ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04627571Updated Apr 1, 2025

Corneal Nerves After Treatment With Cenegermin

An observational study in Neurotrophic Keratitis, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-01.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a condition in which patients have fewer or complete absence of nerves in the cornea, characterized by the reduced or absent corneal sensation. The lack of nerves in the cornea also result in damages of the cornea and in severe situation the loss of the eye.

Cenegermin (trade name Oxervate) is a nerve growth factor eye drops designed to treat NK, and currently, it is the only FDA-approved medication for this purpose.

Even though cenegermin is effective in the majority of patients, there is a lack of understanding of how cenegermin works in the eye.

In this study, investigators aim to determine the structural and functional effects of cenegermin on the cornea, using non-invasive technologies including in vivo confocal microscopy on study participants with NK over the course of a year.

Read the detailed description

Cenegermin (OxervateTM) is a recombinant human form of nerve growth factor developed by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. for patients who are diagnosed with corneal epithelial defects due to moderate to severe stages of NK.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurotrophic Keratitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cenegermin
  • neurotrophic keratopathy
  • corneal nerve
  • corneal sensation
03

In context

Keratitis

108 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratitis; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 105 across 31 observational studies indexed under Keratitis.

Browse Keratitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,170 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 95 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients who are 18 years of age or older, who have a persistent corneal epitheliopathy due to neurotrophic keratopathy that is refractory to conventional non-surgical treatments for 2 weeks or more, and who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria detailed above.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥18 years of age; AND
  2. Persistent corneal epitheliopathy that is to treatments for ≥2 weeks; AND
  3. Evidence of decreased corneal sensitivity, defined as ≤45mm on Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer, within the area of the persistent corneal epitheliopathy; AND
  4. Evidence of decreased corneal sensitivity, defined as above, in ≥1 corneal quadrant outside the persistent corneal epithelial defect.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients with severe neurotrophic keratopathy characterized by corneal stromal ulceration involving over 75% of the total central corneal thickness and impending perforation.
  2. Patients who have used cenegermin eyedrops, autologous serum eyedrops, plasma-rich plasma eyedrops, or umbilical cord eyedrops for the treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy 8 weeks prior to study recruitment.
  3. Corneal surgery (including keratoplasty or refractive surgical procedures) within three months before study enrollment.
  4. Presence of concurrent bacterial or fungal infection.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient Population

    Patients diagnosed with neurotrophic keratopathy.

    Drug: Cenegermin Ophthalmic Solution [Oxervate]

Interventions

  • An 8-week course of topical cenegermin eye drops given 6 times daily would be started in the affected eye, in conjunction with the pre-existing medical treatment for neurotrophic keratopathy. Patients will be followed-up at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (±2 weeks at each time point) after treatment. At each visit, patients will be assessed to determine the corneal epithelial defect and corneal sensation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD)

    To determine the changes in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of changes in CNFD

    To determine the duration of the changes in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Presence/absence of Changes in Dry Eye Symptom

    To determine changes in dry eye symptom scores assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index in patients initiated on cenegermin for recalcitrant neurotrophic keratopathy. A score ranges from 0 to 100 with scores 0 to 12 representing normal, 13 to 22 representing mild dry eye disease, 23 to 32 representing moderate dry eye disease, and greater than 33 representing severe dry eye disease.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Changes in Tear Production

    To determine the changes in tear production in patients initiated on cenegermin for recalcitrant neurotrophic keratopathy.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Changes in Tear Characteristics

    To determine the changes in tear film osmolarity in patients initiated on cenegermin for recalcitrant neurotrophic keratopathy.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sacchetti M, Lambiase A. Diagnosis and management of neurotrophic keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 19;8:571-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S45921. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24672223 ↗
  • Bonini S, Lambiase A, Rama P, Caprioglio G, Aloe L. Topical treatment with nerve growth factor for neurotrophic keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2000 Jul;107(7):1347-51; discussion 1351-2. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00163-9. PubMed 10889110 ↗
  • Lambiase A, Sacchetti M, Bonini S. Nerve growth factor therapy for corneal disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;23(4):296-302. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283543b61. PubMed 22543481 ↗
  • Bonini S, Lambiase A, Rama P, Filatori I, Allegretti M, Chao W, Mantelli F; REPARO Study Group. Phase I Trial of Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor for Neurotrophic Keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2018 Sep;125(9):1468-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 10. No abstract available. PubMed 29653861 ↗
  • Ting DSJ. Re: Bonini et al.: Phase 2 randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled trial of recombinant human nerve growth factor for neurotrophic keratitis (Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1332-1343). Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):e14-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.017. No abstract available. PubMed 30683186 ↗
  • Pflugfelder SC, Massaro-Giordano M, Perez VL, Hamrah P, Deng SX, Espandar L, Foster CS, Affeldt J, Seedor JA, Afshari NA, Chao W, Allegretti M, Mantelli F, Dana R. Topical Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor (Cenegermin) for Neurotrophic Keratopathy: A Multicenter Randomized Vehicle-Controlled Pivotal Trial. Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.020. Epub 2019 Aug 26. PubMed 31585826 ↗
  • Mastropasqua L, Lanzini M, Dua HS, D' Uffizi A, Di Nicola M, Calienno R, Bondi J, Said DG, Nubile M. In Vivo Evaluation of Corneal Nerves and Epithelial Healing After Treatment With Recombinant Nerve Growth Factor for Neurotrophic Keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;217:278-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 May 6. PubMed 32387431 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2022 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 34 months.

Of 16 observational studies under Keratitis, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 34. This study's 34 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 8, 2020
First posted
Nov 13, 2020
StartActual
May 23, 2022
Primary completionActual
Mar 25, 2025
CompletionActual
Mar 25, 2025
Last update
Apr 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04627571
Responsible party
Simon Fung (Principal Investigator, University of California, San Francisco) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2020
Start date
May 23, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 25, 2025
Completion
Mar 25, 2025
Last update
Apr 1, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion