ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04600752Updated Jun 10, 2024Results posted

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Augmentin® Extra Strength-600 in Children With Acute Otitis Media in India

A Phase 4 interventional study of Augmentin (ES)-600 in Otitis Media, Infections, Respiratory Tract and Respiratory Tract Infections, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 13 sites in India. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-10.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
310
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
6 Months to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 11 studies in Otitis Media by GlaxoSmithKline — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Otitis Media · GlaxoSmithKline.

Started
2022
the only one that year
Phase 4
Only one
of the 11
Registered
11th of 11
by date

Among the 11 studies in Otitis Media by GlaxoSmithKline, this one is the only one that started in 2022, is the only one in phase 4, and was the 11th registered.

Otitis Media

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Otitis Media; 32 are open to participants now.

Browse Otitis Media studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 11 studies in Otitis Media by GlaxoSmithKline is open now. The open studies under Otitis Media, anywhere →

Who these studies take

Of the 20 Otitis Media studies recruiting now, 5 (25%) set no upper age limit and 15 (75%) stop at 75 or younger; 19 take children under 18; 4 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 6 Months to 12 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 11 studies in Otitis Media by GlaxoSmithKline as a file.
02

Study summary

Augmentin (ES)-600 is a high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 14:1 formulation that allows administration at 90/6.4 milligrams (mg)/kilograms (kg)/day in two divided doses. Most physicians in India use the standard Augmentin (amoxicillin:clavulanic acid 7:1) (45/6.4 mg/kg/day) formulation and double the dose to achieve higher dose of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid at 90 mg/kg/day in pediatric acute otitis media (AOM) due to non-availability of Augmentin (ES)-600. Using the 7:1 formulation causes unnecessary exposure to higher proportionate dose of clavulanic acid (12.8 mg/kg/day) as a unit dose of 6.4 mg/kg/day of clavulanic acid is only required for efficacy against beta-lactamase producing AOM pathogens. Hence, there is an unmet need for availability of Augmentin (ES)-600 in India. This is an open label, single arm, multicenter, non-comparative study in participants aged 6 months to 12 years with AOM. It aims to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of Augmentin (ES)-600 administered in two divided doses, every 12 hours in pediatric population in India. AUGMENTIN is a registered trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.

03

Conditions studied

  • Otitis Media
  • Infections, Respiratory Tract
  • Respiratory Tract Infections

Keywords

  • Acute otitis media
  • Augmentin Extra Strength
  • Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid
  • Pediatric
  • Beta-lactamase
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants aged: 6 months to 12 years; no gender restriction.
  • Diagnosis of AOM on basis of otoscopic findings as defined below:

    1. Purulent otorrhea of less than 24 hours duration or
    2. Middle ear effusion
  • Middle ear effusion is evidenced by at least two of the following:

    1. Decreased or absent tympanic mobility measured by pneumatic otoscopy,
    2. Yellow or white discoloration of the tympanic membrane, or
    3. Opacification of the tympanic membrane plus

At least one of the following indicators of acute inflammation:

  1. Ear pain within 24 hours, including unaccustomed tugging or rubbing of ear,
  2. Marked redness of the tympanic membrane, or
  3. Distinct fullness or bulging of the tympanic membrane.

    • The participant and parent(s)/legal guardian(s) are willing and able to comply with the study protocol.
    • In accordance with regional/local laws and regulations, the parent(s)/legal guardian(s) has given signed informed, dated consent; and the participant has given written assent, if applicable, to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weight more than 40 kg.
  • Spontaneous perforation of the tympanic membrane and drainage for longer than 24 hours.
  • Tympanoplastic tube(s) in place, or has anatomic abnormalities associated with recurrent AOM, prolonged middle ear effusion, including cleft palate or repair, high-arched palate or Down's syndrome.
  • A serious underlying disease as per clinician's judgment.
  • Concomitant infection which would preclude evaluation of the response of his/her acute otitis media to the study intervention.
  • Pre-existing renal insufficiency (plasma creatinine greater than [>]1.5 times for age).
  • Pre-existing liver disease(s) and/or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Evidence of leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia.
  • History of previous reaction to penicillins, cephalosporins or other beta-lactam antibiotics.
  • History of Augmentin-associated cholestatic jaundice/hepatic dysfunction.
  • History of phenylketonuria or a known hypersensitivity to aspartame.
  • Received, within 48 hours of study entry, or is scheduled to receive during the study period, any medication which may alter bowel function.
  • Currently receiving or has received more than one dose of systemic antibiotic therapy within one week prior to the initiation of the study. AOM treatment failures with Amoxicillin, erythromycin, sulfamethoxazole or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole are not subject to this criterion.
  • Receipt of an compound (non-Food and Drug Administration [FDA] and non- Drugs Controller General Of India [DCGI] approved) or device within the previous 30 days or five half-lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of study intervention or during the study.
  • Participants with symptoms suggestive of active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection (fever, cough, etc).
  • Participants with known COVID-19 positive contacts within the past 14 days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
310 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Participants receiving Augmentin (ES)-600

    Eligible participants will receive Augmentin (ES)-600 at 90/6.4 mg/kg/day administered in two divided doses, every 12 hours with food for 10 days.

    Drug: Augmentin (ES)-600

Interventions

  • DrugAugmentin (ES)-600

    Augmentin ES will be administered as reconstituted oral suspension containing Amoxicillin and Potassium Clavulanate 600 mg/42.9 mg per 5 milliliters.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A treatment emergent AE event has its onset date on or after treatment start date and on or before treatment stop date + 1 day

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response at On-therapy (OT) Visit

    Early clinical response was categorized as treatment 'success' or treatment 'failure' at OT Visit (Day 3 to 5). Success was defined as 'clinical cure' that included sufficient resolution or improvement of the signs and symptoms such that no additional antibiotic therapy was indicated or 'improvement' that included improvement in at least 1 presenting signs/symptoms such that no additional antibiotic indicated. Failure is defined as 'Clinical Failure' that included as non-improvement or deterioration in any sign/symptoms after 2 or more days of therapy and additional antibiotic therapy is indicated or 'Unable to Determine' included a valid assessment of clinical outcome could not be made (eg, participant did not attend or consent to clinical examination or lost to follow-up). Participants who were not taking minimum 4 doses in two days were categorized as non evaluable.

    Time frame: On-therapy (OT) visit (Day 3 to 5)

  2. Number of Participants With Primary Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT)

    Primary clinical response at the end-of-therapy visit was categorized as treatment 'success' or treatment 'failure'. Success was defined as 'Clinical Cure' that included sufficient resolution or improvement of the signs and symptoms that no additional antibiotic therapy was indicated or 'Improvement' that included improvement, but incomplete resolution of presenting signs/symptoms and no additional antibiotic indicated. Failure is defined as 'Clinical Failure' that included non-improvement or deterioration in any sign/symptoms after 2 or more days of therapy and additional antibiotic therapy indicated, or 'Unable to determine' defined as a valid assessment of clinical outcome could not be made (e.g., participant did not attend or consent to clinical examination or lost to follow-up). Non-Evaluable is defined as participants who had less than (\<) 80% compliance

    Time frame: End of therapy visit (Day 12 to 14)

  3. Number of Participants With Secondary Clinical Response at Follow-up (FU)

    Secondary clinical response at follow-up was categorized as treatment 'success' or treatment 'failure'. Success was defined as 'Persistent clinical cure' that included sufficient resolution of signs/symptoms for those participants who were clinically cured or improved at the end of therapy and no additional antibiotic indicated. Failure was defined as 'Clinical recurrence' that included reappearance of signs/symptoms for those participants who were clinically cured or improved at the end of therapy and additional antibiotic therapy was indicated, or 'Unable to determine' that included valid assessment of clinical outcome could not be made (e.g., participant did not attend end of therapy visit, or extenuating circumstances or lost to follow-up). Participant with missing responses were categorized as 'Missing'.

    Time frame: Follow up visit (Day 22 to 28)

  4. Number of Participants With Protocol-defined Diarrhea (PDD) (Due to Study Medication)

    Protocol-defined diarrhea was defined as a) 3 or more watery stools in one day or b) 4 or more loose/watery stools in one day or c) 2 watery stools per day for two consecutive days or d) 3 loose/watery stools per day for two consecutive days.

    Time frame: From OT visit (Day 3 to 5) to FU visit (Day 22-28)

07

Results

Posted Apr 25, 2024

Participant flow

This study was an open label, multicenter, non-comparative study. Participants were children aged between 6 months to 12 years, presenting with Acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) including Acute otitis media (AOM), Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) and Community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParticipants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600
Started13610668
Completed13310467
Not completed321
Withdrew: Physician decision001
Withdrew: Adverse event010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject210
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy100

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A treatment emergent AE event has its onset date on or after treatment start date and on or before treatment stop date + 1 day

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsParticipants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)1033
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Early Clinical Response at On-therapy (OT) Visit

Early clinical response was categorized as treatment 'success' or treatment 'failure' at OT Visit (Day 3 to 5). Success was defined as 'clinical cure' that included sufficient resolution or improvement of the signs and symptoms such that no additional antibiotic therapy was indicated or 'improvement' that included improvement in at least 1 presenting signs/symptoms such that no additional antibiotic indicated. Failure is defined as 'Clinical Failure' that included as non-improvement or deterioration in any sign/symptoms after 2 or more days of therapy and additional antibiotic therapy is indicated or 'Unable to Determine' included a valid assessment of clinical outcome could not be made (eg, participant did not attend or consent to clinical examination or lost to follow-up). Participants who were not taking minimum 4 doses in two days were categorized as non evaluable.

Time frame:
On-therapy (OT) visit (Day 3 to 5)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response at On-therapy (OT) Visit
ParticipantsParticipants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600
Success13410468
Failure100
Non Evaluable120
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Primary Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT)

Primary clinical response at the end-of-therapy visit was categorized as treatment 'success' or treatment 'failure'. Success was defined as 'Clinical Cure' that included sufficient resolution or improvement of the signs and symptoms that no additional antibiotic therapy was indicated or 'Improvement' that included improvement, but incomplete resolution of presenting signs/symptoms and no additional antibiotic indicated. Failure is defined as 'Clinical Failure' that included non-improvement or deterioration in any sign/symptoms after 2 or more days of therapy and additional antibiotic therapy indicated, or 'Unable to determine' defined as a valid assessment of clinical outcome could not be made (e.g., participant did not attend or consent to clinical examination or lost to follow-up). Non-Evaluable is defined as participants who had less than (\<) 80% compliance

Time frame:
End of therapy visit (Day 12 to 14)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Primary Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT)
ParticipantsParticipants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600
Success13210467
Failure201
Non Evaluable220
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Secondary Clinical Response at Follow-up (FU)

Secondary clinical response at follow-up was categorized as treatment 'success' or treatment 'failure'. Success was defined as 'Persistent clinical cure' that included sufficient resolution of signs/symptoms for those participants who were clinically cured or improved at the end of therapy and no additional antibiotic indicated. Failure was defined as 'Clinical recurrence' that included reappearance of signs/symptoms for those participants who were clinically cured or improved at the end of therapy and additional antibiotic therapy was indicated, or 'Unable to determine' that included valid assessment of clinical outcome could not be made (e.g., participant did not attend end of therapy visit, or extenuating circumstances or lost to follow-up). Participant with missing responses were categorized as 'Missing'.

Time frame:
Follow up visit (Day 22 to 28)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Secondary Clinical Response at Follow-up (FU)
ParticipantsParticipants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600
Success13010466
Failure001
Missing621
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Protocol-defined Diarrhea (PDD) (Due to Study Medication)

Protocol-defined diarrhea was defined as a) 3 or more watery stools in one day or b) 4 or more loose/watery stools in one day or c) 2 watery stools per day for two consecutive days or d) 3 loose/watery stools per day for two consecutive days.

Time frame:
From OT visit (Day 3 to 5) to FU visit (Day 22-28)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Protocol-defined Diarrhea (PDD) (Due to Study Medication)
ParticipantsParticipants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600
Number of Participants With Protocol-defined Diarrhea (PDD) (Due to Study Medication)010

Adverse events

Collected over All Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse events and Non Serious Adverse events were collected from visit 1 (Day 1) up to follow-up visit (Day 22 to 28). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Participants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-6000/136 (0%)0/136 (0%)10/136 (7.4%)
Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-6000/106 (0%)0/106 (0%)3/106 (2.8%)
Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-6000/68 (0%)0/68 (0%)3/68 (4.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventParticipants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/1361/1060/68
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/1361/1062/68
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/1360/1061/68
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1361/1060/68

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Participants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Total
Mean3.869 ± 2.99954.404 ± 3.01342.592 ± 2.03243.772 ± 2.8913
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Participants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Total
Female603916115
Male766752195
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Participants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Total
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino13610668310
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Participants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis (ABRS) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Participants With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Receiving Augmentin (ES)-600Total
Asian13610668310
08

Study locations

13 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492099, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Jaipur, Rajasthan 302016, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221001, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Belgaun, 590010, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hyderabad, 500018, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kanpur, 208002, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kolkata, 700017, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ludhiana, 141008, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Madurai, 625107, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Nagpur, 440009, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    New Delhi, 110002, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pune, 411043, India
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Purne, 411030, India
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.

Access criteria: Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

Data sharing details ↗ · clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2022 to primary completion in Nov 2022, 6 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2024, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 19, 2020
First posted
Oct 23, 2020
StartActual
May 7, 2022
Primary completionActual
Nov 12, 2022
CompletionActual
Nov 12, 2022
Results first posted
Apr 25, 2024
Last update
Jun 10, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04600752
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Collaborators
Iqvia Pty Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2020
Start date
May 7, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 12, 2022
Completion
Nov 12, 2022
Results posted
Apr 25, 2024
Last update
Jun 10, 2024

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion