be included in the clinical trail. There will be one group of 7 players in which Holmich protocol will be applied while in the other group of 7 players will be given Myofascial Release Technique which includes Transverse friction massage and Stretching. Data will be collected by outcome measures before and after the exercise protocol is given. Treatment will be administered three times a week (on even or odd days). The duration of Holmich Protocol each session is about 90 min for module 1 (first two weeks) and 120 min for module 2 (from the third week). From the third week, the athletes will be asked to perform exercises from module 1 every other day, between the treatment sessions. While passive treatment will be given for 30 mins per session. During the treatment course and before the final evaluation, no athletic activity will be permitted . Injuries data will be collected prospectively by respective coaches. Coaches will be trained for identification and classification of injuries.
Groin pain arising from sports injuries is widespread, especially among those who participate in sports that involve repetitive rotational movements such as kicking and turning as in soccer. This type of injury is the fourth most common sports injury, with soccer players suffering from long-term symptoms and frequent relapses. The injury rate is 1.015-1.133 per 1000 hours of play, which is equivalent to 11%-16% of all sports injuries. The prognosis for exercise- related groin pain is not clear. Injured athletes may be forced to wait a long time before returning to sports activity free of restriction.
It is known that adductor-related groin injuries are the most common cause of groin injury, accounting for 69% of groin injuries in football and 58% across all forms of sport. As limited range of hip abduction and hip internal rotation and decreased hip adductor strength (absolute and comparative to the hip abductors) are considered potential risk factors for groin injury. Adductor-related groin pain is often treated without surgery. Among different conservative approaches, it appears that exercise therapy (ET) is more effective than other conservative treatment methods such as electrotherapy, manual therapy or steroid injections. Unfortunately, however, many important factors including frequency, duration and the exact amount of resistance or perceived exertion to be used in the ET protocols have not been carefully recorded in clinical trials. To our best knowledge, the randomised clinical trial carried out by Holmich et al in 1999 still offers the best evidence for the effectiveness of exercise as a prescription for the treatment of adductor-related groin pain. Holmich et al collated the results of ET (based on isometric and isotonic strengthening of the hip abductor/adductor and the abdominal muscles) with results from physiotherapy. They evaluated successful treatment (based on pain measures), patients' subjective global assessments and their return to sport without groin pain at the same level as before the injury. 'Successful treatment' as described in their study is an unfeasible and non-validated measure for evaluating outcome; on the other hand, the published results by Holmich et al was not compared with any such other treatment.
Yousefzadeh A et al conducted a study which checked the effect of Holmich Protocol on groin pain and its results showed to be an effective treatment.
Weir A et al performed multi modal treatment(MMT) in comparison to exercise therapy(ET), results showed MMT to be more effective then ET.
Sernar A et al did a systemic review on treatment of groin players which showed low quality studies present for groin injury management.
Holmich P et al performed a randomized trial on effects of active physical training(AT) on groin pain, results showed AT to be very effective on groin pain.
Kalichman L and Ben David C did a narrative review on the effect of self-myofascial release(SMFR) and concluded that there was a significant increase in joint range of motion and no decrease in muscle force.
Timothy C.Mauntel et al performed myofascial release technique to increase physical performance measurements to check its effectiveness. The systematic review observed a significant change in range of motion but no significant change in muscle function.
Melih Paksoy and Umit Sekmen performed a review of current diagnosis and treatment modilities which showed that response rates to conservative treatment for inguinal pain is very low.
Dines et al performed a study on tennis injuries and showed that groin pain to be present around 3% to 21%.
In the current study, we will reproduce Holmich et al research along with Myofascial release technique to treat long-standing adductor-related groin pain (LSAGP) and analyse the short-term flow of alterations in pain and functional ability. Furthermore, as limited range of hip abduction and hip internal rotation and decreased hip adductor strength (absolute and comparative to the hip abductors) are considered potential risk factors for groin injury, we will also measure these variables as our outcomes. The purpose of this study is to obtain an objective evaluation of the effect of Holmich protocol and Myofascial release technique to compare which is better in treating LSAGP.
Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Treatment will be administered three times a week (on even or odd days). The duration of each session was about 90 min for module 1 (first two weeks) and 120 min for module 2 (from the third week). From the third week, the athletes were asked to perform exercises from module 1 every other day, between the treatment sessions
Procedure: Holmich Protocol
Treatment wiil be given twice a week as individual treatment by the physiotherapist. The duration of treatment is about 30 min.
Procedure: Myofascial Release Technique
Module 1 (1st two weeks): i)Isometric adduction ii)Abdominal sit-ups iii)Isometric adduction iv)Compound abdominal sit-ups and hip flexion v)Balance exercise on wobble board vi)One-foot exercise on sliding board Module 2 (from 3rd week): i)Leg abduction and adduction exercise carried out in side lying ii)Low back extension exercise prone on the end of bench iii)One leg weight pulling abduction/adduction standing iv)Abdominal sit ups v)One leg coordination exercise vi)Training in sideways motion vii)Balance exercise on wobble board
1. Transverse friction massage: 10 mins on painful area of adductor-tendon insertion into pubic bone 2. Stretching of adductor muscles, hamstrings muscles and hip flexors:3 times and each stretch is 30s with Contract relax technique
Hip Range of motion
The hip range of motion including abduction, adduction, external and internal rotation in 90°of flexion will be measured by an adjustable goniometer.
Time frame: 8 Weeks
T-Agility TEST
Set out four cones 5 yards = 4.57 m, 10 yards = 9.14 m. The subject starts at cone A. On the command of the timer, the subject sprints to cone B and touches the base of the cone with their right hand. They then turn left and shuffle sideways to cone C, and also touches its base, this time with their left hand. Then shuffling sideways to the right to cone D and touching the base with the right hand. They then shuffle back to cone B touching with the left hand, and run backwards to cone A. The stopwatch is stopped as they pass cone A
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Edgren Side Test (ESST)
Five cones or lines are placed in a line, three feet apart (12 feet total between the two outside cones). The starting position is at the centre cone, facing forward with feet straddling the center line. At the command 'go', the participant sidesteps to the right until their right foot touches or crosses the outside cone or tape mark. The participant then sidesteps to the left until their left foot touches or crosses the left outside cone or tape mark. The participant sidesteps back and forth to the outside cones as rapidly as possible for 10 seconds.
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Triple Hop Test (THT)
In the triple hop test, the aim is to jump as far as possible on a single leg three consecutive times, without losing balance and landing firmly. The distance is measured from the start line to the heel of the landing leg. The goal is to have a less than 10% difference in hop distance between the injured limb and uninjured limb.
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score (VAS)
The visual analog scale (VAS) scores are based on self-reported measures of symptoms that are recorded with a single handwritten mark placed at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale-"no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm). The values can be used to track pain progression for a patient or to compare pain between patients with similar conditions.
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Riphah International University