CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04622137Updated Nov 9, 2020

Kinesiotaping Therapy for Clavicular Fractures FRACTURES:

An interventional study of Kinesiotaping therapy in Clavicle Fracture, sponsored by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-09.

Sponsored by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2020, registered Oct 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. Forty patients in whom conservative treatment for clavicle midshaft fractures was indicated between January 2018 and July 2019 were included.

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the kinesiotaping technique for the conservative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures. The investigators hypothesized that kinesiotaping reduces the disadvantages of conservative treatment, such as early-phase pain, high nonunion rates, and a prolonged time to return to work, and yields better clinical and functional outcomes by providing good mechanical support and neutralizing the deforming muscle forces around the fractured clavicle.

Read the detailed description

The investigators divided into 2 groups and followed one group of patients with clavicle fractures only with shoulder sling, while the other group were followed with kinesiotherapy treatment and shoulder arm sling. They investigated the effect of kinesiotherapy treatment on early pain and returning time to work.

02

Conditions studied

  • Clavicle Fracture

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • kinesiotherapy
  • arm sling
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants with midclavicle fracture within 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants with open fractures,

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Arm sling only group (group S)

    Participants used only arm sling for clavicula fracture

  • Active comparator
    Arm sling with kinesiotaping therapy group (group K).

    Participants used arm sling and the investigators applied kinesiotheraphy for clavicula fracture

    Procedure: Kinesiotaping therapy

Interventions

  • ProcedureKinesiotaping therapy

    The investigators used kinesiotaping strips in formations such as the Y, I, X, fan, web, and donut formations ove fractured clavicula.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the two groups in terms of early return to work

    The investigators aim is to examine the effect of kinesiotaping treatment on clavicle fracture union.

    Time frame: 6. months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SBU Prof. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital
    Istanbul, 34040, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Qin M, Zhao S, Guo W, Tang L, Li H, Wang X, Zhu Z, Sun T. Open reduction and plate fixation compared with non-surgical treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(20):e15638. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015638. PubMed 31096481 ↗
  • Sang QH, Gou ZG, Zheng HY, Yuan JT, Zhao JW, He HY, Liu C, Liu Z. The Treatment of Mid-shaft Clavicle Fractures. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Nov 5;128(21):2946-51. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.168068. PubMed 26521795 ↗
  • Craig EV. Fractures of the Clavicle. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Editors. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott- Raven; 1996. p. 1109-1161.
  • Tamaoki MJS, Matsunaga FT, Costa ARFD, Netto NA, Matsumoto MH, Belloti JC. Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Figure-of-Eight Harness Versus Anterior Plate Osteosynthesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jul 19;99(14):1159-1165. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01184. PubMed 28719554 ↗
  • Jones GL, Bishop JY, Lewis B, Pedroza AD; MOON Shoulder Group. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1176-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546514523926. Epub 2014 Feb 26. PubMed 24573571 ↗
  • Wiesel B, Nagda S, Mehta S, Churchill R. Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Nov 15;26(22):e468-e476. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00442. PubMed 30180095 ↗
  • Ersen A, Atalar AC, Birisik F, Saglam Y, Demirhan M. Comparison of simple arm sling and figure of eight clavicular bandage for midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomised controlled study. Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1562-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35588. PubMed 26530661 ↗
  • Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul;79(4):537-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b4.7529. PubMed 9250733 ↗
  • Kaplan S, Alpayci M, Karaman E, Cetin O, Ozkan Y, Ilter S, Sah V, Sahin HG. Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Women with Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Med Sci Monit. 2016 Apr 18;22:1297-301. doi: 10.12659/msm.898353. PubMed 27088271 ↗
  • Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: a meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness. Sports Med. 2012 Feb 1;42(2):153-64. doi: 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000. PubMed 22124445 ↗
  • Akca AH, Sasmaz MI, Kaplan S. Kinesiotaping for isolated rib fractures in emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;38(3):638-640. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.049. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PubMed 31937442 ↗
  • Alexander CM, Stynes S, Thomas A, Lewis J, Harrison PJ. Does tape facilitate or inhibit the lower fibres of trapezius? Man Ther. 2003 Feb;8(1):37-41. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0485. PubMed 12586560 ↗
  • Schemitsch LA, Schemitsch EH, Veillette C, Zdero R, McKee MD. Function plateaus by one year in patients with surgically treated displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3351-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1915-x. PubMed 21590485 ↗
  • Stanley D, Trowbridge EA, Norris SH. The mechanism of clavicular fracture. A clinical and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 May;70(3):461-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B3.3372571. PubMed 3372571 ↗
  • Naveen BM, Joshi GR, Harikrishnan B. Management of mid-shaft clavicular fractures: comparison between non-operative treatment and plate fixation in 60 patients. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2017 Apr;12(1):11-18. doi: 10.1007/s11751-016-0272-4. Epub 2017 Jan 4. PubMed 28054249 ↗
  • Caglar A, Pekyavas NO, Tigli AA, Aytar A, Baltaci G. Are the Kinesio Tape colors effective for patient perception? A randomized single blind trial. J Exerc Ther Rehabil 2016;3:96-101.
  • Woltz S, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. Plate Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):1051-1057. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01068. PubMed 28632595 ↗
  • Burnham JM, Kim DC, Kamineni S. Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Critical Review. Orthopedics. 2016 Sep 1;39(5):e814-21. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160517-06. Epub 2016 May 25. PubMed 27220117 ↗
  • Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;11(5):452-6. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.126613. PubMed 12378163 ↗
  • Thormodsgard TM, Stone K, Ciraulo DL, Camuso MR, Desjardins S. An assessment of patient satisfaction with nonoperative management of clavicular fractures using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure. J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1126-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182396541. PubMed 22071918 ↗
  • Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping® Method. Dallas, TX: Kinesio Taping Association; 2003.
  • Waldmann S, Benninger E, Meier C. Nonoperative Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adults. Open Orthop J. 2018 Jan 17;12:1-6. doi: 10.2174/1874325001812010001. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29430265 ↗
  • Figueiredo GS, Tamaoki MJ, Dragone B, Utino AY, Netto NA, Matsumoto MH, Matsunaga FT. Correlation of the degree of clavicle shortening after non-surgical treatment of midshaft fractures with upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jun 17;16:151. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0585-3. PubMed 26080806 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04622137
Lead sponsor
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Responsible party
Bulent KARSLIOGLU (Orthopedics and Traumatology specialist,Chief assistant, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2020
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2020

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion